About this blog

Untypical Boro is a lively topical blog by the Evening Gazette's award winning football columnist Anthony Vickers that aims to get behind the headlines to flesh out the stories that Boro fans are talking about.

Incisive, provocative and well informed it seeks to engage with articulate supporters and give them a platform to help set the agenda on the issues that matter.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Advertiser

Sponsored links


Fatal Flaw In Iron Law

Posted by on December 1, 2006 10:20 PM | 

IN THE past few days there has been an upsurge of optimism bubbling through fissures in the concrete casing of cynicism that envelops Teesside insisting that Boro can somehow beat an awesome Manchester United at the Riverside.

That has got me really wound up. Not that I would ever knock unbridled or even unjustified optimism. It is the belief in the power of faith to engineer the unlikely, the improbable and downright impossible that is the dynamic of fandom. That quality I admire and rejoice in.

No, what riles me is the myopic and fatally flawed stupidity of the statement that inevitably accompanies wild-eyed predictions of a Man U massacre: "Well, Boro always win against the big teams." No they don't. They usually get battered .

It annoys me (althought I admit I am easily annoyed) that so many apparently knowledgable people establish their credentials as long time home and away supporters steeped in realism before wheeling out that jarring phrase with an air of scientific certainty as if its mathematical validity had been tested to destruction and pronounced sound by a legion of ace number crunchers from the South Bank School of Soccerlogical Statistical Studies.

The theorem goes almost unchallenged in the pubs and clubs, on the bus and on the phone-ins where it is bandied about with an arrogant air of certainty. This Three Legends Iron Law of Inverse Status Reversal apparently proves that Boro's level of matchday achievement is in direct proportion to the league position of the opposition. Watford = lose and play rubbish; Man United or Chelsea = win and play like world beaters. That's science. You can't argue with it.

And yet.... Boro's record against the top teams is actually very poor indeed. In fact, in recent years the team has been cannon fodder for the Big Three. Yes, Boro ground out a plucky 2-1 win at home to Arsenal last year... but we were humiliated 7-0 at Highbury, a result that is far more in keeping with the enduring reality of the power balance with the Gunners,

Last season Boro not only beat Arsenal at the Riverside but also battered Manchester United 4-1 with a famous once-in-a-generation gubbing then completed an elite triple crown by beating Chelsea 3-0 in the aftermath of the Red Book throwing watershed. But let's be honest: those results were freaks. The season was a statistical abberation. Please, please, please don't dash off to the bookies and put your mortgage on a result based on such superficial data.

Look, the year before Boro took just one - ONE - point from a possible 18 in the six games against the same sides. They squandered a 3-1 lead to lose 5-3 at Highbury and lost 1-0 in the return, they drew 1-1 with Man United and lost 2-0 and went down 1-0 and 2-0 against Chelsea.

The year before that it was four points from 18: Juninho (2) and Job scoring in a 3-2 win at Old Trafford and a goalless draw with Chelsea balanced out by two four goal spankings by Arsenal in the league (and another in the FA Cup) and a 2-1 reverse to Chelsea and 1-0 to United.

Before that - 2002/03 - it was four points from 18 with a win away at United and a gritty 1-1 draw with Chelsea in the credit column, along with the fact that Boro twice kept Arsenal down to 2-0.

The season before that it was four points from 18.... stop me if you can see a pattern emerging ... with the obligatory win away at Old Trafford and a 2-2 draw with Chelsea to boast about.

So while last season's bumper haul was very welcome, in fact, those points probably saved Boro from an undignified end of seasom scramble for survival, but I wouldn't start budgeting on it at the bookies or building into your projections for the end of season points tally. The average points tally from the big three over the last five season is 4.25. Hardly the stuff of terrace chants or commemorative t-shirts. And certainly not the title dreambusting record you would believe listening to the more one-eyed and absent-minded among the Riverside crowd.

The willingness of football fans to dissolve their logic into wishful thinking and the last good result to produce optimism is understandable - but to mak ethe mental leap from there to talk of some kind of historical inevitability is bizzare. Never mind. If Boro get battered by United we will soon bounce back - It is Spurs next and we always win there.

Comments (12)

Barnet Nigel wrote...

You never know the mood of optimism regarding the Man Utd game may just inspire the players to a special performance, so who knows we may be lucky enough to sneak a win but you're right AV I wouldn't bet on it......

Posted by: Barnet Nigel  | December 2, 2006 11:06 AM

John Powls wrote...

Vic

As a reguar attender at Spurs v. Boro I know the reality of games there. But, of course, the good times stick longer and larger in the memory.

I was at the 0-7 last season at Highury and have endured a coupe of 0-4s there in close proximity - but the 0-0 this year and the emergence of Woody still overpowers the rest - and not just 'cos it's more recent.

It's this 'looking glass' and the eternal alchemy - triumph of hope over expectation - that turns the base metal of actual results into the gold of 'we always do well against them'.

So, I'm tempted to say 'I know it was late on a Friday evening, Vic, but don't burden my hopes with the truth - time enough for that.'

But as a well known sage once said 'It's not the despair. I'm used to that - I can take it. It's the hope that get's me, every time!'

Posted by: John Powls  | December 2, 2006 11:14 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

Just what you need when faced with the unequal battle against a garden full of somebody elses leaves, a dose of reality.

I am faced with a huge dilemna. I have garnered one point from matches seen live this season either on the box or at the ground. I have the the badges of dishonour from going to all three matches at the promoted clubs. I have got my prem plus season ticket, should I watch the match or not?

Posted by: Ian Gill  | December 2, 2006 12:04 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Sorry folks, my fault, I couldnt resist watching the match. Even worse, the better half even encouraged me.

Onto some Wengerism. Did Ronaldo dive for the penalty? It definately wasnt a pen, from the replays it looked like Ronaldo stumbled after the challenge. There were no exagerated 'my leg is broken in at least six places' histrionics, no artistic impression scores. I think the ref just made a howler of a decision. The free kick was certainly an MFI coffee table - look at it and it falls down.

To be brutally honest, if we had lost 1-0 to Fletchers goal we couldnt complain. But there was always the chance of getting something from the game. The goal showed superb skill from Downing to set it up and superb finishing from Morrisson. If either had been Henry or Rooney we would have had BBC drooling over it, lets see what they say just before lunch in the test match. Sorry, we lost against ManU so it will be on early.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | December 2, 2006 9:31 PM

chris wrote...

ANOTHER RONALDO CHEAT WIN AND WHAT THE STORY MANU WIN MITH NO RESPONSE TO THE 12 TH MAN.....BORO PLAYED WELL.....SAD DAY

Posted by: chris  | December 2, 2006 11:30 PM

John Powls wrote...

Ian

I think you're right - not a dive but also not a pen. A very poor decision from a Ref who has more form than most. The tucked dive with pike in front of The Boat's matador shimmy away within 6 feet of Mr. Foy deserved 5.9 for artistic impression and a yellow card.

We were beaten by a better side - beaten, not only by a yawning gulf in attacking class (I think our defence is their equal) but by their sheer athleticism and application.

Their 2 strikers covered more ground and made more tackles than our central midfielders and were still a threat.

I still think 3-5-2 is the right way to go but as regulars will know, I'm against 2 full backs playing wide for exactly the reason we saw last evening - that it quickly turns to 5-3-2.

And if you play my friend (NOT!) the Peroxide Portugueezer instead of Mozza don't be surprised if he plays like what he is - a 34 year old who hasn't played for over a season. He was shot after 10 minutes of the 2nd half and left his part of the pitch wide open and not surprisingly they took advantage, including for their 2nd.

Once again all the creativity and supply came from Stewie and latterly from Mozza when he came on - why was he not playing from the start? And, as Ian says, the goal was one to drool over.

The Boat slumped from the Villa performance back to what we have been seeing. If he's not fit he shouldn't play. Christie made no impression at all - but was he only half fit (again!?) and Macca was yet again anonymous.

Will we get some time from Veruka at Spurs? I hope so. And the right 5-3-2. I hope Woody recovers in time - I thought Pogo looked suddenly less assured when he went off. But it will be tough. They'll be smarting from their derby defeat and have been good at home. I don't know whether my lad and I going is good omen or not - it's worked both ways at Spurs before and in away games this season.

Only 3 points from the drop zone again now. As we've said, it's going to be, at best, a grind until the window. Let's hope we are in a position to attract some decent players then.

Posted by: John Powls  | December 3, 2006 2:48 PM

dave wrote...

I suppose these thing even out over a season.last week was the offside goal by christie and this week was the ronaldo free kick. so we got 1 point form 2 games which is correct.

Not too worried about losing too man utd. More concerned with beating wigan as they are our rivals..

..That trap door is getting close again..we are due a crisis must win game and if we lose to spurs then wigan might be it. How embarrasing to see sheff utd,wigan and reading all above us and newcastle will go above us if they win their game in hand..and they are supposed to be a club in crisis we like to mock.

So come southgate show some management skills and motivate the team against wigan and get them playing as a team for once

Posted by: dave  | December 3, 2006 2:58 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Dave

There is some balancing out but if there was a table of decisions for and against I bet it would bear an uncanny resemblance to the league table.

I think it is just down to the quality of players and possession. You wont get penalties if you dont get the ball into opponents penalty areas, if the opposition keep playing balls into your box then every now and then the linesman gives the benefit of the doubt on an offside.

Onto Johns point about 352, I must admit I did post last week that it is difficult against a team like ManU with Giggs and Ronaldo forcing the full backs into a five man defence, if they dont a centre back has to come out and you have Saha up against the defence, Rooney dropping off, Scholes pinging the ball around, even Fletcher looking good.

At least we got a decent performance from the team, we were deservedly beaten by a much better side but there were some positives. Spurs may give us a chance to get some more points, Gate has to stick or twist with 352. Mozza must play.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | December 4, 2006 9:27 AM

dave wrote...

Some good points there. but the fact is man utd are far superior to boro as the league tables hows. already 25 points ahead of us.

Just thought of another incident with cheating - Hasslebaink's handball against newcastle in the last minute a couple of seasons ago. if the ref had spotted it, newcastle would have won the game and we wouldnt have got into europe.

WE all want cheats banned from the premierleague..well as long as its not one of our players ofcourse..but every club have cheats so teams wouldnt be able to field a full team if they clamped down.

Its a frustrating season and going to be a very disappointing one for boro fans and its convenient to concentrate any bad results on the ref. takes the blame away from the players.

Have a look at the league table and lets stick to concentrating on what wrong with our club rather than the refs. thats more important.

Posted by: dave  | December 4, 2006 10:34 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

Dave

Personally I have no problem with retrospective punishments of obvious crimes of cheating be they Boro players or not.

It would not take many bans to cut it out though the thought of someone showing replays of an Arsenal player bang to rights to Wenger and him still not seeing it would be worth televising.

Sadly it is a bit like the bung stories where the establishment dont really want to do anything. In my morning paper, on page two was Henry Winter giving short shrift to Ronaldo and deliberate cheating.

Page three has Alan Hansen saying it always goes on and you cant blame the players. As a golf partner of Micheal Owen and a TV colleague of Shearer that is hardly surprising.

As said earlier I dont blame Ronaldo for the penalty, that was the refs fault. If he had thrown himself that would be a different matter. If Swarz had caught him and he had gone down thats a penalty. The shameful one is the Boateng incident.

The most shameful part of all is the establishment throwing up smoke screens and burying the situation. The pundits wring their hands and say but lets not let it detract from the performance

As to JFH there was the 'goal' against Newcastle where it is difficult to be certain what happened. It looked like the ball hit his hand in a blur of action and went in - even Shearer didnt blame him. Likelihood is that if the ref had seen it the goal would have been disallowed. Not quite the same as deliberately punching the ball into the net like Drogba did.

The same with the penalty he got against Roma, he ran into the box with the ball and the keeper cleaned him out, no questions, JFH just kept running and the goalie committed football suicide. Not the same as the penalty Zakors got for Spurs where there was a foot gap between him and the defender.

These are examples of the difficulties faced by refs. All these incidents happen in real time and unless you go down the American Football route and end up with a series of set plays all you can do is let the refs get on with the job but look at contentious issues with a disciplinary panel afterwards.

Chances of it happening? About the same as me being the next James Bond!

Posted by: Ian Gill  | December 4, 2006 11:41 AM

dave wrote...

"As to JFH there was the 'goal' against Newcastle where it is difficult to be certain what happened. It looked like the ball hit his hand in a blur of action and went in - even Shearer didnt blame him. Likelihood is that if the ref had seen it the goal would have been disallowed. Not quite the same as deliberately punching the ball into the net like Drogba did."

what a load of cack it was a blantent hand ball. if you are going to bring in punishment for cheats then it has to be across the board and not be more favourable on your own club.

Clubs should be setting examples and looking at their own players. and that includes boro. we are no different. I even remember paul wilkinson scoring with his had infront of the east end against bristol rovers.

Problem is that every fans sees things through rose tinted glasses and cant see their own players cheating or faking injury.

its niave to think that boro dont have playes who cheat. JFH doesnt come to boro and suddenly stop diving because we are an honest club. I've seen rockembach dive plenty of times.

Posted by: dave  | December 4, 2006 1:00 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Dave, I may be guilty of not making my point well (for which I apologise) but not of wearing rose tinted specs.

It is not "a load of cack". I also said if the ref had seen it it would have been disallowed. It was not the same as Drogba standing on the goal line and pushing the ball into the net quite obviously and deliberately.

The JFH incident happened in a blur of arms and legs and the ref had little chance to see it. If it was reviewed afterwards as I suggest and he is guilty of cheating then give him a retrospectve card.

The point I was trying to make is comparing a couple incidents I can remember which ended up with the same result but how difficult it is for the referee. If the JFH handball hadnt been mentioned before I might have picked another pair of incidents.

We all know Boro players go down and I like it no more than you. Whenever Roch is dispossed he falls down, as Bolo used to do. Regular readers will know I have advocated the types of systems rugby use for disciplinary offences for some time now.

The really sad part is that some of the worst offenders, eg Ronaldo, Drogba, are great to watch when they are playing well.

It is not a foreign disease either. I have talked about Shearer and Owen. Gerrard, Ashley Cole, Joe Cole have also been known to suffer from MFI knee. Sheringham got a soft free kick for the famous Beckham goal at Old Trafford against Greece. And Beckham has been known to fall over.

If you cant catch them at it, nail them later. Somehow I cant see the authorities doing it.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | December 4, 2006 1:58 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertiser