About this blog

Untypical Boro is a lively topical blog by the Evening Gazette's award winning football columnist Anthony Vickers that aims to get behind the headlines to flesh out the stories that Boro fans are talking about.

Incisive, provocative and well informed it seeks to engage with articulate supporters and give them a platform to help set the agenda on the issues that matter.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Advertiser

Sponsored links


Boos 4 Us: A New National Binge

Posted by on October 14, 2008 9:55 AM | 

AS A nation we are hitting the boos big style. Booooo. Feral trackie-bottomed bile on Jeremy Kyle; Boooooo. Co-ordinated jeering by the militant saddos gathered outside the Big Brother House with 'look at me' placards; Booooo. Hand-picked idiots eagerly barracking to order on the X-Factor as pantomime villain Simon Cowell tells another tone deaf wannabe to stick to karaoke. It is becoming second nature.

Booing was once a very un-English thing, heard only in the most extreme cases of moral outrage when the traditional strait jacket of reserve was cast aside and collective public disapproval was demanded. Now it seems to be the default setting. It is the soundtrack to our cultural decline. So why commentators are surprised that Ashley Cole got a Wembley roasting is beyond me.

Someone was going to get it - that is what people expect of a public gathering at the New Tyburn. When they built what Ian Wright correctly calls a White Elephant national stadium they should have left the contrived icon of a huge arch on the drawing board and just gone for a massive gallows complete with noose. That would have been more apt, more honest and might have scared the hell out of visiting teams.

It comes to something when, despite a four goal away hammering of the chief group rivals in the last game, the manager has to plead with fans not to boo if mighty England - the Geordies of international football - are not six nowt up after 20 minutes against the Asian minnows' U-21 side.

He should have saved his breath. A scapegoat was demanded. The seething mass, high on tabloid fuelled expectations only on nodding terms with reality, with barely concealed club prejudices ripped out of their normal context and the newly established Pavlovian instinct to boo it was always going to happen. The crowd were not to be denied their inalienable right to pour indisciminate bile on some poor sap. I'm just glad that Stewart Downing wasn't playing. They'd have torn him limb-from-limb in the warm-up.

In the event it was Ashley Cole. Let's be honest, most football fans (including some Chelsea ones if they are honest) wouldn't need much prompting to boo Cole. He is symptomatic of the new breed of crass and greedy players locked in a pampered bubble of bling. He snarls, whinges, moans and portays himself as a victim at every turn. He turned the stomach when he claimed he felt 'physically sick' and 'betrayed' when Arsenal - the club who had nurtured him - only offered him £55k a week and then used that demeaning insult as an excuse to join a club he had already been rumbled meeting in a 'tapping' row. He has also built up an unsavoury tabloid cuttings file. I bet he gets booed in Sainsburys.

But the booing and the aftermath has raised a string of interesting issues, some of which I have touched on in my Gazette column this week. Most obvious to seasoned Boronaics will be the very different way this particular terrace taunting has been treated compared to Dowing.

The booing of Ashley Cole for what was a minor transgression has prompted the Football Association, the manager, his team-mates and the press to rally round to protect the poor sensitive love from such harsh treatment. The FA defied PR logic and entered the minefield of mental health to pronounce their own customers as "crazy" , the boss and stand-in skipper Rio Ferdinand combined to defend him too. That's admirable bigclubtastic solidarity.


How very different to the treatment of Downing, vilified against Andorra by a spittle flecked flock of beer-bellied knuckle-draggers - and then given a more subtle but just as damaging mauling by the press and forced to carry the can for a less than sparkling 3-0 win. No FA statement then, no manager going public to take the flak (although to be honest it probably suited the toothy grinned then incumbant to have a shield from the red-top barrage), no duck-billed shop-steward to step in and certainly no hand-wringing media churning out why-oh-whys about the morality of scapegoating. Oh no, poor Stewy was hung out to dry.

But the England booing - which is different from the club specific version we have covered at length on here in the past - raises other issues too, chiefly about the nature of the atmosphere of endemic hostility at Wembley. It has certainly changed. There is more booing, it is more easily triggered and it is far more easily shaped and manipulated by the poison pen pack who think they should pick the team. If the press launch a collective broadside against a player they don't like it is tantamount to leave him stood above the trapdoor with noose draped ominously on his shoulders waiting for the mistake that will throw the handle and leaving him kicking as part of the spectacle. In recent years it has been Downing, Crouch, Bentley, Robinson, James and even Beckham pushed into the firing line by a cynical press, targets that have been eagerly rounded on by a short-sighted and gullible mob who don't need asking twice to put the boot in.

That is not to say the old Wembley was always nice. Theremay have been a Golden Age, a Pathe News era of Corinthian crowds and polite applause for skills from the opposition, but that is long gone. Far more recent and less easily brushed over is the unsavoury dark years when the scapegoating had a far nastier undercurrent. When it was John Barnes the booing was mixed in with obvious high-volume monkey-noises and vicious racist insults.

So although the booing now is more obvious, closer to the surface and more indiscriminate it is not worse. The character has changed. It is more frequent, more pervasive and more easily triggered (it is certainly not all about the result because England recent record is more than respectable and puts them easily in the top ten in the world) but not as deep or dark.

It has become booing-lite, as much a game-playing release of wider frustrations as anything specific to the target and like the screaming aimed at BB evictees or the freak show exhibits on bearpit TV it is insincere and transient, readily transferred to the next media-created Aunt Sally to come along. It is pantomime booing, dissent by numbers and to a subliminally recognised pattern. So chill, Ashley, it's nothing personal.

Comments (28)

Nigel wrote...

The booing of Ashley Cole was pathetic if predictable and the fact he made a poor pass and gave a goal away was just the excuse the boo boys needed.

He didn't deserve to be booed for the poor pass, but his attitude to his 'poor' treatment by Arsenal means he is a justifiable target.

I think we are in an era now where a lot of fans wrestle with their love of the game and the team they support against the attitude of arrogant, spoilt, over-paid under performing players. Hence the boos are an outlet for a lot of fans frustrations.

My view is that Ashley Cole brought the booing on himself and not because he made a poor pass.

As for the contrast in responses from the FA and 'senior' players for Cole and Downing, well there's no new news here is there. The injustice is not even worth a snort of derision.

We play a 'weakened' Chelsea team at the weekend, we may have a chance of a positive result, which is far more important than anything that happens at Wembley

Posted by: Nigel  | October 14, 2008 3:29 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Cashley Cole was a sitting duck on Saturday. If you took a poll amongst those who booed him I would be astonished if the addressses dont come from North London. It is as hard to feel sympathy for him as it is for Joey Barton.

That doesnt mean you should boo a player in your own team when they make a mistake. There is some (not very much, but some) argument for booing your team after a poor performance. I tend to have a chunter rather than boo, I brood and mutter as I drive back to Derby watching my fuel tank empty thinking what I could have done instead.

The problem with Cole is that we cannot grasp that level of personal wealth, we cannot comprehend how £55,000 a week is not enough - AV might! But he doesnt live in our world, he doesn't comprehend how we are disgusted by his manner and lifestyle. Jamie Carragher, Ryan Giggs and Paul Scholes are all incredibly wealthy men but are almost invisible to the media.

We dont know the details of the salary structure at Arsenal but we can picture the situation where our most important local player gets a bit miffed at having Viduka et al on massive wages. Cashley probably felt the same at Arsenal especially as he was the only Brit in the squad!

The problem is made worse by his behaviour. He left a squad under Wenger who were ill disciplined and allowed to run riot by their manager to join another set of ill disciplined fellow millionaires who dont know any better. Is it any wonder he is a prat?

The press have their favourites, Stevie G is put on a pedestal, the heir to Golden Balls legacy. Woe betide Frank Lampard if he plays in front of Stevie G.

I would think Stewie may as well cash in his air miles and come back to us, he will probably get booed by the stewards on the flight to Belarus.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | October 14, 2008 3:44 PM

Kev Bouttell wrote...

Some good points Mr. Vickers.

Actually, I feel most English footy fans are sick to the back teeth with pampered English stars, who can ride the wave of a credit crunch without even feeling a ripple.

And players such as Ashley Cole are just perfect fora spot of pantomime as you call it. A sickening reaction to his Arsenal offer, when he seems to have already lined up a move to Chelski, and his morals in his private (but very public) life, all adds to the persona of today's modern Premiership footballer as a greedy, underworked yet overpaid professional.

And you are spot on with the analysis of Downing's treatment and the wall of silence from anyone prepared to defend him outside of Boro. We are not paranoid, it's actually true that because he is not from one of the big clubs, no-one is prepared to defend the lad.

Actually, there are a few others in the England team that, should their performances not pick up, will also feel the wrath of an English Wembley crowd that are not concerned with whether they are being played in an unfamiliar position than one they adopt for their club - I'm thinking of Gerard of course. Not only is he hopeless every time he pulls on an England shirt, he's such a miserable sod too!

Keep up the good work Anthony!

Posted by: Kev Bouttell  | October 14, 2008 3:59 PM

Werdermouth wrote...

Boooo! what excuse is that for an opening sentence.

Boooo! that second paragraph is rubbish!

Boooo! How can an overpaid journalist expect us to read that...

OK AV, I'm only joking to make a point - but imagine if you had to put up with a group of people standing over your shoulder everytime you wrote an article waiting for an excuse to jump on your back.

Do you think you would write a better article? Of course not - so why do so called supporters believe that they are doing anything but harming their team's chances by booing.

They are nothing but overgrown spoilt children - I'd rather they stayed at home spitting out their collection of dummies than pretend they are England supporters - football doen't need these morons.

By-the-way, good article!

Posted by: Werdermouth  | October 14, 2008 4:19 PM

2 Otterburn Gardens wrote...

Anthony Vickers..

Paul Bell..

Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

Posted by: 2 Otterburn Gardens  | October 14, 2008 4:43 PM

richardw wrote...

Ive asked the question a number of times but when did we all start booing every team that isnt winning at half time? Do we all really expect to be winning after every 45 mins? And if so then in every game ever played at least one team will be booed off at half time. I remember a time when you supported your team for 90mins and didnt give up after 45. progress eh.

Posted by: richardw  | October 14, 2008 4:59 PM

Pat Mc, Dubai wrote...

I was neither saddened nor surprised by the booing of Ashley Cole. My initial feeling is that he was booed as Ashley Cole the man, rather than Ashley Cole the player. However it goes deeper than that.

It underlines the widening gap of resentment between ordinary fans and the players of today who earn the kind of wage in one week that the average person earns in four years.
Just take that in before we move on. ONE WEEK as opposed to FOUR YEARS.

No one can blame the players for accepting that kind of wage. Let’s face it, every last one of use would take it without thinking if someone stupid enough offered it to us. Earning huge wages is not the fault of the players, it is the obscene PL monster that sadly drives football stars to a territory of unreality where they are untouchable, unapproachable, as the likes of Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt, therefore the players should accept that as part of earning megastar money.

Does that give the average person, the average fan the right to boo if a star player underperforms or makes a major mistake? Definitely, in my opinion. The stars have become detached, in more way than one.

Top footballers today are effectively top movie stars under the umbrella of the BSkyB glamourised wall-to-wall TV football presentation and flashy sponsorship adverts that casts them as contrived, possibly reluctant, superstars across the world.

Look, we are talking ‘entertainment’. If the film stars mentioned above make a bad movie, or deliver a ham performance, they are rightly panned by the critics. Punters will walk out of a cinema disappointed, and if a group of people in the cinema started to boo I dare say that the majority would join in. So why should a superstar footballer escape the same kind of treatment?

I am talking here of the likes of Beckham, Ferdinand, Lampard, Gerrard, Owen, Rooney, Terry….and Cole. It is they who form the elite among English untouchables. The misguided patriotic claims of “we have the best England squad in history…” is sickening given the abject failures in recent years versus the cult status and mega-wages. Is it any surprise that England fans are quick to boo?

Posted by: Pat Mc, Dubai  | October 14, 2008 5:08 PM

Pat Mc, Duba wrote...

And oh yes, one more thing...Cristiano Ronaldo, Booooooo!!

Posted by: Pat Mc, Duba  | October 14, 2008 5:50 PM

Carl wrote...

Booing is understandable and it can have a positive effect...we no longer have Jonathan Greening do we

Posted by: Carl  | October 14, 2008 5:51 PM

geoff wrote...

Booing has gone on for years ask Bernie he got a bit of it. Everytime an ex-player goes back to an old club he expects it, yes its a bit childish but is'nt that the fun of football.

When you are a football fan you get married every August and divorced every May. You can shout roughly what you like at her without much come back. The best thing about her she never nags you into doing the chores, but she can give you a sore throat.

So basically we pay their wages, if they dont like being booed then pack the game in and can you see them doing that? Would anyone out there mind being booed for 90mins for £40k a week or more I think not.

Mind you AV some of the rag reporter's need booing.

Posted by: geoff  | October 14, 2008 8:43 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Carl

A minor point, West Brom 10 points Boro 9.

Must admit I think we will finish above them

Posted by: Ian Gill  | October 14, 2008 8:48 PM

Forever Dormo wrote...

Pat Mc, Dubai - I wholeheartedly agree your comments (in both posts).

If I were paid a signing on fee of a few millions and "earn" a salary of £100K each week, I would promise to grit my teeth and get on with it however loud the booing. My wife, and Jimmy Choo, would be very happy too. I suspect Cashley can afford a nice silk handkerchief to dab away the crocodile tears.

In an entertainment industry, as football likes to be considered, shouldn't the paying (through the nose) public be entitled to express its feelings, provided it doesn't stray into racism or illegality? What do people expect? A sotto voce "Ah well, Ashley old chap, that backpass was a little misdirected, but I suspect you'd probably prefer not to have the error brought to your attention. Never mind. We all make mistakes"?

There are some people in the world with real problems. No-one should lose sleep over the reaction of the crowd to Cole. The phrase "Get over it" springs to mind.

Posted by: Forever Dormo  | October 14, 2008 8:56 PM

Holgate Ender wrote...

One point I agree with is that it is 'crazy' for the FA to make a statement on the booing and 'crazy' for them to slag off the fans who were booing. That will come back to bite them on the bum.

You can't slag off your customers. Because the FA made a pigs ear of it Wembley cost double or treble what it should of and they need every single seat filled at every single game. They can't afford to insult fans. It is a big enough insult with the prices.

Fans will boo if the team are rubbish, losing against Moldovia or Norn Iron or if an specific individual is poor. That is our right. It isn't crazy to boo. Its crazy for the FA to make an issue of it.

Posted by: Holgate Ender  | October 14, 2008 10:23 PM

Ste Mac wrote...

You are right about fans (and the English in general) booing and whooping and hollering like idiots at a drop of a hat these days AV. I despair.

Football used to be a macho world of hard working men letting off a bit of steam but basically cynical about their lot and the hand their team dealt them and just getting on with it.

Now people can't wait to boo, whinge, blub about losing, moan about the opposing fans singing nasty songs, phone up the Three Stooges to complain about the shade of red the shirt is and threaten to sue the bloke behind them because his constant singing has given them tinitus, spoilt their day out and infringed their human rights.

The bigger the club, the bigger the expectations, the more preposterous the behaviour of some of these idiots ready to cry to order on TV and wail that their life is over because something in a game has gone wrong (and yes Newcastle fans, I'm looking at you).

It is one of the things that is turning me off football. Losing a game (or relegation even)is not the end of the world. A player making a mistake is not a capital offence. It's only a game.

Fans are quick to accuse the players of being pampered prima donnas and over sensitive. They should take a good look at themselves. Get a grip!

Posted by: Ste Mac  | October 14, 2008 10:42 PM

John Powls wrote...

I'll have a go at posting again despite the last two or three disappearing into the ether.

On Eng-er-lund (and other International teams) matters - you have to wonder what good the association with the International sides is doing Boro at present.

Leave aside the ever present threat - or reality in Mido's case - of injury we now have Wheats, who has the little matter of a Saturday lunchtime encounter against Chelski, being whisked to Minsk to join up with the senior squad after a tough couple of games with the U21s.

I know that Capello and Pearce wanted to qualify the U21s for the tournament finals and wanted a strong squad but then he goes and plays Wheats out of position at right back - no help to Boro there.

If the full Eng-er-lund squad was being picked on form - this season and last - then Wheats should have been in the full squad from day one. He has to be ahead of Upson and Lescott and couldn't have done worse that the West Ham stoppers Wem-bur-lee performance.

Moving him up after the U21s - presumably just to warm a bench in Belarus - seems to be 'cake and eat it' and leaves Boro with few crumbs of comfort. We get a tired - hopefully not injured - Wheats back on Friday with little or no time to prep for Saturday.

No-one would want to deny the lad the personal opportunity but for me it's Boro first and Eng-er-lund a very poor second.

What you also know is that this Eng-er-lund regime is very unforgiving - unless your name is Gerrard - on those who don't turn up. That means either to squads or in games.

That takes us on to Stewie. He had his chance to shine in Andorra - away from the Wem-bur-lee boo-boys and, frankly, didn't take it. He wasn't even on the bench on Saturday and may not be this evening. I'm one of his biggest fans but even I couldn't justify him being selected on what he's done for England.

He's got to be wondering where the next cap's coming from. That makes me wonder whether that - and the continued struggles with Boro - mean that his thoughts may turn to a bigger team in January.

As a wide left sided, non-European up-tied International quality player he will have his suitors.

Will January bring Gate saying 'this gives Johnno and Porrit their chance' and maybe getting some of the fee to raid, maybe Fulham's and/or Standard's midfield.

I sincerely hope that isn't the outcome and Stewie stays but if it is I also hope that any money that Gate invests in transfers include buying 'ones for now' as well as 'ones for the future'.

Posted by: John Powls  | October 15, 2008 9:03 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

Following on from John's comments I couldnt see the point of keeping Wheats back with the U21's.

If he is so close to the England squad he should have gone with it when Terry dropped out. If he was so important to the U21's he should have played centre back. To play him right back and then fly him overnight to Belarus will only benefit his air miles.

Ironic that Terry is back in the UK getting fit to play on Saturday whilst Wheats is playing out of position, sitting on an airplane to sit on an eastern european bench to sit on an airplane then arrive back with no time to prepare for Saturday.

Cant blame Wheats and I dont think it is a conspiracy. The irony of Cole and Terry staying in England recovering from injury to play Saturday lunchtime whilst Stewie and Wheats are pointlessly jet lagged will not be lost on many fans.

On the Stewie issue, despite being a huge fan, if he doenst get on the bench tonight or in the next match or two it may be time to sell him to realise some spondoolies before he devalues. I didnt get the chance to see the game against Andorra but my son text me on holiday to say he was pants, the croatia match saw a great result. He may not get into the next squad

Sat at Wembley next to John and the big screen didnt even show him getting off the bus! We dont even know he was there, he may have been told to look after the coach and make sure no one knicked it!

Posted by: Ian Gill  | October 15, 2008 10:19 AM

John Powls wrote...

Wasn't Huth down to see the specialist on Monday last?

So, where's the medical bulletin and prognosis?

Has the Gazette asked the question, AV?

As usual, the assumption must be that 'no news is bad news'.

Or, as Ian will rightly remind us, they may not yet have got the correct ankle yet and will then give the 'rest it and it'll be OK, son' advice.

We'll then wait weeks with Huth sidelined and not improving before it's decided that - contrary to previous pronouncements - it is a recurrence of the old injuries and an op. is needed and he's then out for months.

**AV writes: Huth latest diagnosis/prognosis is in tomorrow's Gazette.

Posted by: John Powls  | October 15, 2008 2:53 PM

John Powls wrote...

Oh dear. Now I know it's bad news!

Posted by: John Powls  | October 15, 2008 4:02 PM

paul bell wrote...

message to 2 otterburn gardens.

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!to you to.

Posted by: paul bell  | October 15, 2008 4:13 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

John

With regard to Huths elbow injury they havent finished their cup of tea so they cant read the leaves. Either that or they cant catch the chikcen to scatter its entrails.

Dont forget that you are allowed to take paracetanol for 6 days so until he has done that, rested it and run it off they wont be able to tell what is wrong with his hamstring.

I know they did try and send him off to the chap who sorted Steve Backleys shoulder but you must realise cruciate ligament injuries take some time to diagnose.

See what you have done now! I have been grumpy all week and you have made it worse. They are probably looking at the Readers Digest Home Medical Guide to see what to tell the Gazette.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | October 15, 2008 4:39 PM

Night Shift Nigel wrote...

"Boos 4 Us" is the best blog title you've had yet - you've got to be a proper Teessider to get it.

Never did work out whether the shop name was meant to be read "for us" or "for youse"...

Posted by: Night Shift Nigel  | October 15, 2008 7:37 PM

Forever Dormo wrote...

I've had a hard day at work today (not actually in the office but at the coalface, if you like). I've done my letters. I've had my main course and a couple of glasses of something from our cousins in New Zealand (no names, no pack drill!) and I can hear the oven whirring in the background and I know there is something choclatey and decidedly naughty to come.

Time then, to look at the posts here. Ian Gill at 4.39pm ... the best laugh of the day by a mile. I am still smiling now! But bear in mind, many a truth is spoken in jest. Like JP at 4.02pm I fear the worst but would be delighted if it doesn't come to pass, especially in light of Wheater's globe trotting exploits.

Belarus. The pub does show Setanta so I might catch the second half but, as has been said before, Boro first and England well down in the order of priorities.

Posted by: Forever Dormo  | October 15, 2008 8:08 PM

John Powls wrote...

Arca - back in full training on Monday and 'see how it stands up'.

Huth - still a month off but doesn't need an op.

Mido - may be available for Saturday.

Forgive an old sceptic but I have a quizzical eyebrow raised.

Posted by: John Powls  | October 16, 2008 12:48 PM

Nigel wrote...

Ian Gill - Presumably the announcement from Boro on the injury situation means the chicken was finally caught, perhaps it was easy to catch because it had an ankle injury and could only run round in circles.........

Posted by: Nigel  | October 16, 2008 2:33 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

John

How can you have a quizical eyebrow raised with your head in your hands, tears running down your face and splitting your sides with laughter?

Posted by: Ian Gill  | October 16, 2008 2:46 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Nigel

It was probably a headless chicken and they told it to run it off.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | October 16, 2008 3:58 PM

bugrit wrote...

Ian Gill,

It's just a knack that John has.

Posted by: bugrit  | October 16, 2008 5:26 PM

Midland Smog wrote...

I just wanted to say how much I enjoy reading your blog AV.

As an ex Ayresome and Riverside season ticket holder, now a long term exile in Coventry, it is fantastic to read a genuinely intelligent column about the team I love, that doesn't play to the lowest common denominator. Without wishing to overinflate your ego, you write with real passion and combine sharp insight with lively imagery.

I agree wholeheartedly with your take on the boo-ing phenomenon, and I hope that Stewie reads your comments (as I'm sure the whole team does!!) and takes some solace from those sentiments. I know I am proud to see him make the England team and back him 100%, as any genuine fan would.

As for Ashley I think he is a prat, but also a gifted player. Even top flight players make mistakes, but it takes a special kind of idiot to boo your own players just when they need your support the most. If we carried this mentality into our everyday lives the world would be a miserable place. I don't subscribe to the 'well he gets paid this much so he deserves it' ethos.

**AV writes: Thank you for your comments and welcome aboard.
"I've never met you before this evening have I sir?"
"No Dad."

Posted by: Midland Smog  | October 17, 2008 9:47 AM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertiser