About this blog

Untypical Boro is a lively topical blog by the Evening Gazette's award winning football columnist Anthony Vickers that aims to get behind the headlines to flesh out the stories that Boro fans are talking about.

Incisive, provocative and well informed it seeks to engage with articulate supporters and give them a platform to help set the agenda on the issues that matter.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Advertiser

Sponsored links


Rest The Big Guns Ready For United

Posted by on March 16, 2007 8:58 AM | 

KEEPING the season buzzing is the most important thing now . The trip to Old Trafford holds out the prospect of glory and victory there will set up a spectacular season finale of the kind we would barely have believed credible back in August.

Beating Manchester City would be a quickly forgotten short term high if Boro then come down with a bang and lose on Monday. To have an almost tangible semi-final showdown with Watford and a chance to first foot at Wembley snatched away would be a cruel crippling blow.

To that end Boro should rest their big hitters to keep them fresh for Old Trafford. We should concentrate all our fire on the replay. It is the doorway to glory and victory is paramount.


The timing could not be better for us. Man United are injury ravaged - Rio Ferdinand is the lastest to limp out after a tangle with the Yak left him with cracked ribs - and could be more so if Bolton give them a good kicking. Bolton's snarling, niggling, robust approach has never been particularly appealing to we purists but on Saturday I will be urging on Fat Sam's lads as they fly into tackles and flail elbows while playing at a strength sapping 120mph. We need that to be a high-tempo, ugly, physical bad tempered game with the highest possible body count.

And United are dazzled by the glint off far bigger bits of silverware. In order of priority they are still chasing the Premiership and the Champions League. The FA Cup is a distraction for them bringing unwanted games and awkward replays very little financial reward while they do not need the place in the UEFA Cup it offers.

It is a sideshow for them but for Boro it is the only show in town. That is why Gareth Southgate should plan the weekend with United in mind. Boro should rest some key players to ensure they are fresh and raring to go against what could be a jaded United. A jaded United is still a good team and a difficult task but having the edge in terms of stamina and strength over the full 120 minutes could be the deciding factor. We must give ourselves the best possible chance.

I would definitely rest Jonathan Woodgate - if possible. We know that at times he struggles to play two games a week so two in three days will be really pushing it. Sitting out this one will ensure he goes into the game fresh and fully fit. The problem is who else would you play? Riggott is touch and go and there are questionmarks over both Davies and Xavier in the middle. Maybe Coops should get a chance; he comes to games in full kit every week and stands on the touchline looking longingly at the action. He is clearly desperate for the call.

Likewise I would rest Viduka. Like Woodgate, the Aussie feels the strain of games in quick succession more than most and besides, he can be our most effective weapon in tearing open United's defence so we need him as sharp as possible. Yak is younger and fitter and can bear the brunt of the work against City. Give GD Lee a start; let's see if he can do the business. We know he can hit the post, let's see if he can hit the back of the net.

I would also seriously consider resting Downing and Cattermoel and giving Morrison and Johnson a game. Both of the youngsters are straining at the leash, have the talent and urge to get forward and have the pace to hurt teams. Both have added zest when they have come on this season and will relish the chance to get at a demoralised side. Maybe at a push I would give Arca a break too and ask Fabio Rochemback to knuckle down and do a job.

Maybe it is "a risk" but it is a calculated one and an acceptable one. These are all fit, talented and handsomely rewarded young players and if they are not capable of stepping up to play against a side in free-fall then they shouldn't be at the club. And it is a risk that I would be prepared to take because the potential rewards on Monday are huge.

Faustian pact? Where do I sign?


Comments (20)

alf wrote...

the players can have a nice long rest after manutd game.

WE shouldnt fall into the trap of mr McClaren and play rested teams as it will disrupt the team and start making us inconsistent

Posted by: alf  | March 16, 2007 9:59 AM

tonyblack wrote...

" the players can have a nice long rest after manutd game.

WE shouldnt fall into the trap of mr McClaren and play rested teams as it will disrupt the team and start making us inconsistent "

Totally agree Alf.

Unless a player has asked to be rested due to being tired or having a niggling injury then I wouldn't fix what ain't broke. We were unlucky here, VERY UNLUCKY and I see absolutely no reason why we shouldn't go there thinking anything but that we can win. I fully exepect to win at Old Trafford.

Having said that my preference would be for Xavier over Parnaby. Is Xavier injured or is this just a choice ?

AV, shouldn't the club be more vocal here and let us know what the situation is ? I prefer Xavier, but if GS has more faith in Parnaby then so be it as he's the boss and see's more than all of us but it would be nice to hear what's going on and for us to understand the reasoning behind player selection.

Don't you agree AV ?

TB

**AV writes: Managers never show their hand these days. Most are non-committal, plenty are evasive and some even routinely lie.

In the past they would tell the local press about niggles or tactical plans in advance knowing they were secure within theri own circulation area but now there is the internet and press conferences are televised on Sky so bosses will not let anything slip. You may as well hand your clipboard straight over to Sir Alex as do that.

Posted by: tonyblack  | March 16, 2007 12:05 PM

tonyblack wrote...

" **AV writes: Managers never show their hand these days. Most are non-committal, plenty are evasive and some even routinely lie.

In the past they would tell the local press about niggles or tactical plans in advance knowing they were secure within theri own circulation area but now there is the internet and press conferences are televised on Sky so bosses will not let anything slip. You may as well hand your clipboard straight over to Sir Alex as do that. "

I appreciate that. But GS could have clarified the situation after the last game where Xavier was on the bench and we didn't know if that was as a result of injury or not.

For me it was a strange choice as Parnaby has had a limited amount of games and wasn't seen as a first choice.

The only other logical explanation is that Xavier is to be given the boot at the end of the season and so GS is playing people who will be around then.

Either way I would prefer a more vocal approach.

Have you heard anything AV ?

TB

**AV writes: Xavier was only ever a stop gap signing so there is that. I think it is just down to form because our peroxide pal had string of mares.

Posted by: tonyblack  | March 16, 2007 12:35 PM

Holgate Ender wrote...

Id sell a kidney to beat man u on monday. if we coudl guarantee that then for me he can play gibbo and lamby as well as cooper and the kids and we could lose six nowt. thats a fair trade off for me.

Posted by: Holgate Ender  | March 16, 2007 12:36 PM

Nigel wrote...

Man Utd will be exceptionally difficult to beat on Monday, even given injuries and their main focus being on the Prem. and Europe. The eleven who play will be good and will want to win.

Therefore we have to maximise our chances of winning by resting players on Saturday. I would rest Boateng, Viduka, Woodie and Downing these are the players who hold the key to success on Monday. Hopefully we can sub Yak on Saturday when we are three up.

If we play a full strength side on Saturday we will reduce our chances greatly of winning on Monday.

I see from the Boro web site that 75% of those that voted want to see some players rested on Saturday, quite right too, this is the weekend to go for glory. We aren't going to qualify for Europe through the league. Even more importantly we want to win the FA cup don't we?

Posted by: Nigel  | March 16, 2007 12:42 PM

alf wrote...

One thing I learnt from last season is that only think ahead to the next game. Remember the FA Cup semi final which we didnt perform as we were too busy thinking about the Uefa cup semi final.

Winning the FA Cup semi should have been the priority at that time. Because in the final you are back in europe for another season even if you lose. In the Uefa cup we had to win it to get back in

Posted by: alf  | March 16, 2007 12:44 PM

Nigel wrote...

Alf surely the aim is to win trophies not just keep requalifying for Europe.

Posted by: Nigel  | March 16, 2007 1:46 PM

alf wrote...

depends on the circumstances. rather give it a shot at beat chelsea in the fa cup final knowing that we will be back in europe guaranteed than play sevilla who are a very good side and more than likely come home empty handed.

they took their eye off the ball against west ham and it cost us. they were very beatable but too many players were focusing on the uefa cup..

**AV writes: And not just the players. The crowd was flat and distracted that day too too. It was an historic opportunity missed. We shouldn't miss this one too.

Posted by: alf  | March 16, 2007 3:02 PM

John Powls wrote...

At the risk of repeating myself - changing the team in any more than a minor way for the start of the Citeh game would be a profound mistake and Gate should not do it.

If we get 2 or 3 ahead then we can withdraw some players and rest them that way - a tune up and run out would probably do them good.

Posted by: John Powls  | March 16, 2007 3:44 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Tend to agree with Alf and John on this one. Do we really want to give key players a rest safe in the knowledge they will be at the tender mercies of the staff at Rockcliffe?

The worry is the breaking of momentum that has built up since Xmas, changing of parternships and patterns of play, a poor performance affects the whole squad and can damage morale.

A further thought is the fact people have paid good money for this match. The league is the bread and butter for the club and positions mean pounds, lots and lots of them. And a potential intertoto spot.

Still, it is Gates call and he does have the luxury of knowing ManU's line up and performance before he has to name the team. Lets hope whatever he does works out.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | March 16, 2007 5:20 PM

John Powls wrote...

Grateful to hear from all of those wise folks, including yourelf Vic, on whether you still think resting people was a clever idea? After all Gate's agonising he made the wrong decision. But he wasn't alone amongst the websites, blogs and pundits. Too clever by half.

And what did ManUre do - oh, yes - played a full side and tanked Bolton in the first half, brought a few off in the second.

So do you want to argue that leaves us better placed to win at their place on Monday?

Or that it doesn't leave us ending the season looking over our shoulders again rather than upwards? The only thing that can improve this weekend is if Charlton and West Ham lose.

**AV writes: We might know more at midnight on Monday as to whether it was wise.

Besides, I don't think it was resting a few players that cost Boro today but a lack of motivation, imagination and spark. I think a lot of minds were on the cup game.

Posted by: John Powls  | March 17, 2007 5:21 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Well, or not.

So the first part of the weekend is over, ManU sent out the strongest side they could, started quickly and put Bolton to the sword early and took their foot off the gas with the job done.

And what did we do? rest a couple of players, Viduka and Woodie whilst Arca had a niggle. First half was fairly equal with a couple of chances. Euell was frankly quite poor, Lee ran but wasnt really effective.

Half time and what subs needed? As Citeh were in such a rich vein of form take off Lee and go to 441. 441 you say, well I am strugling to describe Euell's role in the match. Off we go with Yak on his own relying on his superb ability to hold the ball up and link play.

Oops, 0-1. Bring on Veruka but we go down 2-0.

To summarise; Manu go off like the clappers with their strongest team, we set off with, I assume, one eye on Monday. The decent run of form has ended, momentum lost, message given that today wasnt important - odd that bearing in mind I thought it was important enough to make a round trip of 280 miles.

The fans knew the club didnt care and responded by sitting on their hands, the players treated it the same, the three points dropped could cost us £2-3million on the off chance we can win at ManU, the paying public ripped off, forget a chance of intertoto.

Next stage is ManU, can only hope Gate has got it right or the players decide a good performance is needed.

If it goes belly up on Monday much goodwill may have been lost, there was a fair amount of disatisfaction around where I was was sitting and there appeared to a fairly sullen atmosphere in the ground.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | March 17, 2007 9:29 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

AV

I dont tend to disagree with you but it is due to resting players:

1. because we would be better with them
2. because the atmosphere has been created that leads to 'a lack of motivation, imagination and spark'.

It also must have effect on the morale within the squad with no time to pick it up, loss of momentum and confidence.

Man U have a much bigger squad but played in a friendly midweek starting with their strongest team available. They started yesterday with their strongest team and came out and destroyed Bolton with sparkling football - apparently because I didnt see it as I was driving 140 miles to see the 'match'. They will start their strongest team against us.

It is not a case where they have rested players due to their big squad and we havent because our squad is so thin, we have done the resting and at least half a flock of chickens have come home to roost. I hope I am wrong but I fear the other half are plumping their feathers looking forward to meeting up with their friends.

Lets hope I am wrong, I will happily eat a pie, humble or pork, on Tuesday.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | March 18, 2007 8:00 AM

John Powls wrote...

Vic

Do you not think that playing a weakened side was just the message our 'takes-foot-off-gas' squad needed to 'lack imagination, motivation and spark'.

Gate clearly does and has said so. Not much I generally agree with the MOTD crew about but as Hansen said last night - 'Boro aren't good enough to leave their best two players out.

It's the manager's job to make sure that the team's minds are on Saturday afternoon - not on Monday evening'.

Not a probem Fergie appeared to have. I rate Gate a lot but this was a callow and unprofessional decision. Let's hope it's not repeated and the damage is limited.

See Ian's posting too. All sadly predictable and we did predict it.

I think it will have also harmed us for Monday evening too. I was quite bullish about the ManUre game, if we'd put on a show yesterday - now I don't think we stand a cat's chance. Really hope I'm wrong.

West Ham won, of course and Charlton may do this afternoon. Our next game? Away to the Hammers. Without Catts in the squad and with our poor record on their patch.

Then we're home against a Watford side who by that stage will be freed of the shackles of having to care and we'll be prone to 'foot-off-gasness' again - and that's another banana skin. Catts missing for that game too.

And where does all of this leave the decisions by Vids and Woody about their future or who else we can attract in the Summer - the two things being connected, of course.

A couple more of our squad weaknesses further exposed too. I welcomed Euell coming here as I beleived he'd be a sound squad player. I think we're now seeing why he couldn't make the Charlton bench.

And Simba? Well, if he isn't ready now, when is he going to be? But I did say that yesterday wasn't the right time to blood him because of what I feared would happen.

Let's hope we haven't done a Macca or a Rocky on him.

Posted by: John Powls  | March 18, 2007 11:50 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

Just looked over past postings on this thread and noticed a really pertinent one. A certain Ian Gill stated that Gate had the luxury of seeing the ManU team and performance and could make a decision as to our team quite late in the day.

Do MFC need a collection to pay for Sky to enable them to know what happens elsewhere?

That Ian Gill is a smart arse. Just unfortunate nobody at MFC cant afford a paper, premplus, sky, watch football focus or check on the websites.

Odd thing is Ian Gill noticed what was happening whilst he drove up from Derby to watch the match.

Ian Gill has custard and brown sauce in the fridge ready for pies, humble or not, to eat on Tuesday. He also has some bacon and rhubarb crumble just in case.

*AV writes: Hmmmm, cruuuummmmble!

Posted by: Ian Gill  | March 18, 2007 9:50 PM

John Powls wrote...

MMMMmmmm - love crumble but Bacon and Rhubarb is a slightly odd taste combination even for me!

Very Heston Blumenthal, Ian!

Posted by: John Powls  | March 19, 2007 9:31 AM

Nigel wrote...

Resting a few players had no bearing on Saturdays result the issue was those that were playing who know they are playing on Monday were pre-occupied and didn't perform.

We should have fielded a reserve 11 who knew they weren't playing Monday. They would have been more motivated and focused.

Comparing what Man Utd did on Saturday with what GS did is plain daft. Man Utd have different priorities, winning the prem. is far more important to them than the FA cup so obviously they played a full strength team.

The fact that the Man Utd youth team captain is in Mondays squad says something does it not?

GS did make a mistake Saturday, he should have rested eleven players not three or four. We have one shot at winning acup this year and we have a hugely difficult task in having to beat Man Utd at Old Trafford so we should give ourselves the best chance to do that.

I don't know if we will win tonight but I do know its a far more important game than Saturdays to Boro no question.

**AV writes: I agree. Giving highly motivated kids a chance to prove themselves would have been better than playing the distracted regulars.

But it's done now. We need to hope that the Gate and Coops can pick them up, get them focussed - and get them practising penalties.

Posted by: Nigel  | March 19, 2007 9:53 AM

tonyblack wrote...

We ALL hope for a win tonight but if we should lose then GS will have to start thinking about what he is PERSONALLY going to do in the summer if he is to succeed here.

Going 5 in the midfield on Saturday against a hopelessly woeful, goal shy, crisis ridden Man City was a BIG, BIG mistake and it CLEARLY shows the problem with employing a rookie manager such as GS.

He has done well so far but it is these kinds of weak decisions that show how limited he is tactics wise and just how much he has yet to learn.

Saturday was one of the few days that I could afford to go to the game and each and every one of the 26 thousand odd fans groaned at the sight of the second half formation. It was quickly rectified I know but the damage had already been done as Man City seized upon this.

Our players themselves would too have been scratching their heads at such a bizarre decision and that wont exactly fill them with confidence in the manager and his team.

Coops is not the man for the job when it comes to being 2nd in charge as he is limited in the same way as GS is. He was promoted way too soon. I realise that GS wanted someone with the same vision as he but far better would have been to put in someone with better tactical and coaching knowledge and someone who would be better placed to offer GS advice.

It isn't all doom and gloom I know but you can't simply paper over the cracks. If we win tonight all will be forgiven as this is the way of the footballing world where results are everything. But if we don't then GS and his team need to think VERY carefully about they will all PERSONALLY do in the summer to improve.

I just hope that GS is a quick learner as the crystal clear signals of inexperience that he gives out when he makes these decisions will do nothing to inspire his players confidence in him.

TB

Posted by: tonyblack  | March 19, 2007 11:21 AM

Kenny Holgate wrote...

Very Heston Blumenthal,


Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo??????

Posted by: Kenny Holgate  | March 19, 2007 11:46 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

Tony Black

I am a big fan of Gate as a person and think he will make a good manager but it leaves me baffled that such an odd substitution was made.

You dont have to be experienced to know it was a mistake. A scout with a cookery badge would know it was bonkers never mind a pro licence waving, card carrying member of the League managers Association.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | March 19, 2007 3:22 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertiser