About this blog

Untypical Boro is a lively topical blog by the Evening Gazette's award winning football columnist Anthony Vickers that aims to get behind the headlines to flesh out the stories that Boro fans are talking about.

Incisive, provocative and well informed it seeks to engage with articulate supporters and give them a platform to help set the agenda on the issues that matter.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Advertiser

Sponsored links


Bem Vindo Afonso!

Posted by on February 7, 2008 10:45 AM | 

HALF-and-half Boro/Brazil bobble hat.... check. Portuguese phrase book... check. Laptop.... check. Carnival sized bag of latin football cliches.... check. Let the Samba beat begin.

The club had called an impromtu Riverside carnival to unveil the £12.7m new Boy From Brazil and Boro fans obliged. The faithful had a rummage around the loft to find their old Brazil scarves and join the hastily recruited samba band and flambuoyant carnival queens to welcome Afonso Alves. With bunches of balloons in clumped in red and blue and yellow and green molecules of hope and ambition and half-and-half paper flags flapped by an army of excited schoolkids there was a colourful and noisy backdrop to the arrival of our latest latin superstar and a crowd of maybe 2,000 in the West Stand lower.

And if "the Fonz" is as dedicated and persistent on the pitch as he is in pressing the flesh then we really can stand by for Happy Days. Afonso seemed to have made it his personal mission to shake hands with every single person gathered in the West Stand. Posing for every camera phone, puckering up for the lasses, thumbs up for the lads, he worked his way along the throng shaking and signing for everyone that asked. Long after the camera crews had moved upstairs for the main press conference, long after the samba band departed on the bus back to school, long after the bulk of the crowd had drifted away he was still down there pitchside scribbling away in books and programmes and on shirts with impressive industry.

So much so that he held up the main press conference and Gareth Southgate was cajoled by impatient hacks to start without him, doing the usual routine Fulham pre-match fitness and signficance lines for the local media first. After a few minutes the star attraction ghosted in unmarked at the back and siddled up to his interpreter quietly trying to avoid attention like a schoolboy sneaking in late for assembly. He stood arms crossed watching intently wearing casual jeans and an away shirt, a shrewd move ticking all the marketing boxes as he had spent the last hour wearing full home kit for his meet and greet and keepy-up session on the pitch.

One of the first questions he was asked by the cliche hungry scribes was if the two colourful carnival dancers and the chaotically but enthusiatic primary school percussion backbeat had made him feel right at home and via his interpreter he agreed that yes, it did. So he is very polite and incredibly diplomatic as well as blessed with incredible patience.

It is hard to believe he really thought that two women dressed in garishly coloured and overly elaborate costumes straight out of a pantomime and thirty kids eagerly bashing out a rhythm on maracas, triangles, tambourines and various other bits from the back of the music room cupboard bore any relation to Mardi Gras on Copacobana but it is the thought that counts.

And what the cacophonous welcome lacked in authenticity it made up for with sincerity and warmth. The kids were excellent, they never waned in their music making for the best part of an hour as the excitement built before Alves appeared from the tunnel and they redoubled their efforts to keep the samba beat going through the entire hour he mingled with the crowds.

These things are always bizarre. On the pitch there were a battery of TV cameras and a posse of snappers from all the nationals, the Gazette and the news agencies. Then there were the carnival queens moothing about and on the running track the band and Roary.

In the stands were the expectant crowd: in the south big gangs of uniformed kids bussed in from nearby schools - they are all currently working with Boro's training centre and education programmes so need for tut-tutting or grumpy types ringing up the truant bobbies - and to the north a thousand or so regular fans spread right across the Riverside's regular age and class profile. And right across the emotional spectrum too, from over-excitable ra-ra types who possibly spend most of their spare time and money in the club shop and who see the attending the event as an article of faith to the maybe more cynical and curious on-lookers, the fat and forty self-employed who could easily swing an afternoon off, smaller groups of older teenagers from the estates and a lot of parent and toddler combinations, often in matching replica shirts.

There were plenty of replica shirts on show, including some older ones, and possibly a few antiques that had survived from the similar unveiling of Juninho almost 13 years ago. A lot of the crowd had clearly passed by the club shop on the way in because among the vintage Juninhobilia there were shiny new scarves and flags and scattered through there was a sprinkling of box fresh home shirts revelling in first-on-the-block credibility and embazoned with the number 12 and lengthy pound a letter full name of Afonso Alves.

It was a strange atmosphere. Some supporters were clearly buzzing at the prospect of seeing the new boy in the flesh first but there was also a more cynical element that maybe we have seen this all before, that it could never be like Juninho and that maybe it was all a bit contrived. There were plenty stood back and looking on in silence and refusing steadfastly to be sucked into the ersatz emotion... although it was noticeable that many of them relented and drifted down to get their own autographs later on.

He finally emerged from the tunnel decked out in a home kit and natty blue boots and after a brief introduction from microphone man Gordon Cox to shrill pre-teen cheering and after a brief stint of vaguely embarrassed waving from the pitch ahe walked over to the crowd and was almost immediately buried in a scrum of well-wishing handshaking. Half-an-hour later he was dragged out of the crowd and whizzed through some stunted pictures with the dancers, and flags, and Gareth and Roary then he did the obligatory ball-juggling - clumbsier than you might expect for the thick end of £13m but we'll be generous and say he lacks match practice - before a second extended session of flesh-pressing.

In all he was shaking hands for well over an hour as people came back two and three times clutching merchandising to be signed (possibly for later flogging on Ebay) so much so that after a while he seemed to be getting on nodding terms with some of them. The Boro press people asked him several times if he wanted to call it a day on the shaking in front rather than risk repetitive strain injury but no, he said he was fine and kept on going.

As the crowd drifted away he remained, shaking and posing until the last few yellow hatted kids left and then went upstairs for the press conference, guided by his slick interpretor he said all the right things: "I want to repay the warm welcome with goals."

The latin set piece worked on almost every level. The wide-eyed kids got up close to the guy who they will soon be emulating in the playground, the older element of the audience got to claim bragging rights in the pub, the TV cameras got wall to wall footage of the whole spectacular and the tabloids got some nice pictures and an open goal of a story... surely that shoudl secure Boro the page pages tomorrow. The press office could rub their hands happily at the samba spin success and the knowledge that the whole operation ran smoothly from the off.

**

NO TO GAME 39.......

The Football Supporters Federation is gathering ideas and numbers before preparing a co-ordinated response to the latest Blatteresque lunacy of taking the game on an ill-concieved and fundamentally unfair money-making roadshow.

You can check out the latest developments here:


I might write something later (although I have been tapping away solidly for what seems a week now and I'm running the risk of RSI). As a taster of what you will read in the tabloids tomorrow here is the Press Association's round up of quotes on the issue:

“We will only go where we are welcome. We will also only do this if it is sanctioned” - Premier League chief Richard Scudamore.

“We look forward to discussing the detail with the League and looking carefully at the implications, to ensure that the proposal fits well alongside the existing fixture list, including our domestic cup and league competitions and our national team games” - the Football Association.

“What disappoints me is David Gill phoned me and said ’keep this quiet, we are going to discuss it’ and then it’s all over the papers this morning. They can’t keep their mouth shut down there” - Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson.

“I have to say, I think it is great. Change is good sometimes. Obviously, it depends who you are playing in that extra game - if we were playing one of the top four, I might argue then” Sunderland boss Roy Keane.

“It’s good, it’s innovative. We are the prime league in the world at the moment and I heard on the TV this morning that English Premier League football is seen in 200 countries across the world. So we have to do something to keep it in everybody’s eye-line and I can only presume that the world-wide TV contract is up for renewal” Reading manager Steve Coppell.

“This displays a complete disregard not for the proud traditions of the English game as well as a crass lack of consideration for football supporters in general” - Football Supporters’ Federation chairman Malcolm Clarke.

“I intend to meet with the Premier League to discuss these concerns, and I will urge them to listen closely to the views of the FA, players and supporters” - Andy Burnham, secretary of state for culture, media and sport.

“It would be like the Harlem Globetrotters!” - Portsmouth boss Harry Redknapp.

“I think it will be great for the Premier League. It’s one game and gives the opportunity, particularly to smaller clubs, to take your brand and take it global and I find that very exciting” - Birmingham co-owner David Gold.

“Can you imagine going to Fergie (Sir Alex Ferguson) and telling him ‘by the way, you’re not playing at home this week, you are playing in Japan’? I’d like to see it!” - Birmingham manager Steve Bruce.

“We would not be comfortable if we felt one club would be getting more than others. It has to be right for our football club” - Sunderland chairman Niall Quinn.

“Is it April 1? I find it highly unlikely it would happen. I wouldn’t think it would be a realistic proposition” - Middlesbrough manager Gareth Southgate.

“It is obviously a marketing thing. I would have to have a clearer picture of what is behind this marketing idea - I would have to find out more about it” - Fulham boss Roy Hodgson.

“We mustn’t disguise the fact that all clubs have overseas fans, the Premier League is broadcast to 200 countries on a weekly basis and therefore it’s not just the domestic fans we need to think about” - Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy.

“From a player’s point of view, it’s daunting. It will certainly take its toll physically if we are flying halfway around the world and back before starting domestically again” - Derby midfielder Robbie Savage.

“I can understand what the traditionalists may say, but the Premier League is worldwide” - Everton defender Phil Neville.

“I think it’s great. I don’t think it will be a huge problem and the benefits far outweigh the cons” - Bolton manager Gary Megson.

“I think this move is inevitable as clubs look to tap into new markets which have not yet reached their potential” - Dr Simon Chadwick, director of the Birkbeck Sport Business Centre and football business analyst.

Comments (33)

jc wrote...

John Powls:

What Aliadiere actually said was that if we beat Fulham "...there is a bit of a gap developing between us and the third from bottom team. If we get three points we are almost safe."

It was the Sky journo who (over)stated 'Jeremie Aliadiere feels victory over Fulham at the weekend will secure Middlesbrough their Premier League place.'

OK, so you might still say that 29 points is not "almost safe" either, but with such wide competition for the relegation places and a very low safety threshold this season, it would be very highly unlikely that we would be relegated from that position. So I think Ali is about right.

Break out the caipirinhas!!

Posted by: jc  | February 7, 2008 1:11 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Talking of merchandising it is interesting to note that there are proposals for a 39th league match of the season overseas (like the NFL at Wembley).

I wonder which clubs might benefit the most. Who will get to play in the high value markets and who gets to play in the coral clump half way between Chile and New Zealand.

We are advised that top clubs will be seeded so that they dont play each other. Is that to ensure fair shares or so their brands are not diluted?

To be fair cities will have to bid for the games and are likely to get two games. Imagine bidding £20m and getting Wigan-Boro, Derby-Bolton!

Posted by: Ian Gill  | February 7, 2008 1:47 PM

Richard wrote...

Just watched Alves being introduced to the kids at the Riverside balloonfest on Look North live at lunchtime.

He looks to be about the same height as Southgate and somewhere between Southgate's and Mido's girth!

TLF with muscle? Hope so!

Posted by: Richard  | February 7, 2008 1:48 PM

Scott Jackson wrote...

Obviously you'll have the miserable sods from this town complaining (as they always do) and it was slightly cringeworthy but if it gets more parents and kids through the door on Saturday (and beyond) then it was a good call from Boro having the unveiling.

I'm looking forward to seeing him, although I'm not sure he'll be starting on Saturday, he should definitely be on at some point in the second half.

Posted by: Scott Jackson  | February 7, 2008 2:55 PM

Brad wrote...

The photo suggests that he might be competing with Mido for belly fatness.

Posted by: Brad  | February 7, 2008 6:03 PM

Richard wrote...

This post has nothing directly to do with "The Fonz" arrival. I've just seen the following and I feel a major rant coming on!:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_prem/7232390.stm

This is about the FA's proposal to increase premiership matches to 39 per season ans play 10 matches overseas. I’ve just had my sense of personal and social violation heightened.

If any fan ever felt that the game of the people was still the game of the people, maybe this will finally convince you that increasingly, it's got nothing to do with you, the people!

What attracts the huge amounts of money from overseas that has come into the Premiership in the last few seasons? Only the prospect of making even more money. That’s what. And punters, the ordinary men and women in the street have been left behind in all of this.

The "English" FA is selling out rapidly and big time. Against a background of almost suicidal despondency at England's failure to qualify for Euro 2008, and the overwhelming desire for the English National squad to qualify for the 2010 World Cup, isn’t it a bit hypocritical to be moving the game towards diminishing national identity boundaries?

England - a future flag of convenience! That's what the national identity will be reduced to!

Commercial interest is all that matters to the people who are running the game in the UK. Even if it means selling out national identity. Even if it means turning their backs on the games’ grass-roots.

Why do this?

The only possible rationale for taking games overseas is money. Money for the TV people. Money for the club owners. Money for the players. Does it make the game any better for us, the punters? They will argue that it does. It improves the “quality of the product”. Well surely that depends on how you view “the product”.

Ask Derby County supporters, or Birmingham City supporters, or Newcastle United supporters if they consider that “their product” has been enhanced as a consequence of more money in the game. Is it better value for money than it used to be?

Not if the cries of punters across the country are to be believed, about the price of matchday tickets, football merchandise and TV subscriptions! Not if the continuing debates and complaints of supporters of clubs outside the biggest are to be taken notice of. Not if the post-match phone-ins to local radio stations around the country are to be considered in any way representative of the views of the UK football consumer.

If “the enhanced product” typified by the disgracefully sterile FA Cup Final between Manchester United and Chelsea – the supposedly best “brands” in the country - is any kind of measure, then you can keep your “new improved product” and stick it where the sun doesn’t penetrate!

The fact is that “the product” is NOT improved by the huge injection of money.

In a sports league, “the product”, surely has to be COMPETITION! And that’s what the FA refuse to acknowledge or have failed to appreciate. Their (yes, THEIR) league is no longer a competition - other than to see who has the deepest pockets! The Premier League is an annual procession, led every year, by four or five clubs.

More money into the Premiership has NOT improved that product at all. If anything, it has diminished genuine competition. Which is what, I believe, most grass roots punters in this country want to see. That is “the product” that has been bought by punters in this country at 3pm on a Saturday afternoon. (Or at least it WAS, until Sky had games moved for transmission convenience to other “slots”).

It can be demonstrated very, very easily, by studying the statistics facts of the Premiership, season by season, that contrary to creating greater competition, the new money has resulted, season-upon-season, in a greater polarization from top to bottom of the league. The rich are get richer and stronger and the rest are finding it harder to compete and hang on!

There is an insidious, structured and deliberately manipulative movement now becoming increasingly obvious - a lot less veiled than it used to be. It has accelerated dramatically this season, as though the cat’s been let out of the bag and those who are colluding to make the changes happen, had now better crack on and do so before too many cries of “foul play” get up a head of steam and in case some retardation force throws a spanner in the works.

Or maybe they consider that all the pieces of the jigsaw are now in place and popular opinion cannot now be mobilized against it. That is to say, the “Tipping Point” has been reached and it no longer matters that punters in this country can truly see and object that their national game has now been hijacked and is being used for huge financial gain by people who are already colossally rich by anyone’s standards but their own. Maybe they consider that it’s going to happen irrespective of popular opinion on the country!

But what kind of worthwhile national "culture" is based on deserting your home support, even partially, in the interests of attracting even more money than most of the owners know what to do with anyway, and the accumulation of even greater wealth?

And it’s not as though improvement in the national capability can be used to justify such a move. Hell’s teeth! England didn’t qualify for Euro 2008, despite all of the money in the game in this country! So don’t be fooled into believing the trite pseudo-altruistic spin being trotted out by the FA that our national game is better for it!

Utter nonsense! We all know where the money is going – and it’s not being recycled back into the game! And neither are the punters in this country any better off for it! We’re paying through the nose for it! And to add insult to injury, we’re apparently not capable as a nation of providing them with enough of our money already, so they’re going to get it from overseas, not only via Sky, but actually taking our teams offshore!! Oh come on!!!

Of course it's absolutely pointless asking such people to give the game of football back to the people! "Give" is an alien concept to them. Because it doesn't align with the accumulation ethos.

Don’t get me wrong! I’m not averse to making money and I understand the merits of a capitalist system, but in my book there are limits. And for me, one of them has just been reached. It’s like selling our national heritage. It’s a bit like watching as Stonehenge or The Forth Bridge, or The Tower of London are dismantled moved to Moscow, New York and Bangkok!

I find it offensive, because I see considerable value in tradition, and national/social loyalty as well as threat from myopically worshipping at the altars of Dollar, Pound, Yen, and Baht!

The widespread local/regional competitive essence of our national game has been compromised. It has been well and truly prostituted by the FA and is now about to be globally pimped!

Major rant over. But I don’t feel any better!

**AV writes: I agree with most of that. I see the US influence (and the 'success' of the NFL playing a game at Wembley to expand the market) ever larger.

They will say the first year it is an experiment and pay the turkeys who voted for Christmas a lot of money. Then next year they will say it was a success but they want seeding extended so the top teams all play a bottom team.

Then they will say that the global TV market doesn't want Derby, Birmingham and Boro and - precedent set - it will just be the teams in the top eight. And it is so popular that they want two extra games. And hey why the hell not make it a standard play-off format with a Super Bowl final?

European Conference East anyone?

Posted by: Richard  | February 7, 2008 10:04 PM

Clive Hurren wrote...

Woh, careful AV .... with that over-the-top (but enjoyable) description you run the risk of inciting Geordie Lurker!

If you out-Barcode the Barcodes, he'll be back on here soon enough complaining that we think we're a big club. Not that I think we could ever match the hype surrounding the return of KK, but it's good to have our own bit of razzamataz, and good to hear Boro got a publicity stunt right.

Perhaps the times really are a-changin'?

Posted by: Clive Hurren  | February 7, 2008 10:05 PM

London-based Boro fan wrote...

This is not strictly to do with the Fonz's arrival, but someone (don't know who, because I can't find the relevant post now!) asked the other day about a new goal-keeping signing.

Have just found the following snippet on the Beeb site under Bradford... We certainly need more experienced cover, even a straight replacement, for Schwarzer, who now makes me very nervous, but an 18-year-old when we already have young Ross Turnbull? Would prefer Jaskelainen...

"Middlesbrough sign keeper Filler

Middlesbrough have signed teenage goalkeeper Sam Filler from Bradford City. Boro have paid an undisclosed fee for the 18-year-old youth-team keeper. Filler had spent periods on trial at both Middlesbrough and Newcastle before Boro had an offer accepted by the League Two side. Filler is another successful product of Bradford's youth system which also saw midfielder, Andre Wisdom, 14, join Liverpool earlier this season."

Posted by: London-based Boro fan  | February 7, 2008 10:09 PM

jc wrote...

I was waiting for Richard's inevitable post after hearing about this extra offshore game proposal, and he didn't disappoint.

He has said what I would have, had I been more fluent and more passionate about the game! Although, I suspect the limit he mentions was reached some time ago. There are a couple of extra points I'd like to add though.

First, I'd like to emphasise something Richard has previously pointed out, that fandom and consumerism are not at all compatible.

Treating football as purely a business erodes the competition and tribalism that are the entire point of supporting a team.

If you can't relate to a team because most of the players come from thousands of miles away and have no loyalty to anything but their payslip, the owner(s) come from thousands of miles away and...etc, and half of the 'fans' of your team are distant glory hunters who've never been to the ground; and if you can have a fair stab at correctly predicting the final positions of every club in your league, not because you're good at that sort of thing, just because it's so f*(|<ing predictable - then you might start to wonder if it's worth bothering.

The problem is that supporters find themselves in an impossible situation - if they don't collude with the businessmen by giving more and more of their money to the club, their team will suffer! It's catch 22 - to continue being a fan, you've got to feed the beast that's slowly destroying the very reasons for being a fan.

Second, I think the government (actually, all the governments of footballing nations) have to sit up and take notice of what's happening.

At the moment, football and its various bodies have a privileged legal position. Although some changes have occurred towards more of a free market in football (e.g. the Bosman ruling), football still enjoys a large degree of protectionism.

There is no competition between footballing associations (i.e. there aren't 3 different FAs); no 3 o'clock Saturday games can be televised (well, broadcast in this country, anyway); most importantly, access to games is monopolised: that is if you want to watch a game on TV, you don't get a choice of providers.

The Premiership sell TV rights to the highest bidder and you either pay them to watch the match or you don't watch it (obviously, actually going to a game is inherently monopolised as it can't seemingly be any other way).

This kind of exclusivity goes against European competition law, but is allowed because football is a "special case". Why? Simply because governments recognise the role that football plays in the national psyche and the particular relationships of supporters towards their clubs.

Football supporting is not a free market: people don't generally change allegiance just because they don't like what they see one Saturday afternoon (god help Boro if that ever becomes the case!). So the way football is run and sold should not be a free market either.

The problem is that the new foreign football investors don't see it that way, and the authorities seem blind to the damage, so far and in the future, that this is causing. Monopolies need regulation, and the regulation isn't happening. The businessmen are getting all the benefits of football's special position with none (or few) of the checks and balances which should be in place.

Incidentally, this is the reason that players make so much money. The best way to make a lot of money in a free market is to create a product (in this case, the entertainment provided by you as a footballer) which is both popular and can be created once but sold many times over (shown to many spectators).

Which is why the biggest jump in player wages came with global televisation. But a true free market has competition which naturally keeps costs down - football spectating does not. Is Ashley Cole's contribution to society equivalent to, say, 500 nurses? Nope.

Posted by: jc  | February 8, 2008 1:21 AM

Richard wrote...

AV:

If any of your readers/ contributors feel as strongly about the FA's overseas match proposals as I do (either positively or negatively), perhaps they'd be interested to register their views at the Football Supporters Association's website, where they can also vote on whether they are in favour of the proposal or not.

Reading through the BBC website's 606 Chat Room comments on the proposal, it appears that the vast majority of fans right across the country are very much opposed to the idea and many are taking the opportunity to voice their dissatisfaction with the disenfrichisement of the game from the grass roots of popular support which has enable the game to grow and flourish in this country.

The response has been huge and largely, angry and disparaging of the FA.

The link is -

http://www.fsf.org.uk/site-pages/poll.html

Perhaps readers might also choose to send the link to friends who may have views on it also?

A good demonstration of democratic principles wouldn't do the FA any harm, I think, and maybe a sharp reminder of where the main marketplace for "the product" actually is might help re-focus their attention on how to make "the product" REALLY more attractive.

Posted by: Richard  | February 8, 2008 2:51 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

Two things have caught me eye.

I have already posted about the plans to play another fixtur abroad. I was listening comments about how it could pan out. Imagine it is this weekend, due to the seeding system the top five cannot play each other and here are some of the matches

Boro v Derby
Sunderland v Chelsea
ManU v Wigan
Fulham v Reading
Arsenal v Birmingham
Toon v Villa.

The points gained will count as normal, in this scenario it is going to be grossly unfair to Sunderland, Wigan and Brum playing three games in a season against a top five club. Barking mad.

The other point of interest is that Yak has not returned to Everton following Nigeria departing the cup and they dont know where he is. Didnt Lambie tell Moyes that no one knows where Yak goes every February?

Posted by: Ian Gill  | February 8, 2008 7:33 AM

Never Happy wrote...

Hopefullt Afonso is just 'big boned' and can play tomorrow.

Just read that Yakubu has gone missing after the cup of nations

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/2008/02/08/everton-striker-yakubu-goes-missing-after-africa-cup-of-nations-exit-89520-20312674/

Usually goes missing on the pitch after Christmas, now he topped that by going missing off the pitch as well.

C'Mon Boro!

Posted by: Never Happy  | February 8, 2008 9:18 AM

David Morrison wrote...

London based Boro Fan:

It was me asking about this keeper. I noticed we signed him and just wondered what his reputation was like. Is he a new scott carson etc?| A quality keeper at such a young age?

I might aswell put my thaughts into this premier league debacle aswell.

I think AV is right, the fact thats the clubs have voted for it unanimously proves that football in this country will surely be split and divided sooner or later.

We as fans are not loved or as important as we where. tv money outways every fan in the land and just subsideses huge wages.

It wouldnt surprise me at all if the major clubs boycotted the Premier League eventually to form a European super league which then splits into this world wide scenario.
Great for Man Utd but for Boro? No thanks...

COME ON BORO!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: David Morrison  | February 8, 2008 9:30 AM

John Powls wrote...

jc

On the Aliadiere comments - you're rather making my point about Aliadiere putting himself in a position to be 'misquoted'.

This contradicts AV's view of yesterday that he is media savvy and meant what he said - leave aside what the exaggerated version of it was that ended up being quoted.

The best and most experienced know the dangers of a whiff of foam hand and that the most effective brand of confidence is the quiet sort. Up until this week, by and large we've managed that pretty well.

It's not the confidence that is wrong, far from it, it's the un-necessary running off at the mouth about it.

The time to allow ourselves some satisfaction - and from the manager and players this should still be of the quiet 'job done' variety - is after we've won the Fulham game, not before.

For quite a lot of fans - and some journos - the most startling effect of foam hand intoxication is the loss of short term, let alone long term memory.

Just take a skim back a few short weeks through this blog's archive. It won't take you long to reach the point where we were all sure that if this Boro side had a Native American name it would be 'Takes-Foot-Off-Gas' or 'Only-Plays-One-Half'!

And the predictions, which to me still hold true, were that this season could and would go right down to the wire - just like last season - before we know whether we've survived or not in this league.

The key to that is winning the six pointers, and like tomorrow's game, keeping the run we're on going and traction maintained until we eventually burn three teams off to the point where they can no longer reach us.

It was good to see a positive vibe from yesterday's event with Alves. It was well handled all round and a deserved success.

I see that similar festivities are planned for Saturday. This must surely mean that Alves has to play some part in the game, otherwise that will all fall a bit flat.

I know there is a difference between a full fitness assessment and a medical but, presumably, we haven't bought him with an injury a la Huth - what would be the point since we need an injection of goals now.

So, if he's not injured, and even if he's not fit to play a full game yet without risk, then he must surely be fit enough to come on as a sub when the game has opened up a bit and others are tiring.

In the midst of all the uber-marketing at Boro that is going on around Alves it may seem churlish to attack the Premier League for doing the same thing. But why not?

As soon as the grid-iron league game came to Wembley it was only a matter of time before we saw the Prem's proposals for their version.

What you couldn't bargain for was that it should be quite such a nakedly opportunistic, money driven, cack-handed proposal.

To confirm this, you only have to read the division in the reaction between the sport and the business.

Those against - every manager I have seen quoted and all the fans in this country. Those for - Chairmen, Chief Execs and satellite broadcasters.

Before MFC gets too pious there is the same split here. The Prem League vote was unanimous for - so that includes Gibbo/The Count whereas Gate's reaction was 'Is it April Fools?'

For some posters above, and though it sticks in my craw, we have to be fair to the FA. Not their idea and they have opposed it publicly today as have UEFA and FIFA.

The proposal the Prem have put forward is so nuts that you wonder whether they aren't doing the same trick as politicians often do - trailing such an awful proposal that by the time they get round to what they are actually going to do - and, mark my words, something of the sort will happen - everyone accepts it as being less bad than what could have happened.

Posted by: John Powls  | February 8, 2008 11:17 AM

Never Happy wrote...

Another proposal passed by the PL yesterday was to allow teams to have 7 subs.

I agree with Ian on the seeded teams idea.

Imagine if the PL title and relegation was on the line and a bottom team is drawn against the league leaders, yet another was playing against a mid table side with nothing to play for.

Would it be the top five against the bottom five?

Its madness but it will happen, as it all boils down to money.

On to tomorrow, lets start the game in the same fashion as we did against Wigan but put the chances away.

C'Mon Boro!

Posted by: Never Happy  | February 8, 2008 11:53 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

A further thought about the prem league version of home or away.

If we had a winter break the clubs would jet off to warmer climes (AKA somewhere with a marketing oportunity) and play meaningless friendlies against other teams that just happen tp be there.

This is merely an extension of that where the prem league can exploit the brand instead of individual clubs.

I come back to my main argument in that it will be fundamentally unfair to many clubs. In the scenario I painted earlier you could see Fulham and Reading drawing and staying up by a point from the 39th match after Sunderland and Brum going down by losing theirs against top five clubs.

It just isnt right or fair.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | February 8, 2008 12:11 PM

London-based Boro fan wrote...

Never Happy: he's back - from the Beeb site:

"Yakubu in talks after late return

by Phil McNulty, Chief football writer

Yakubu has arrived back on Merseyside for talks with Everton boss David Moyes after the striker's failure to return on time from the Africa Cup on Nations. The 25-year-old was expected at Everton's training headquarters on Wednesday after the quarter-final defeat by hosts, Ghana.

But he failed to arrive and may face a club fine of a fortnight's wages, estimated to be around £80,000. Nigeria team-mate Joseph Yobo returned to Everton on Wednesday, as scheduled.

Yakubu is unlikely to be considered for Saturday's game against Reading at Goodison Park, even if he makes his peace with Moyes. He has been a major success since his £11.25m move from Middlesbrough in August, scoring 12 goals, as Everton moved into contention for a Champions League place and advanced in the Uefa Cup."

* I realise that looking back over the past serves no real practical purpose, but that statistic in the second paragraph kinda rubs salt in the wound, doesn't it? Here's hoping "the Fonz" can make us forget that loss...


Also from the Beeb site:

"Wigan close in on McCormack deal

Motherwell forward Ross McCormack is close to agreeing a pre-contract which will take him to Wigan in the summer. The 21-year-old, who has bagged nine goals this season, has been in talks with Wigan manager, Steve Bruce. "Steve Bruce has been brilliant," said McCormack. "He told me he doesn't want me as a squad player but as someone who is playing in the first team. He assured me I will be given my chance. He also told me he believes I can use Wigan as a stepping stone."

McCormack started his senior career with Rangers and hit the headlines when he scored in a 1-1 Champions League draw away to Porto. But he was loaned out to Doncaster later that season and left Ibrox in 2006 after making just 14 appearances for the Glasgow club.

McCormack's first season with Motherwell was plagued by injury and he scored just three times in 15 appearances. However, he has blossomed under new manager, Mark McGhee, this term, putting in a series of critically-acclaimed performances.

Middlesbrough approached the Scotland U21 international last month, but Wigan appear to have won the race for his signature."

* Have we missed a trick there?

Posted by: London-based Boro fan  | February 8, 2008 12:15 PM

James Emmerson wrote...

Well last night I watched "the big match revisited" which had Elton Welsby presenting match highlights with Denis Law (!) as the 'newsman'.

I mention this because with all the guff from the PL about matches abroad etc this was a timely reminder about how things have changed.

Messers Welsby and Law both bemoaned the plummeting attendances which were a feature of the times - 14,000 turned up to watch an Everton home game that day, while Man City's 26,000 for their home game with Spurs was the top Div 1 crowd.

Interestingly Boro got a mention as their 25,000 crowd was the highest in Div 2 - for a 1-1 draw with the Mags, a certain KK getting a bar coded equaliser in a hot-tempered clash which spilt over off the pitch and led to 40 arrests and 20-odd hospitalisations in post-match fraternisations between fans.

The quality of the football on show seemed little different then to now, though, but you can see how mincy aspects of todays game are compared with back then.

But it was thought provoking watching Barnsley play Wolves at a wind-swept Oakwell and recalling how many times I'd frozen on those very terraces - one of the grounds I've seen Boro on more times than most others - and thinking about how massively removed it all is from these hare-brained proposals to export matches abroad.

Spending £12.5m on a player was unthinkable then, now it could be a nifty bit of business. Actually it's small potatoes when you think about the ludricrous desperation with which the Mags are trying to emulate Chelsea and buy success quickly - they're more likely to emulate Leeds the rate they are going.

Now there's a thought that's worth drinking to so I shall re-fill my Juninho 25 mug and ponder awhile....

Posted by: James Emmerson  | February 8, 2008 12:42 PM

Never Happy wrote...

London-based Boro Fan

I think the deal for Yakubu was a good one for the Boro. He was not interested in playing for us anymore. Not going out and buying a striker to replace was the problem.

It will be interesting to see if Moyes can get Yakubu to play and score goals after Christmas. Redknapp, MaClaren and Southgate were unable to do so.

C'Mon Boro!

Posted by: Never Happy  | February 8, 2008 12:52 PM

Nigel wrote...

The Fonz looks lean and mean to me, once he's match fit he should be great 'leading the line'. Hopefully he'll get half an hour in against Fulham.

As for the Premiership playing one game each a season abroad, one word springs to mind, greed!

What they should be looking to do is build in a mid-winter break, certainly not looking to play more games and certainly not abroad this isnt the NFL!

Fulham will be tough tomorrow, we're still desperatley short of fit goalscorers and they will feel that they are on the up, a win for Boro will go a long way to making the rest of the season a little more comfortable.

Posted by: Nigel  | February 8, 2008 1:06 PM

Holgate Ender wrote...

Seeing him ball juggling with all the finesse of Phil Whelan struck fear into my heart. It wasn't exactly Kerlon was it? Still, like you say, lacking match practice...

Posted by: Holgate Ender  | February 8, 2008 1:16 PM

Chris D wrote...

Lets hope we haven't "hyped" up the Alves arrival too much and put too put reliance on him being our saviour for the rest of the season.

Just heard he is likely to be on the bench to start tomorrow as he hasn't played for a few weeks. It seems we rarely buy a player that can slot straight in to the team.

On another note - does anyone know of any coaches going to Sheffield which may have spaces, apart from the official travel club? Looking for transport for next week.

Posted by: Chris D  | February 8, 2008 1:32 PM

jiffy wrote...

Re the PLs plan for an additional overseas fixture:

Firstly AV this issue is massive - it deserves an article by yourself and blog topic in its own right. What is being said within the club? Only Southgate has said anything so far - what do the rest think at all levels within the club? Did Gibbo vote in favour or is he opposed? As he is a self-confessed true fan I would expect nay DEMAND the latter.

As a club we have the least of any club to gain - for a start Gibson would have to abandon his shirts available only through the club shop stance if he favours the proposal as a step towards making Boro a global brand.

Boro would be the only club incapable of turning over club merchandise in the city we found ourselves playing in under the current approach.

Secondly what about the national game in the countries involved? They must be seriously worried about the effects on their local game. Ticket prices in many of these countries are the equivalent of ours 20 years ago. The locals would be asked to pay the equivalent of well over £100 in real terms to us so how could they afford it?

The Irish went mental a couple of years ago when Wimbledon considered relocating to Dublin. Now that would have been popular with fans all over the country - a weekend jaunt to Dublin has long been a big occasion amongst our 5 now 6 nations followers - it would have been sold out in the Boro no problem - but the other side of the world?

Remembering how Boro treated the travelling public with its grossly inflated trips into Europe even those fans fancying the idea might find the costs prohibitive.

Niall Quinn says its just a preliminary look - it would be January 2012 before any match could take place - well nearly half of those voting on it now could be out of the PL by then! So what's it got to do with them.

Signing a petition with the FSA has been suggested. Fine as far as it goes but nowhere near enough. The FSA has to coordinate action. It should be mobilising every PL club's supporters through organisations like our MOSC, MSS Derbyshire Reds etc etc plus via FMTTM and equvalent fanzines.

The issue demands a national protest - a weekend PL boycott - every club's fans must stay away one weekend (or 2 to catch a home game for every club) to deliver a message to the chairmen that this time they are going too far - in more ways than 1!

**AV writes: You will struggle to get season ticket holders who have paid up front to back a boycott.

And you must also consider that many clubs have long ago sold their souls to the great god money and fans have been part of that seeing that more income equalsmore and bigger stars and they don't seem to care about the consequences. We have had people on here clamouring to ditch Gibbo in favour of a foreign speculator.

The only soft spot on the bigger stage is Sky Sports subscriptions. Even that may be outweighed by foreign TV rights from these few games alone.

Locally we can put pressure on MPs, the FA and football bodies, the media and the club to condemn it publicly.


Posted by: jiffy  | February 8, 2008 2:15 PM

Scott Jackson wrote...

Only Boro fans could make such a fuss about him not doing a few kick ups.

Posted by: Scott Jackson  | February 8, 2008 2:33 PM

Steve wrote...

I've been based in Africa for the last month and have seen nearly every minute of every game in the Africa Cup of Nations. Boro need a keeper I think everyone agrees.

Please Gareth, speak to Shawky and Mido to persuade the Egyptian keeper to join his mates at the Riverside. He's class..... Cue almighty scissorhandesque clanger in the Final....

Posted by: Steve  | February 8, 2008 2:46 PM

Never Happy wrote...

I have just been reading Ian Holloway's weekly column and he is not a fan of playing PL games abroad.

The following idea was included in the article:

A colleague of mine suggested an alternative would be to play the Charity Shield in a different country every year.

This has to be a better idea than playing what could be the biggest game of the season for some teams in a foreign land.

C'Mon Boro!

Posted by: Never Happy  | February 8, 2008 2:47 PM

Nigel wrote...

Good to see Egypt and Shawky in the final.

Maybe as an alternative to playing abroad Boro and Sunderland could play one match a season at Sid James' so that the barcodes don't miss the prem when they go down!

I see Lawro has predicted a draw for us tomorrow....thats a relief.

Posted by: Nigel  | February 8, 2008 3:23 PM

Never Happy wrote...

Bloody hell, we must be improving Lawro has tipped us to get a draw.

C'Mon Boro!

Posted by: Never Happy  | February 8, 2008 3:34 PM

bradinho wrote...

Few points:

Alves not a kick-up king - SO WHAT how many keepy-ups do you need to be able to do to stick the ball in the onion bag?

Cup of Nations - Well done Egypt! A good TEAM - why wasn't Shawky playing (I missed the 1st 5 mins)??

Keeper - I said a while ago that there are plenty of keepers available, I'm sure the club are on this case.....

PS I really enjoyed the Egyptian keepers performance never mind the saves, i loved the way he was winding up Drogba!!!

Posted by: bradinho  | February 8, 2008 3:36 PM

dave wrote...

Hey Vickers, one of the boro lads said on the 3 legends O'Neil was close to being sold to bolton on the last day. is this true? I would find it hard he is our best player.

**AV writes: No, it is not true.

Posted by: dave  | February 8, 2008 3:52 PM

Owld Bert from the Western wrote...

This playing abroad malarky is worrying. If it takes off, how long will it be before the Premier League decide that they only want the "glamour clubs" in the league to play abroad, because I hate to say it if that should happen, the Boro will be gone along with the likes of Reading Fulham and Wigan.

The idiots at the FA who concocted this ridiculous idea should be sacked.

**AV writes: You mean the idiots at the Premier League.

Posted by: Owld Bert from the Western  | February 8, 2008 5:55 PM

Gordon wrote...

Av, I am compelled to write after reading about the PL overseas proposal, which equates to further long term inequities within our beloved premier league.

At a time when clubs in the bottom six are more fearful of a loss than euphoric for a win,the "seeded" overseas game could determine survival or relegation.

If the powers to be had all football supporters at heart, and a real desire to create a fair and equitable system for all, heres a suggestion.

Take two leafs from the Afl (aussie rules):

1.Introduce a salary cap.
an agreed amount of money of which all premiership clubs strictly adhere to (the same amount for all clubs)

2.A seasonal draft pick.(transfer window)which would work as follows:

All players wishing to nominate for the draft,would nominate for the start of a season.(unless under a binding contract)
The pick is then structured as follows:
20 clubs in the Premiership, 3 relegated.
17th gets 1st pick/choice from the players list followed by 16th and so on to the 1st club.

The salary caps and players available would determine how many picks each club would get.

It would also help towards a more balanced competition, and would encourage all clubs to develop their youth systems, in turn helping the English national team.

A quote from Richard Scudamore (PL chief exec) "nonetheless it is critical we retain our english character, by improving our efforts to produce home grown talent" yeh whatever.

and then.....i woke up!!

Footnote.A big congratulations to GS, SG, and all concerned rebuilding in progress, attacking, flowing football, and now the results a brilliant effort in a short space of time.

Rome wasnt built in a day, just ask the Barcodes!!

Posted by: Gordon  | February 9, 2008 5:38 AM

Redcar Red wrote...

It took a while but the AA finally arrived, hopefully he can now give us a jump start!

It took a while but the Yak has reverted to type and showed his true colours at Goodison (or not at Goodison in this case)!

It took a while (OK a few weeks) but the FA have managed to restore my faith in their gross incompetence.

Firstly we have the "Southern/North West" England squad (nothing if not consistent) then followed up by 39 games, what next, new names like Middlesbrough Steelers, Newcastle Coalers, Bolton Bengals, Manchester Red/Blue Sox, Arsenal "A's", Chelsea Cubs. Just hope nobody from the FA reads this blog as they might just take me up on the name thing.

Next Manchester Utd will be moved to San Francisco, Liverpool to Las Vegas and Aston Villa to New York, that could never happen.....could it?

If it did then it would leave the FA totally out on a different planet and the "rest" rejoining the League after the Premiership implodes!

Posted by: Redcar Red  | February 9, 2008 12:12 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertiser