About this blog

Untypical Boro is a lively topical blog by the Evening Gazette's award winning football columnist Anthony Vickers that aims to get behind the headlines to flesh out the stories that Boro fans are talking about.

Incisive, provocative and well informed it seeks to engage with articulate supporters and give them a platform to help set the agenda on the issues that matter.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Advertiser

Sponsored links


Seismic Sense Of Injustice

Posted by on February 27, 2008 9:13 AM | 

TEESSIDE was rocked by a seismic tremor ranked 5.2 on the Richter scale last night. But despite early reports it is now clear that the bed-rattling disturbance was no earthquake... the furious subterranean activity was in fact Boro digging themselves in deeper

Some determined nocturnal spademanship by the club's big hitters has transformed what should have been a routine dust settling period after the rejection of the "frivolous" appeal against Jeremie Aliadiere's red card at Anfield and the additional punishment into a full on movement of football's political tectonic plates. Outraged Steve Gibson and Keith Lamb both switched to full-on bloody-minded Teessider mode and gave the FA's assorted 'amateurs' and 'silly little men' both barrels in a blast that will reverberate through the day.

Now we must brace ourselves for the aftershocks.

Whatever your thoughts on the club's decision to appeal - the rules only allow a specific incident to be reviewed not the events leading up to it; the referee had already said he had seen the whole incident so is deemed to have already dealt with Mascherano; Aliadiere had clearly struck or attempted to strike an opponent and was bang to rights; there was no question of mistaken identity; provocation is no defence; the manager accepted the card without much complaint after the game - there can be no doubting that most Boro fans, indeed most football fans, will instinctively agree with Steve Gibson's heart-felt attack on the jumped up petty apparatchniks that run the game in a blazered bubble of bureaucratic glee.

There is a clear feeling widespread within the game and among the fans that the entire FA disciplinary system is arbitrary, out-dated and fundamentally unfair. For a swat at a minor irritant - or 'violent conduct' as the charge sheet has it - Aliadiere has now ended up serving a longer ban than Matty Taylor who practically severed Eduardo's ankle.

Worst, the fact that almost every action on a pitch is now visible to millions of viewers, presumably including the FA big wigs who later sit in judgment on disciplinary panels, there is a public perception that far, far greater crimes are routinely going unpunished through a combination of visually impaired referees and spineless suits who have refused to tackle the issue head on. They are bringing the game into disrepute.

You can see why Boro are angry. Everyone saw what happened. If the ref didn't then they must ask themselves why. And if he didn't see the entire incident it must undermine his contention that Aliadiere was the culprit and his competence to weigh up exactly what happened. And if the ref did see it - and the suggestion is that he did otherwise the panel could take retrospective action - then surely the key question is why he took no action against the Liverpool man. It is the glaring inconsistencies and inequitable treatment of players in this manner that lead to accusations of big club bias, of incompetence and of a complete institutional failure. And it is the frustrations of being on the wrong end of a pseudo-legal lottery that has left Boro fuming.

Gibbo in full-flow is a joy to behold, not just on this issue but on questions of players workloads and wages, devious agents and the inherent big club bias in football politics strikes chords with frustrated fans well beyond the TS postcodes in which he is revered. Whatever reservations you may have about the positions he takes - and it easy to see both the appeal and the subsequent tabloid balsts as unwise - his righteous anger, searing honsety and obvious contempt for legal and diplomatic niceties screams a principled Park End populism that is refreshing and sometimes shocking in football's world of self-serving double-speak, institutional hypocrisy and arcane and opaque structures.

Here's what he spat out when asked about the rejection Aliadiere's appeal and the imposition of an extra match ban in punishment for the impertinence of daring to question the existing, rigid one-size-fits-all schedule of sanctions.


"It's a ridiculous decision to call it frivolous and I'm absolutely furious. Most observers of our game thought it was very harsh when Jeremie was sent off and I certainly can't see how one player was more guilty than the other. To be sent off for violent conduct suggests the prospect of someone being seriously hurt and that clearly wasn't the case. On that basis we appealed.


"We thought a more experienced referee would have only given both players a talking to. To punish the club further simply because the disciplinary panel says our appeal was frivolous is absolutely subjective.

"We have amateurs in charge of the professional game. When you look at some of the bad tackles that have been punished far less it's completely ludicrous. This is a professional game and we need professional people making professional decisions not these silly little men'"

Keith Lamb has also weighed in to the debate and had launched a series of attacks across every available media outlet, bringing in other examples of similar appeals and concentrating his fire on the concept that the appeal was "frivolous", a decision that is a direct criticism of himself and the club officials who chose to use the FA's quasi-judicial structure in the expectation of getting a result. Lamb said:


"Who are they to know our minds when we made this appeal? We are appalled at the decision and the entire process. How can nameless, faceless people on a commission decide that our genuine claim for equality and justice be dealt with in such a flippant manner?

"It is a disgraceful comment to suggest our claim was frivolous. We agonized over it before deciding to submit a claim for 'wrongful dismissal'. It seems strange that only recently Chelsea's appeal against Michael Essien's three-match ban was rejected but not considered 'frivolous'. It appears that there is one rule for the big boys and another for the rest of us.

"The whole thing is grossly unfair. If anything in this whole farcical affair was frivolous it was the original incident. Finally, the sporting ethos is that everything should be fair and equitable. How on earth can Jeremie Aliadiere think he has been treated fairly in this whole charade when the outcome is clearly a travesty of justice?"

Boro must now face a political backlash. Not immediately maybe, and almost certainly not publicly, but there will be a pay-back for this. If there is one thing the suits at Soho Square can not tolerate it is bringing the whole inequitable and anachronistic basis of their structures and the autocratic and opaque nature of their decisions into the spotlight.

The fall-out from the whole "three points" is not forgotten at our end - Gibbo picks at that scab often enough to suspect that the wound still gives pain and fans are quick to brandish the scar like a streetfighter displying his scars as a badge of honour - and it is fair to assume that it is not forgotten at that end either: the puffed-up provincial power-brokers were not happy that their authority was challenged and less still that Boro were ready to put their objections on a legal basis and expose the entire structure to outside scrutinty. They are all still there in senior positions so to rattle the cages again could yet have reverberations.

But Gibson is a shrewd operator and has the political nouse to turn that perception of bias and friction to Boro's short-term advantage. In reacting passionately and with an indignation that short-circuits any calculating assessment of the realities of the rule book the chairman is emotionally in tune with the vast majority Riverside faithful. Supporters will identify and empathise with his response and with just a little bit of fine-tuning that passion can be used to galvanise the crowd with a sense of injustice and a belief that in the oft-outlined battle between
David and Goliath we are the goodies. We have God on our side.

Just as the 'three points' engendered a seige mentality and forged a strong unity that pushed Boro to Wembley, so can this. A brooding sense of injustice can fire the Boro crowd up for the rest of the season, leave it seething and looking to vent frustration. It could make for an electric atmosphere tonight. Bring it on....


Comments (22)

Ian Gill wrote...

Must admit I thought an appeal wouldnt succeed but there was a very slim chance it may. There have been a few cases where the sending off was deemed as punishment enough or reduced to a yellow.

Sadly the FA tribunal decided to increase the penalty unlike in the Essien case which was a far worse offence and certainly was a trivial appeal.

What beggars belief is that the ref says he saw what Mascherano did and deemed it acceptable. The crowd howled when Aliadiere reacted and it looked as if the ref responded to that.

Sending him off and not even booking Mascherano was a homer decision. Aliadiere was silly and probably with hindsight so was the appeal.

The problem is that it sticks in the craw. What can we do? Stuff all. Watching Skysports news this morning it barely rated a mention and as they are the paymasters of football that is the end of the matter.

Until football moves to the rugby approach to discipline we will have to live with the inconsistencies and week willed, cowardly application of justice. There are still problems in rugby but at least they try to sort it out.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | February 27, 2008 10:57 AM

stockton red wrote...

Final point on the Ali situation-Essien was sent off against Derby lately for flinging his elbow into the face of Miller.His appeal was rejected but was not extended. Why why why? And where is the consistency.

Why dont the F.A. look at their own rules and amend them for the benefit of the game? If a ref has seen an incident and not punished the perpetrator why cant they punish a player retrospectively if he deserves it?

Diouf was guilty of a shocking over the top leg breaking tackle at Anfield earlier in the season but went unpunished. Why?

Chelsea's John Obi Mikel was given a straight red in the last game before the African Nations Cup so he in effect went unpunished as his ban was served whilst he was away. Is this right? Is this fair?

Posted by: stockton red  | February 27, 2008 10:59 AM

werdermouth wrote...

It's possible that Aliadiere may have gained unlikely support from Mascherano.

When asked after the match what his reaction to Aliadiere's sending off was, it was reported that he was completely gobsmacked...

Posted by: werdermouth  | February 27, 2008 11:00 AM

'ignorant' of boroland wrote...

So once again the FA try to urinate on our parade!

Make an example of Aladin in the light of the Edwardo tackle then ante up when it comes to the amount of games he misses.

The FA is the common enemy to English football and this farcical ruling will resonate with many , and not just Boro fans. There is much more I want to say but it would have to be edited.......

Mido and Alves your time is now , go for it!

Posted by: 'ignorant' of boroland  | February 27, 2008 11:04 AM

robin mitton wrote...

AV,

You are right but let me say something else if I may. Our FA are the laughing stock of Europe too and I should know.

Was it £850m quid for Wembley and we haven't got an English coach capable of running the national team?! Can't work out whose fault that is can we?

I am livid with the Ally decision too just like everyone else. And if they muck us about again then Gibbo really should take them to court and expose them for the crass, prejudice "silly little men" they well and truly are. These useless men should get their trotters out of our game.

About time we as a nation got rid of these thick as a parrot parasites. It's a very sick joke and I agree with Gibbo's and Lambies response. How do these idiots get their jobs?

I AM IN TOTAL GRUNTING CONDEMNATION OF THE WHOLE SWINEHERD LOT OF THEM...


Robin Mitton
FOOTBALL FOR NATIONS & PEOPLE

Posted by: robin mitton  | February 27, 2008 11:25 AM

Mark J wrote...

It seems that when the FA look at the Boro they cant help these two inner thoughts 'Four legs good, two legs bad' and 'Some animals are more equal than others'

Posted by: Mark J  | February 27, 2008 11:29 AM

martin in southampton wrote...

One of the most glorious moments of being a Teessider was the FA Cup final of 97's rousing bellow of '3 points 3 points' echoing around Wembley.

Perhaps when we get there this year and the FA senilities are lead out to meet the players all looking like Young Mr. Grace, we can all shout '4 games, 4 games'. Just a thought!

Posted by: martin in southampton  | February 27, 2008 11:40 AM

ayupyabugga wrote...

Yup, it reeks of the 3 points scam they played on us.

All at work agree that it was probably pointless to appeal originally but to have the ban extended shows the true extent of the divide between the big clubs and the rest.

Quite poignant in the light of Gibbos rant on the David and Goliath scenario. Could you imagine Alex Ferguson standing for an extra game ban on one of his players?
I doubt it.

Lets hope this slap in the face (again) lights the touch paper and sets the fireworks off tonight.

COME ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: ayupyabugga  | February 27, 2008 11:43 AM

SpikeArmstrong wrote...

This whole Aliadiere sending off is 'frivolous'.

Any stronger ref would of realised it was a 'frivolous' incident and not produced a 'frivolous' red card !

The incident was so 'frivolous' the Boro had every right to appeal, in the hope the FA see sense and overturn the red card or even drop the suspension to a one match ban ?

The FA have handled this appeal with so much 'frivolous' contempt that they have turned the matter into a complete farce themselves by 'frivolously' adding an extra games suspension to such a 'frivolous' incident on a weekend when the spotlight highlighted serious incidents on the football pitch which carry real serious consequences.

The punishment does not fit the 'frivolous' crime.

Posted by: SpikeArmstrong  | February 27, 2008 12:57 PM

Finchy wrote...

Well it's extremely disappointing but hardly surprising.

Mascherano clearly should have been punished too. I think if that had happened the club may have let the matter lie. But then the ref would have looked silly in front of all those home supporters for making so much of such a laughable incident. It should never have made it into the ref's report let alone been the major incident that was reported.

So the appeal was turned down but the extra ban for Aliadiere is an insult. Can't argue with the card or the subsequent ban, but to increase it seems rather petty minded. It seems clear the FA hold some grudges.

I hope Jeremie can have the last laugh and 'violently' slap the FA suits with an injury time winner in the Final of their cup. I would love to see their crocodile smiles as they hand the cup over to a provincial unfashionable club.

Just how does somebody get to work for the FA I wonder? Probably with the right school tie...... Anyone any idea how long they would last in the real world?

Oh well, let's use the episode to spur us on to better things.

P.S. I would be interested in Geordie Lurker's views, he probably finds the whole thing funny but be honest, it could easily have happened to Joey Barton.

Posted by: Finchy  | February 27, 2008 1:07 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Finchy

Dont encourage Geordie Lurker.

As for Joey Barton, I cant recall him getting into trouble for a light slap in the past, not really his style.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | February 27, 2008 1:49 PM

John Stone wrote...

Well if the referee claims," he had a clear view of the incident", it is he who should be disciplined for not applying the rules! If JA.was sent off so should have Mascherano.

PS. Please can we have a penalty against Man.Utd this year.

PPS.Not a chance !

Posted by: John Stone  | February 27, 2008 2:01 PM

Finchy wrote...

Fair enough Ian, we all know the lurker isn't exactly constructive but a non-boro-biased view might be refreshing don't you think?

As for Barton, I regret comparing him to Jeremie, it wasn't fair on our lad.

I think Gibbo and Lamb are so frustrated because there really is very little they can do. We were, a few seasons ago, only a small town in Europe. We always were just a small town in the eyes of the FA. Can't see that changing any time soon.

Posted by: Finchy  | February 27, 2008 2:25 PM

Brad wrote...

It will be interesting to see if Lineker and co. have any comments to make on the extra punishment in tonights entertainment. MOTD on Saturday night thought the sending off was harsh.

Posted by: Brad  | February 27, 2008 3:34 PM

Nigel wrote...

Aliadiere was daft to react thus forcing the ref. to make a decision. The club were daft to appeal, it was never going to succeed. The FA we all know are a bunch of incompetent spineless fools.

Bring on the blades.

Posted by: Nigel  | February 27, 2008 3:51 PM

Tom Pringle wrote...

I don't think we'll be the only set of fans at the match tonight to agree with Gibbo's sentiment.

I seem to recall that a certain other side have recently fallen far greater victim to the FA's double standards when it comes to applying the rules....

Posted by: Tom Pringle  | February 27, 2008 4:04 PM

Tony wrote...

FA spokesman on the BBC website:

"If the appeal is considered to have been frivolous, then a further suspension can be added to the original ruling. This has happened to Burnley, Mansfield, Luton, Tranmere and Hartlepool this season"

What are the chances of ever seeing Man Utd, Arsenal, Chelsea or Liverpool on that list? (About as much chance of an earthquake striking Teesside I'd say-.

...wo...o...o.h!!!..w...w....wwhat's...t..t..that...s..s...s....sh...aking?!?)

Posted by: Tony  | February 27, 2008 5:19 PM

Neil (Baku) wrote...

We are not alone in this. Here are some comments from Man Utd fans (Teamtalk) to the FA on the inconsistencies of the referee’s decision making in various games, including ours on Saturday. It's a bit long winded so Vic may cut it down, but it's worth a read.

...

Darren Brackley, Manchester United fan.

I am writing to express my dismay, and downright disgust, at YET ANOTHER nonsensical decision from your disciplinary panel. You aren't interested in the spirit of fair play, only in upholding your own, antiquated, disciplinary rules at any costs.

Robbie Keane - goes in with ONE foot raised and gets 3 match ban; Lee Bowyer does the same, and has a red card rescinded; Adebayor head butts a team mate and has no action taken, as video evidence is deemed ' inconclusive'; Barton lashes out, versus Aston Villa, and gets the same result, no action, as video evidence deemed 'inconclusive', nonsense!; Gallas kicks out at Nani, and Wiley doesn't deem it violent conduct; Petrov does the same on Monday night and gets a straight red card!

Mascherano GRABS Aliadiere's face and the referee takes no action, Aliadiere reacts with no more than a brush to Mascherano's face and gets sent off! Boro appeal, on the quite justifiable grounds that Mascherano got nothing, whilst their player gets 3 matches? What does the FA do? Increase the ban to 4 games for a frivolous appeal! Why?
Because you are not prepared to be challenged on anything!

I'm sorry, but the FA as an organisation has long been regarded by the average match going fan as an unaccountable joke. The continued nonsensical decisions, and refusal to address blatant inconsistencies in refereeing, in my view, leave you unfit to run our national game. Frankly, you ARE a joke, an absolute joke.


BRACK66, Manchester United fan.

Having just spoken with the Head of Customer Relations at the FA, she states she compiles a report for the governing board of the FA every month on fans views with regard to refereeing incidents. Therefore, I suggest all fans make their views known to the FA by e-mail.

I have asked her to find out if the referee in the Liverpool- Boro game has been asked to look at the video evidence again with regard to Javier > Maschrerano's part in this incident. One of her colleagues earlier told me Lee Mason HAS looked at the video, and STILL deemed Mascherano's actions NOT to be violent conduct! I have asked her to confirm whether this is the case.

Again, we, as fans, have to take a stand on this. If it means contacting the FA every Monday morning, after the weekend games, then we should do it.

They are saying they can't act if the referee deems incidents not worthy of red cards, as they are bound by a FIFA directive. They say they are in discussions> with FIFA to change this. If they are, then we need to pressure them into doing so. Bombarding them with e-mails and telephone calls may just see some action taken!


BRACK66, Manchester United fan.

Can I suggest people go onto the fa.com, and scroll down to the 'Disciplinary latest' icon. Click on it, and you will see a list of offences that have been appealed in the past few months. The Essien red card was against Derby over the weekend of 24 November 2007. He appealed, the appeal was rejected, and yet his appeal was deemed NOT to be frivolous! 2 clubs appeal a sending off of one of their players, for exactly the same offence. Both appeals are rejected. Yet one is frivolous and the other isn't! Why?

I can only draw the conclusion that it was because one involved a 'Big 4' club, and the other didn't. I have just again spoken with the head of CR at the FA, and pointed this inconsistency out! She couldn't say why different decisions were arrived at, but said she would 'look into it' for me, and ring me back! I therefore gave her my mobile number! Cheers!

p.s. There were 4 other appeals of violent conduct/serious foul play red cards that weekend. ALL were dismissed, yet NOT ONE player got an additional ban! A complete and utter joke!

**AV writes: Interesting input, especially as it is is from fans of a club most other supporters would regard as one of the teams that gets preferential treatment.

Posted by: Neil (Baku)  | February 27, 2008 5:20 PM

London-based Boro fan wrote...

"Brad wrote...

It will be interesting to see if Lineker and co. have any comments to make on the extra punishment in tonights entertainment. MOTD on Saturday night thought the sending off was harsh."

There was quite a lengthy discussion & total agreement that 1) the sending-off should've been no more than a yellow card for both Ali AND Mascherano &, given the way things actually worked out, 2) that there was no justification whatsoever for the one-match extension!

Interestingly, given the comments by Man U fans quoted by Neil (Baku), those posted on 606 on the Beeb site also seem to be overwhelmingly hostile to the FA's senseless & totally incomprehensible response to the Boro appeal! :)

The half-time discussion also included an interview with Gibbo on the subject. It's the first time I've seen him speak & I have to say, I was most impressed with his reasonable & measured comments - no suggestion of any ranting & raving by an intemperate nutter!

* Well done this evening, lads, but please try to pull your socks up & don't blow it against Cardiff, especially with JFH waiting in the wings...

Posted by: London-based Boro fan  | February 27, 2008 11:46 PM

jiffy wrote...

All seems to have gone quiet on this issue now.

The FA will be quietly heaving a sigh of relief and thinking yet again lying low and saying nowt and they will just go away.

So come on Gibbo - we've seen you on the box and you have instigated a certain amount of national debate on the subject where are you going next?

Or was it all just posing for the cameras?

Come on you have started the ball rolling. Is that it? Are you just going to let it all fade away? That's how we end up with the inept administators we have now. You can't just give up now - FIFA havent threatened to take away the World Cup if we dont shutup and stop whingeing yet!

**AV writes: After such a powerful blast with such searing accusations live to a national audience on Match of the Day I think we can safely say there will a frenzy of political activity behind the scenes at the FA right now.

Posted by: jiffy  | February 29, 2008 1:05 PM

jiffy wrote...

I doubt that AV

They will just crawl back under the stone and let it all fade away now unless Gibbo keeps it in the public eye.

Exactly like they did with the 3 points issue until we took them to court over it.

Posted by: jiffy  | February 29, 2008 2:02 PM

Finchy wrote...

Anyone seen the latest? Lampard's red card recinded. Surprise Surpise. Seems that playing for Chelsea and England helps with your discipline. Even when you haven't got any.

Posted by: Finchy  | March 4, 2008 3:47 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertiser