About this blog

Untypical Boro is a lively topical blog by the Evening Gazette's award winning football columnist Anthony Vickers that aims to get behind the headlines to flesh out the stories that Boro fans are talking about.

Incisive, provocative and well informed it seeks to engage with articulate supporters and give them a platform to help set the agenda on the issues that matter.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Advertiser

Sponsored links


The Above Average White Band

Posted by on March 2, 2007 1:25 PM | 

BRANDING: the key to success in the cut-throat modern marketplace. Ask any switched-on businessman in any field from fashion to football and they will tell you the power of a product to be instantly recognised among its rivals in a hectic hard-sell shopfront scrum is paramount to on-going success and expansion.

The ability of a simple, unique visual device to short-circuit the bewildering array of ‘lifestyle choices’ and stamp a definable image in the sub-conscious is key in the battle for the hearts and minds of the consumer. A distinct logo helps build an identity, develop loyalty from existing customers and entice new ones. It allows ‘synergy’, the cross promotion of a wide range of products and services under the same brand name. That’s why companies pay slick spin-doctors and image consultants fortunes in a bid to replicate the almost mystical global market pulling power of the three stripes of Adidas or the Nike swoosh.

So it has always astounded me that when a company has just such a visible and instantly recognisable device on their hands they should fail to maximise its branding potential. Boro have just that: the white chest band across a red shirt - and they are ready to scrap it.

Strong whispers from within the club suggest that next season's kit will drop the popular white band and return to the identikit army of lower league teams in plain red tops. Club chiefs are flicking through the Errea catalogue now and are minded to switch to a mainly red shirt from one of the templates on offer.

For some in the club that will be a return to tradition. There was resistance from high up in the club to the popular clamour for the white band three years ago and an insistence that historically Boro wear plain red. Calculated by the number of season the team turned out in plain red against the years when there were bands, bids and epualettes that may well be true but in terms of self-identity, media recognition and branding the plain red is an own goal.

The simple chest band design - although historically it may not have been the most frequently used - is the one most vividly associated with the club by the majority of supporters.

Red hot iron, white hot steel. It is a symbolic colour scheme to unite the Teesside crowd. Every straw poll throws up the same response: the fans favoured home strip design is one with a white chest band. The most-wanted away strip is harder to call as there is not such an obvious historic emotional template but generally the old blue and black stripes has the edge.

Maybe there is an element of rose-tinted nostalgia involved in calls for a revival of the chest band - but sentiment is a powerful marketing tool. Not as powerful though, or as easy to adapt to modern marketing needs, as the vibrant colour and simplicity of a design with real impact.

The red shirt with white chest band is a unique ensemble in English football that is instantly recognisable across the country. And beyond. The design is simple. And that’s a good thing. A child could reproduce it accurately and quickly and it would not just be a proud parent that could approvingly identify the subject matter. It stands out proudly from the crowd - and from a distance. Even in grainy black and white tabloid pictures the design leaps from the page.

Plus with the white chest band Boro are not just another one of an Identikit army of sub-Liverpool wannabees. Wearing an ersatz Anfield ensemble or in mock Man U mode, they could just as easily be a nondescript Barnsley or Charlton Athletic or Bristol City.

Perhaps more crucially, in a world increasingly driven by the bottom line, the design is easily adapted for use when co-opting other arenas to advertise the product. It has easily been adapted by MFC Retail in shifting the mugs and flags and leisure wear to boost club income.

The image of the white chest band is burned indelibly into the psyche of their potential local customer base as being symbolic of success. It was debuted by Charlton's champions, the first period of optimism for a generation. A clumsy nod towards it, the chest bib, was in use when Boro came back from teh brink of liquidation and then went to Wembley for the first time in the ZDS Cup final in 1990 and was reworked at the Riverside for the first time in the 1998 Paul Merson promotion/Coca Cola Cup final campaign.

Crucially it has been the uniform of success as Boro stormed Europe and reached the UEFA Cup final. The white chest band has now been proudly paraded in Spain, Portugal, Greece, Germany, Holland, Switzerland, Italy and in the final at Eindhoven. It is now the indelible image of the club with a fast rising profile on the continent. The band IS Boro.

Middlesbrough marketing men could not ask for better raw material to work with. Which is why any move to dump the band would be frustrating, counter-productive and unpopular.

The annual search for Boro ‘Babes’ and ‘Boys’ catwalk cognoscenti will soon be launched ready for the Red Book electorate going through the X-Factor rigmarole of choosing a design for next term’s new away strip from a pre-selected short list from the Errea catalogue. The away strip is not so important. A maverick design - and let’s face it, there have been some real mingers over the years - will not so easily arouse the anger of the traditionalists.

But in some crucial ways the problems with the home strip are the same. Prototypes are rattled off by foreign designers with little feel for the history and traditions of the club, who seem more driven by the prevailing fads de rigeur within their company and industry. We have been lucky in recent years when Errea have dallied with such details but such a powerful logo should not be allowed to be swept away in the changing tides of fashion..

The band is design we can call our own and a tremendous aid in the project to reposition the club as a major top-flight and continental power. It reinforces Boro's unique brand and helps to underline the strength of the identity of Boro fans. It stands out from the crowd.

This is not a pop at Errea. Far from it. I don't care for the brand snobbery of thsoe who would sell the club's soul to wear an off the peg number with a little tick on their tit. Whatever the distribution problems, and let's be honest, there have been some, and whatever the criticisms of the deal that restricts sales to club outlets (Hearts have just concluded a similar deal with Umbro and I will return to that in more detail another time) Errea's last three kits have been the best they have produced in their decade long relationship with the Riverside.

The last three season's kits have been stylish and modern but paid respect to the powerful symbol of the past. They have shown how simple it can be to maintain the integrity of the basic design but make refreshing tweaks that play well with the market. They have sold very well.

It is a criticism of those in the club who would abandon such a useful, visible and popular marketing tool so easily. The band is a marketing open goal and while a plain red shirt would no doubt still sell it would not have the additional subliminal branding presence. But the production line is not rolling yet. The decision to switch styles may not be set in stone. There may still be time to persuade them otherwise. Let them know if you think they are making a mistake.

***
How hard can it be? Here's one I did earlier. Now you show me yours.

boroshirt1.JPG

Comments (32)

Nigel wrote...

AV I hope you have managed to raise this issue in time for the club to take note of the reaction before they act.

My opinion is that the white chest band is iconic it symbolises the Boro and gives the club a clear identity.

It has also been worn for two of the clubs most succesful seasons ever, 1974 and last year in the UEFA cup final.

We as fans love it, I find it impossible to believe that either Gibbo or even Mr. Lamb don't like it. More to the point surely they should canvass the fans opinion. If the white chest band design is a favourite it will sell more surely.

AV whatever the weight of opinion on this proves to be forward the e-mails to the Riverside. I'm confident the majority of fans want to keep the design.

Tradition isn't always a good thing, sticking to plain red because it is traditional is daft, on that type of reasoning Boro would still be playing at Ayersome Park.

Posted by: Nigel  | March 2, 2007 3:01 PM

Never Happy wrote...

Are the club worried that fans will not buy a new shirt if it is to alike to the one they are trying to replace?

This is the only reason that I can think of as to why the club would want to drop the white band.

Posted by: Never Happy  | March 2, 2007 3:14 PM

Chris Leonard wrote...

Here, here!

AV - please get yourself down the the marketing department at the Riverside and knock some heads together!

Posted by: Chris Leonard  | March 2, 2007 3:22 PM

Eaststander wrote...

On the marketing issue the white chest band also provides a blank canvas onto which any sponsor may use their own recognisable namestyle/logo and in their corporate colours. Remember Dial a Phone had to ditch their corporate blue and white. It's not a decision that organisations take lightly and could well jeopardise any future deals.

Posted by: Eaststander  | March 2, 2007 4:03 PM

Clive Hurren wrote...

And make very sure that they never ever interfere with the badge, Anthony. That really is an icon and means as much to me as the white band - it's the simplest, yet the most dynamic badge in the whole of football. The badge is our club.

Posted by: Clive Hurren  | March 2, 2007 4:13 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Marketing, Brand Management and the MFC commercial department. Strange bed fellows.

I would have faith that they would keep the band if I thought they had the wit to understand its value.

Maybe they will make a double anouncement, a reduction in ticket prices and keeping the band. I will just hold my breath whilst waiting. One, two, three.................

Posted by: Ian Gill  | March 2, 2007 4:39 PM

JK wrote...

The band should certainly stay, the real issue is the quality of errea is unacceptable! this years is an improvement on last years debarcle which was falling apart by eindhoven but still nowhere near the quality i expect

Posted by: JK  | March 2, 2007 4:56 PM

marty bell wrote...

why is there so much pressure to change a design that has been so popular with fans over the years?
is it just because they can ?

Posted by: marty bell  | March 2, 2007 5:53 PM

red_rebel wrote...

Every club with identity, history and ambition realises the symbolisism of recognisable colours.

Think of the classic kits in world football - Celtic, Arsenal, Ajax, Inter, Milan, Barca, Real and a whole division of others - and you know they will be the same next year. The piping might change, the shape of a collar or the width of a stripe but the colours and design are fixed.

The band should be non-negotiable. For the club to even think of changing some thing so beautifully simple and recognisable is commercial stupidity and a political miscalculation. It says to mean that they don't understand their own identity or their own market.

It can only be for commercial reasons yet we have been told that the last few years have been record sales for shirts. Why risk that and losing all the branding advantgae sto go back to looking like Bristol City? It is just stupid.

Sometimes I despair of this club's operations.

Posted by: red_rebel  | March 2, 2007 6:34 PM

Holgate Ender wrote...

AV - i have linked this blog on the fmttm site and everyone on there is agreed on this. there is no one saying 'oh, plain red tops IS the real tradition'. it is a slap in the chops for all us fans who see those colours as being boro and it is retail stupidity touching ratner proportions as well.

we have got to do something to save the white band. can't you get the gazzete to do a campaign?

Posted by: Holgate Ender  | March 2, 2007 6:53 PM

AC wrote...

As a man whose introduction to the Boro as a wide eyed 7 year old at the end of `74 I have to agree that the band MUST stay.

it made us instantly recognisable back then and it still does now. It's just a shame that due to numbering issues the band cannot be a complete band as it was back in those days but it has to stay, unlike the current Kit supplier.

Poor quality materials and construction from a brand associated with lower leagues. Get a recognised brand, not for the badge but for the quality.

Posted by: AC  | March 2, 2007 7:02 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

9600, 9601, 9602.....

**AV writes: Que?

Posted by: Ian Gill  | March 2, 2007 7:19 PM

Simon Conway Morris wrote...

Please keep the white band. Thanks.

Posted by: Simon Conway Morris  | March 2, 2007 7:59 PM

GillZean wrote...

Well said Mr Vickers.

The white chest band IS Boro to me, and when my son and my nephew draw Boro players, they DO indeed have the white chest band. Spot on.

Corporate identity that's what it's all about. I won't buy any Boro top that doesn't have a white band on it, because to me, it's not a Boro top.

Posted by: GillZean  | March 2, 2007 10:37 PM

Malcom McNulty wrote...

well said, Vic. We need to keep the band!

Posted by: Malcom McNulty  | March 2, 2007 11:40 PM

buffaloboro wrote...

The white band defines the club - bring back the old badge & keep the white band.
We want it & it pains me to think they are messing this up.

Posted by: buffaloboro  | March 3, 2007 3:43 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

AV

Stopped holding my breath shortly after the last posting, decided it was futile going purple waiting for the MFC to do something sensible.

The second posting was 2 hrs 40 mins after the first one, I am surprised you didnt make the link but there again you probably werent as bored as me last night.

**AV writes: Fair enough, carry on.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | March 3, 2007 8:36 AM

jay wrote...

White band, please.

AV have you heard the rumour about the new badge? Looks horrible if it's true. I too love the 1986 badge. And it's not often that something so new feels so good.

Posted by: jay  | March 3, 2007 8:53 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

The badge is as fundamental as the white band. 1986 was the rebirth of the club and marked a change in our fortunes and should not be tinkered with. It is the link beteewn old and new in the same way that some form of white has been on the shirt at various times in the clubs history.

I am not one who thinks things should never change but these two symbols are the Boro and should be kept. Just like the gates and statues. I can see no good that can come from a chagnge in either.

As the one of the champions of the common fan could the Gazette do some form of petition or vote through its columns, link up with FMTTM and ComeonBoro.

AV, over to you and the fanzines. What do think is the best course of action?

Posted by: Ian Gill  | March 3, 2007 10:53 AM

Rob Lewis wrote...

The band must stay - it is unique in the
Premiership and instantly identifies the wearer as 'Boro' whether this is a player or supporter.

Reverting to plain red shirts makes us look like poor copies of Man Utd and Liverpool and not instantly recognisable.

I'm sure that MFC can fiddle with the shirt design incorporating a band enough to be able to launch a new shirt each year - a policy which, by the way, I think is deplorable and against all guidelines both actual (FA etc) and moral.

Posted by: Rob Lewis  | March 3, 2007 11:45 AM

Ian wrote...

I can't believe that we're even considering changing the kit back to all red. AV, true about liverpool wannabes. That we are most definitely NOT! Nor are we Man Utd wannabe's, or arsenal.

Our kit is our identity - & seems to be a marker for any time we're successful. The stripe is to us what the white arms are to Arsenal (remember what happened to them when they went for the "traditional" mauve - About as traditional as our plain red shirt & white shorts.

Keep the band & the current logo. The logo is the identity of our post liquidation spirit. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

Posted by: Ian  | March 3, 2007 12:08 PM

alf wrote...

How far back does the white band go. Everyone seems to think it is a boro tradition but was it there before the 70s?

The club wants to maximise the revenue to you can understand that they might want to drop the white band for a few years. as there are only so many ways you can make a whiteband look different. The white band was only brought in to sell more shirts . time might be right for the club to drop it now

Anyway, what does it matter what the the kits look like, grown adults (espeicially with beer bellies) shouldnt be wearing football shirts

Posted by: alf  | March 3, 2007 2:32 PM

alf wrote...

One thig i never understood with football shirts is that why do they never produce long sleeve ones? as the majority of football is played in winter and autumn you would think long sleeved ones would sell well.

Posted by: alf  | March 3, 2007 2:38 PM

Brilliant Boro Fan wrote...

Not-quite-so-rhetorical question: which is the better chant?

"RED ARMY, RED ARMY, RED ARMY..."

"GARETH SOUTHGATE'S RED AND WHITE ARMY..."

On a technicality the latter also has the advantage of permitting

"WHO'S THE TEAM THEY CALL THE 'BORO?
WHO'S THE TEAM THEY ALL ADORE?
OH THEY PLAY IN RED AND WHITE
AND THEY'RE ((ahem, really rather good))
AND WE'RE GOING TO SUPPORT THEM EVERMORE"

Chants about team colours which quote the team's colours incorrectly are more than a tad embarrassing.

Posted by: Brilliant Boro Fan  | March 3, 2007 6:02 PM

Guy Bailey wrote...

all red with a white hoop should be as intrinsically Boro as Arsenal are red with white sleeves.

You can still do innovative and different designs along those criteria. We are not distinctive enough as a club to experiment ala Man Utd and Liverpool.

Red with white hoop is our distinction. Any expert on Branding will tell you that you throw away your unique selling point at your peril.

Posted by: Guy Bailey  | March 4, 2007 9:23 PM

Darren Liddle wrote...

Look at Arsenal, Juve, Sporting, Inter, to name but a few, each has an iconic brand that they would not dream of dropping. Tinker around the edges by all means, but can ou imagine Juve playing in anything but the black and white stripes, which they do with far more elegance than the filth up the road....

Arsenal, after a seasons nod to a centenary went straight back to white sleeves, why was that???

You don't need to dramatically alter the strip for the fans to keep buying it, the little touches and changes that refesh it on a regular basis are all we require.

Obviously the Marketing department think they know the Teesside public better than they know themselves, when will they wake up, stop messing about with OUR strip, we love it, leave it alone.

If you want to "design" something, go and find a job at Gucci, or with the skill levels we are talking about from these people, perhaps Matalan would be a better option....

Posted by: Darren Liddle  | March 5, 2007 6:00 PM

wakey_boro_fan wrote...

The white band/hoop has to be kept and worked with - personally I would like to see white shorts too, but that is probably further down the line.

Posted by: wakey_boro_fan  | March 6, 2007 3:16 PM

wenty wrote...

Just read your homage to "the white band". Spot on. Any chance of your getting some sort of petition up?

**AV writes: We'll see what feedback we get from the bit on here and in the paper today first. Maybe others will take it upon themselves to organise something. Maybe we will.

Posted by: wenty  | March 6, 2007 5:22 PM

John Donovan wrote...

The club will be making a massive commercial mistake in getting red of the popular white chestband.

It is recognised as BORO worldwide,especially after our european adventures. Why run the risk of upsetting the fans by doing away with it?

Posted by: John Donovan  | March 7, 2007 12:43 AM

Dean Armstrong wrote...

Trying to take the shirt off our backs

By Dean Armstrong

In Tuesday's Evening Gazette, Anthony Vickers questioned the logic behind the potential exoneration of the white chest band on the “Boro” shirt by Middlesbrough Football Club chiefs.

I agree with Mr Vickers that the white chest band brings a distinctive, iconic look to the Middlesbrough home shirt.

However, there is another real issue at stake. Why is the home shirt being replaced after one season, yet again?

This isn’t the first time it’s happened either. In the last ten seasons we have ten different home shirts and annual changes to the away kit from Italian kit maker Errea.

Other clubs, such as Manchester United and Liverpool, who have been criticised in the past for kit changing, switch their home shirts after two seasons.

The England International home and away shirts change after two years, giving the shirt a decent shelf life. Why can’t Middlesbrough do the same?

It’s understandable that the shirt has had to change design with for example, the introduction of new sponsor or kit maker. But the previous three years have seen, essentially, the same shirt with minor tweaks to the collar and white crest.

The away shirt, a design democratically chosen by the fans, drastically changes design every season. This inconsistency of colour and designs chosen, manufacture a shirt which is instantly forgotten about next term, a pointless purchase for supporters anyway, as it only worn half-a-dozen times by the actual team in a season.

We should adopt the approach of the United’s and the Liverpool’s of this world and alternate changes in the shirt to once every two seasons.

As we all know, the last three seasons have been a fantastic adventure: winning the Carling Cup, a successful voyage in Europe and a step into the unknown with the appointment of a ‘young’, inexperienced manager who is gradually making good progress as he learns his craft.

However, last season saw the Gazette receiving numerous letters and e-mails from Boro fans pleading with Chairman Steve Gibson to cut the price of tickets for European and domestic matches.

Football is now big business, a profoundly commercialised industry, but it also relies on the people actually participating, being at the ground supporting the team.

Middlesbrough Football Club needs all the support it can get, but the commercial madness of yearly shirt changes alienates the ‘man of the street’, the people Boro needs to attract back to the Riverside to get behind the team and be the Twe12th man.

How can they feel a part of the team when they cannot even afford the shirt? At forty pounds for an adult shirt, keeping up with change isn’t cheap for the loyal legion of Boro fans.

Say for example, a family of four crazy Boro fans who wanted to keep up with the annual shirt changes would have to fork out around £400 a season on the shirts alone.

Add to that replica shorts and socks, player names / numbers and premier league patches, and then you are looking £500-£600, easily matching the price of two adult season tickets.

Do some more maths and add to that the cost buying tickets, programmes, travelling to and from the game etc. Is it any wonder that attendances are down?

With The Sun is in the midst of a crusade to cut the price of football for the average, hard working fan, it’s time we put a stop to this replica shirt switching madness.

**AV writes: I couldn't agree more.

Posted by: Dean Armstrong  | March 7, 2007 3:02 PM

Michael Serginson wrote...

I am almost reduced to tears just thinking about changing my club's badge -my single passion in life compacted into a single image.

For what reason do we need to alter our identity that is only 20 years old?

Yes, some clubs have coincided a change in identity with a fresh and modern logo as they have moved stadiums such as Sunderland and Stoke City. This can signify a new era.

OK, others have simplified their complicated traditional crests such as Fulham.

But for what reason do Boro have to alter what I see as a modern, simple and easily identifyable crest?

Didn't we move from the Ayresome Park to the Riverside 12 years ago?

Didn't we win our first cup 3 years ago?

Hasn't the area's identity suffered enough from change over the years? Are we from North Yorkshire? Maybe Cleveland? or how about Teesside, Durham Tees Valley, etc, etc.

I can't think of any plausable excuse to re-jig the history and identity of our club and area yet again.

Middlesbrough and Teesside's identity is on the ascent. We have finally found a belonging as 'smoggies'. We have finally recognised that our strip that can be instantly related to Middlesbrough and no one else. We are finally competing for domestic and european honours on a regular basis.

Why destroy 20 years of hard work to get us where we are today? Why fix what isn't broken?

Evening Gazette, please organise a petition or vote and allow the Boro fans from Teesside and around the world to represent their feelings to the club and save what we have always wanted- an identity.

We love the Boro just the way they are!

Posted by: Michael Serginson  | March 8, 2007 2:38 PM

PB wrote...

We have to make sure we keep the White Band, but not just that, fix the Away kit as well to build on the identity.

Red with a white band for the home shirt.
Blue and black stripes for the away shirt!

Posted by: PB  | March 9, 2007 11:58 AM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertiser