About this blog

Untypical Boro is a lively topical blog by the Evening Gazette's award winning football columnist Anthony Vickers that aims to get behind the headlines to flesh out the stories that Boro fans are talking about.

Incisive, provocative and well informed it seeks to engage with articulate supporters and give them a platform to help set the agenda on the issues that matter.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Advertiser

Sponsored links


Ronaldo Gong Is A Vote For The Dark Arts

Posted by on April 22, 2007 11:33 PM | 

JULIO Arca voted for Ronaldo in the PFA player of the year ballot. He said so in the Manchester United programme, even though he admitted that some of his Boro team-mates were "not happy" at the Portuguese prima donna with the spring loaded spine.

Ronaldo was a shoe-in for the players' gong because, despite his RADA acrobatics leaving furious fans feeling cheated in his wake, he has been head and shoulders above the rest. Technically he is brilliant. He skills are sublime. He devastates opposition defences with his mercurial trickery but he is not just a fancy Dan: he is athletic, effective, astute and has a fierce will to win. Those are the qualities that the players have voted for in droves, even those who have left the pitch fuming at his penalty box theatrics because - and here's the rub - professional footballers see wha the does as not cheating but 'gamesmanship'.

Unlike fans, the players are not morally outraged by Ronaldo's ability to win free-kicks in the most dubious of circumstances in the way supporters are. In fact, they see it as a skill that is central to the armoury of the professional. In essence ALL players cheat.

All players appeal for throws when they know they put the ball out. They obstruct, kick, pull, push and trip the opposition whenever it will gain the advantage and they actively think about it and make those judgements carefully. There is a calculated approach to bending the rules that is seen as an integral - if unspoken - part of the game. If individuals they are not prepared to do it, or are not good enough at doing it instinctively they will not get in the team because coaches need to win games and will pick the players most attuned to a "by all means neccessary" mentality.

Fans can be self-righteous about the opposition players' transparent cheating all they like but if they looked hard enough they would see happens routinely and systematically among their own heroes too. In recent years we have seen examples of Boro players go down as if pole-axed by the swish of air from Nobby Solanos flick of a gloved hand, a player go down injured and then roll back on the pitch to get the play stopped, goals punched in and some classic examples of "inviting the challenge" to win penalties, one of which was instrumental in getting past Roma in the UEFA Cup and which we all celebrated with gusto.

Our own double-think allows a culture of cheating to flourish - and also undermines even the most sincere and impassioned condemnation of the cheating of others on those occasions when it is so embarrassingly obvious and when it proves decisive.

For the players it is admiration for the ability of opponents to create match-turning moments of brilliance that either fools players into making mistakes that can be exploited or fools the ref into making a wrong decision that allows the culture to go unchallenged. Ronaldo's accolade has validated the dark side of his art as much as his stepovers and shin cannons. How can players be expected to tackle cheating in the game when they are voting to praise the most prolific and proficient divers?

And it will get worse for fans with a some shreds of conscience left because it is almost certain that the "football writers", a self appointed coterie of sycophantic national paper big-hitters, will also vote for Ronaldo in their own discredited awards. Even the two faced, unprincipled ones who spent most of last Summer in a bigoted and bile spattered hate campaign to prevent him ever kicking a ball in the Premiership again, so grievous was his crime against English football will vote for him. The long ago abandoned objectivity and any notions of being the guardians of the game in favour of becoming glamour groupies and cheer-leaders for the big clubs.

If there was a fans' award Ronaldo would not win. He has antagonised, and sickened and turned away more people from the game that he has won admirers. Plus, fans have long memories and know how to hold a grudge. We do not object to skill, even when it is used to hurt us. No one ever railed against Denis Bergkamp, or David Beckham, or Ian Wright or even Roy Keane. We appreciate the good side of the game and deplore the bad. Objective fans who care for the game, however jaundiced they can be at times, are the last bastions of fairplay.

Comments (26)

tonyblack wrote...

" Unlike fans, the players are not morally outraged by Ronaldo's ability to win free-kicks in the most dubious of circumstances in the way supporters are. In fact, they see it as a skill that is central to the armoury of the professional. In essence ALL players cheat.

All players appeal for throws when they know they put the ball out. They obstruct, kick, pull, push and trip the opposition whenever it will gain the advantage and they actively think about it and make those judgements carefully. There is a calculated approach to bending the rules that is seen as an integral - if unspoken - part of the game. If individuals they are not prepared to do it, or are not good enough at doing it instinctively they will not get in the team because coaches need to win games and will pick the players most attuned to a "by all means neccessary" mentality. "

Hi AV,

I think this is the most well written piece you have done to date.

Allthough I do agree with your sentiments on the whole, the above quote says it all for me and is the reason why I would have to voted for Ronaldo if I as a fan had the opportunity.

I do not condone cheating and I absolutely DO NOT agree with the " winning by any means mentality " but I accept and approve of players trying to find an advantage from a situation that actually DOES EXIST as otherwise what would there be left for all of us to debate?

The rolling around, the delayed actions of pretending to be shot when you clearly haven't been touched, the falling over, and the winking to fellow players and coach's after your antics have worked are by far the more distastful for me as opposed to just trying to gain an advantage by going down easier under a challenge that has been made, which is what Ronaldo does MOST of the time.

Is there any difference in a player going in for a challenge with the intention of getting booked so as to slow down the play and break the rythm of the opposition ?

The key to the solution is video technology of somekind that is used only for clear cut and key moments in the game.

Morhino says that the Boro should have had a clear cut penalty on Saturday and that Chelsea should have had one yesterday. If this is true then the climax of the season could well have been lost.

Personally I do not agree with the idea that these things even themselves out over the season.

I think that it would be far, far better to have a live second opinion that is given instantly or within seconds at most in order to aid the ref when he requests it via a button that he could click from something in his hand. This still wouldn't be perfect but it would reduce these incidents and it would especially reduce the dodgy offside calls.

TB


Posted by: tonyblack  | April 23, 2007 8:03 AM

Never Happy wrote...

AV - You are right all teams have divers in them, it's just that Ronaldo seems to do it better than anyone else.

What does not help is that ref's fall for it and regularly give him free kicks for tripping himself up.

Ref's that are afraid to give penalties to the away side at old trafford should also be burned at the stake.

Posted by: Never Happy  | April 23, 2007 9:04 AM

Nigel wrote...

The reason why Ronaldo gets so much abuse when he 'cheats' is because the fans remember the world cup incident with Rooney and also because irritatingly he always wears a big grin after winning a pen. or free kick as a result of a 'dive'.

I don't believe Ronaldo 'cheats' anymore than Drogba or Gerrard or any other player, if the opportunity arises to gain an advantage a forward more often than not will 'dive'.

We the fans condone it when one of our own players does it and villify an opponent when they do it. It is an endemic part of football culture, sadly.

Given Ronaldo is not an exception he deserves the PFA award as much as anyone.

Posted by: Nigel  | April 23, 2007 9:15 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

My views are well 'blogged' on this issue.

Lets look at a couple of Boro incidents rather than re-inforce Sir Beetroot Mark 1 that we are paranoid about Ronaldoveragain.

Rochemback did a clear dive on Saturday to get a free kick. That is in my view totally out of order.

The incident AV mentions about JFH? The ball was played into the area and JFH was running on to it, the goalie came out in Kamikaze fashion, missed the ball and cleaned him out. There was no need for JFH to do anything else. It was clearly a reckless challenge, ill thought out and executed. As dead cert a penalty as you will get. If JFH had gone round the keeper stuck out a leg and thrown himself just like Pires that is diving.

How to stop it? Difficult in real time. In practice do it retrospectively. Rugby puts players on report if there are doubts about incidents, video panels review incidents, clubs can cite players. Do the same in football. If MOTD and Sky can look at incidents so can the FA. They are all spotted and shown from many angles by the TV. Half the job is done.

We can manage it for certain offences especially if the manager says it was a poor decision. If the ref misses an elbow then the player can be punished, it should be the same for a dive. Forget this claptrap about the refs decision is final.

Punishments. A booking for a dive, if it gets the other player sent off then a three match ban.
In the penalty area? Red card offence. I dont know the exact terminologies but no doubt any ref posting on the blog can tell us along with the relevant cards/punishments.

Back to ManU and the three penalties they got against. The first was a referees blunder, Ronaldo trod on the ball and fell over and the ref gave a pen - forget all the bits about intent fron Sir alex and claims of diving from us it was simply a refs howler. Boat penalty, put his hands up and gave the ref the option, nothing to do with ManU. Ronaldo in the cup match, Woodie made a challenge and my first instinct was penalty, Woodie certainly didnt moan on about it. The fact is it was three in a row and frustrating. The top clubs get most of the luck just like the penalty that wasnt given saturday night.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | April 23, 2007 10:01 AM

Diz Leksic wrote...

"Hi AV,

I think this is the most well written piece you have done to date."

I ugree, I fink dat de articull was ded well wrote, like.

**AV writes: If ee cummings came from Teesside....

Posted by: Diz Leksic  | April 23, 2007 10:09 AM

alf wrote...

Its been a disappointing season and its convenient to be able to blame our season on someone who doesnt play for MFC. The ironic thing is that ronaldo has had quiet games against boro.

I tend not to blame rival players for diving and other such things because our players just do the same. Just because a player plays for boro doesnt mean he becomes the model professional. Look at rochemback diving to get scholes booked. imagine if that meant he missed the next game and manutd lose that game. Yakubu is good at getting penalties for a minimum amount of contact.

Seems the new unoffical rules of football is that any contact in the penalty area is a penalty. surely it should only be a penalty if it was a foul in any other part of the field.

I remeber boateng faking a face injury at the rivereside once. boro players like to waste time at ends of games by staying near teh corner flag... if ronaldo did that we would have him hanged.

Really its just a case of those rose tinted specs and we need a bad guy to blame a disappointing season on, usually the ref is a good example.

Its about time managers were held responsible. One week they moan cos the ref never gave them a penalty then the following week they moan that the other team shouldnt have had a penalty for a similar challenge.

its the same for diving, no manager will admit that one of their players dives but players at other clubs are good divers.. i wonder if southgates opinion would change if he became manutd manager and had ronaldo in his team

Posted by: alf  | April 23, 2007 11:06 AM

dave wrote...

The way players go down in the penalty area with minimum of contact, i am surpised they can kick a football more than 10 yards without breaking their toe or head the ball without a skull fracture. If it is a bit windy i am surpised at how the players manage to stand up.

I think everyone is forgetting that football is a contact sport so there wil be contact when going for a challenge. Its the nature of the tackle and the power of the contact that should be considered. it should not be just down to if there is some contact there.

Its like the problems with handball. Too many people seem to think if the ball touches the hand it is automatically a free kick. Its the nature and conditions of how the ball touches the hand

Posted by: dave  | April 23, 2007 11:46 AM

Never Happy wrote...

Allegedly Man U have 4 fit defenders.

If the ref's did their job's correctly Heinze and O'Shea would now be facing suspensions, adding to United's woes.

The ref on Saturday denies Boro a stone wall penalty and then awards Ronaldivio a free kick at the other end for falling over.

Mr Beetroothead was quiet after the game apart from blaming Boro for playing a long ball game tire his team.

Read the report of the game on the Man U site and no mention of Boro's penalty.

I wonder f any action will be taken against Mr Mouriniho for his outburst.

After all Paul Jewel was punished for telling the truth after Wigan were denied a penalty which would have probably earned them 3 points at the emirates.

The denial of that penalty could cost them their PL place, fortunately it only cost Boro 2 points.


Posted by: Never Happy  | April 23, 2007 1:27 PM

Chris Lloyd wrote...

I was at OT on Saturday - great performance (Cattermole especially) - a total contrast to some of the inept dross served up in other away games.

Like a lot of Boro fans, I can't stand Chelsea - therefore Rochemback's theatrics to get Scholes booked were an embarrassment and just as nauseating as Gerrard, Ronaldo, Drogba, Owen, Diouf and all the other divers in the premiership.

If that booking had led to Scholes being suspended and missing the run in old Beetroot face would have had some justification in wingeing about Boro.

Posted by: Chris Lloyd  | April 23, 2007 1:49 PM

Never Happy wrote...

Chris - as I have posted above, beatroothead should be without Hienze and O'Shea so could have no complaints.

Not that that would have stopped him.

As for players diving and a Man U player getting booked for it, so what? what goes around comes around, apart from penalties against Man U at old trafford.

Posted by: Never Happy  | April 23, 2007 2:55 PM

david wrote...

I think the players are trying their hardest to snap Ronaldo but it needs to be subtle

Posted by: david  | April 23, 2007 6:59 PM

steve wrote...

I think it would be a travesty if Ronaldo got the footballer writers' footballer of the year award.

That award was originally for "the professional player who by precept and example is considered by a ballot of members to be the footballer of the year."

That doesn't describe Ronaldo to me. He finished 2nd behind Podolski for the Young Player of the World Cup. It was specifically stated that it was his diving and cheating that had cost him first place. Players like Stan Mathews, Bobby Charlton or Gary Lineker deserved that award.

I can't understand why Ryan Giggs, for example has never been Footballer of the Year. He's been consistently one of the best Premiership players for about 15 years.

In 1999 Manu did the treble. Giggs scored that fantastic goal in the cup semi against Arsenal. Footballer of the year was David Ginola! Now there's a dicky dancer if there ever was one. I suppose it helps if you're foreign and play for a London based club.

Somebody should start a campaign to to stop Ronaldo winning that award. Give it to Giggs or Scholes or anybody, not him!

Posted by: steve  | April 23, 2007 8:38 PM

Clive Hurren wrote...

You may not have railed against Roy Keane, Anthony, but I was at Old Trafford when he led that disgraceful charge against Andy D'Urso because - wonder of wonders - we were awarded a penalty on their holy turf.

The United protests went on so long that Juninho was completely phased and missed the spot-kick. Boro went on to lose the game to a late Beckham goal.

I've never forgiven Keane for that - he should have been sent off - and I stick my pins in his effigy even more often now that he's in charge of Sunland. Frankly, I hate the bustard.

And Ronaldo, too. Skilled he may be. But I'll bear my grudge against him for a very long time after this season and promise to flick vehement V-signs at him whenever he's on my telly. I'm usually quite a rational sort of guy, but these 2 irritate me to hell.

Posted by: Clive Hurren  | April 23, 2007 10:53 PM

Nigel wrote...

Clive - I'm with you on Roy Keane, he may be highly regarded amongst his fellow pros. but he was one of the most unprofessional people to play football.

After the tackle he bragged about in his auto biography he should have been banned from football for life.

Posted by: Nigel  | April 24, 2007 11:45 AM

Mick wrote...

Two simple equations:

Ronaldo + dive = penalty

Any Boro player + blatant foul = no penalty

How is it that Ronaldo dives and always gets the decisions, when we have a genuine case and are completely ignored?

Also, did anyone see Jamie Redknapp's view on the penalty? "It's not a penalty, look look, he just gets a foot on that." This, from one of the two wise monkeys that said that Ronaldo's dive in the FA cup replay was a definite penalty. I'd love to have heard Ray Wilkins' view on our penalty claim.

Put the two penalty claims together (i.e. Ronaldo's dive and Dong Gook Lee). Whose is the clearest cut? It has to be ours, doesn't it? But, pundits were certain that Ronaldo's dive was a definite penalty and the one pundit on hand to comment on our penalty claim said that we shouldn't have been awarded it! Even Andy Gray shied away from commenting on that one!

It isn't, therefore, only the referees and linesman with selective vision. The pundits do too. I've said it before and I'll say it again, the pundits HATE the Boro.

Look at Andy Gray. He grudging said (about Downing's cross which led to the goal): "it's a good cross, I'll give him that" No Andy, it was a fantastic cross, which you couldn't acknowledge as such. It must have stuck in his throat to say it was "good". And wasn't it blatant that Ronaldo dived when Boateng got booked? Oh no, according to Borophile Andy Gray it was "a definite foul".

If I were George Boateng, I'd have been furious for being disciplined for only saying what everyone else is thinking. I hope someone does do him and breaks both his legs. The collective schadenfreud felt across Teesside would be quite something.

Now that Ronaldo has won two PFA awards, maybe he should consider writing an autobiography. Let me suggest a title for it:

Cheats do prosper.

That should sum up his career. After all, that is all many fans are going to remember him for.

Posted by: Mick  | April 24, 2007 12:29 PM

alf wrote...

"Any Boro player + blatant foul = no penalty"


hey! Don't forget to mention that purple patch of penalties that yakubu got from some dodgy looking fouls in the box

Posted by: alf  | April 24, 2007 12:55 PM

alf wrote...

"ive - I'm with you on Roy Keane, he may be highly regarded amongst his fellow pros. but he was one of the most unprofessional people to play football. "

actually i think you are wrong there. He hated players that dived and played the game properly. I think you are confused as he played the game very competitive. It's meant to be a mans game remember! He never dived or cheated.

Posted by: alf  | April 24, 2007 12:57 PM

Never Happy wrote...

Alf - is being constantly in the refs face arguing about any decision that goes against your team a form of cheating?

It is and should be a contact sport, but you ask Alf-Inge Haaland if he thinks Keane played the game properly and I think he may disagree with you.

Keane was a fantastic footballer, however he often went over the top by being to competitive, and just like Rooney does now, he got away with things other players get punished for because he played for Man U.

Posted by: Never Happy  | April 24, 2007 2:42 PM

Nigel wrote...

Alf I'm not confused and you're wrong. Keane did cheat, diving isn't the only way to cheat. Screaming into a refs face is blatant intimidation and cheating, going over the top and sticking your studs into a blokes knee with the full weight of your body behind it deliberatley is cheating.

It is a mans game but Keane regularly crossed the line and acted like an animal. I'd rather see a dive than see a bloke wilfully end a fellow pros. career anyday. How can you possibly defend that?

Posted by: Nigel  | April 24, 2007 3:13 PM

alf wrote...

"Alf - is being constantly in the refs face arguing about any decision that goes against your team a form of cheating?"

you mean like what every other team does? eg boateng

Posted by: alf  | April 24, 2007 3:47 PM

alf wrote...

"It is and should be a contact sport, but you ask Alf-Inge Haaland if he thinks Keane played the game properly and I think he may disagree with you."

Did you hear about pogi getting a ban for breaking a players leg in russia? same at every club really

Posted by: alf  | April 24, 2007 4:13 PM

Never Happy wrote...

What fantastic eye sight Fergie must have, why does he wear glasses?

The ref’s in his opinion were right to award Man U all three penalties against Boro this season.

"I have looked at Saturday's incident and O'Shea definitely got the ball, there is no doubt about it," he stated.

Bobby Charlton commented "It's a nonsense. We've had many games when we've not had the decisions."

He forgot to add that the last match this happened in was in 1982.

The odds are stacked against all but the big four already in the PL, biased / gutless referee’s only make it worse.

Posted by: Never Happy  | April 24, 2007 4:49 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

The one thing about Keane is that he would kick players in full view of the ref, no qualms at all.

As someone who lived in Leeds in the early seventies and watched Leeds as a neutral I actually prefer the modern divers compared to the treading on players feet, studs into the back of the ankle etc regularly practiced by Revie's Leeds players. Much of it came from players like Giles and Clarke when the ref was looking the other way.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | April 24, 2007 8:17 PM

Tosh wrote...

A.V in your Blog on the FA Cup defeat your first sentence informed that even bias Boro fans would have to admit that the ref had to give the decision against Woody and in favour of the Portugese "fall guy".

I at the time,did not accept this premise at all, on the grounds that he almost certainly would not have given it at the other end. On Saturday we had the proof of this, admittedly, not so difficult or revoloutionary prediction/opinnion.

People say it's difficult for referees but there are many things their leaders at the Football authorities could do in helping them( to be discussed later), and the rest of football, to help clear up the myriad of misunderstandings and misguided views that prevail, amongst the "expert" media pundits, and "expert" punters like us, which collectively only serve to contribute to the ever growing morass of grey areas and muddied waters relating to what constitutes foul play or not foul play.

Fundamentally, what the whole of the football world has to decide,is, and as a starting point in trying to improve the management of the game on the pitch, is to establish the basic principled perception of the modern game of "soccer": is it a physical contact sport; or has it to be established as the contrary of this?

Until this happens, the schizerphrenic nature of how all those involved judge the laws of the game and more importantly the interpretation thereof will and indeed can only get worse.

Further to this, in my view, it is a key prerequisite of introducing video technology which would prove to be of limited benefit if it only served to allow different interpretations of the slowed down incident

Posted by: Tosh  | April 25, 2007 12:33 AM

Never Happy wrote...

Alf - It is not the same at every club, as Boro non penealty on Saturday proved.

If it was the same Rooney would have been sent off in the cup replay at OT.

I saw Pogi's tackle in Russia and it was poor and mistimed.

Keane's on Haarland was deliberate.

Are you really a closet Man U fan?

Posted by: Never Happy  | April 25, 2007 9:22 AM

alf wrote...

never happy, not a closet fans just appreciate world class players.

As for pogi, try telling that to the russian FA..or are they also anti boro and knew he was going to boro ;o)

Posted by: alf  | April 25, 2007 5:05 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertiser