About this blog

Untypical Boro is a lively topical blog by the Evening Gazette's award winning football columnist Anthony Vickers that aims to get behind the headlines to flesh out the stories that Boro fans are talking about.

Incisive, provocative and well informed it seeks to engage with articulate supporters and give them a platform to help set the agenda on the issues that matter.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Advertiser

Sponsored links


Tough Test of Southgate Steel

Posted by on July 6, 2006 10:35 PM | 

NEW brooms sweep clean. Will Gareth Southgate take the opportunity presented by a new Riverside regime to have a dressing room clearout? Hasselbaink and Doriva are already gone, and rightly so. But will there be blood on the floor in a Riverside Night of the Long Knives? Will the Gate seize the moment?

A new manager has a mandate to reshape the team in his image. It gives him a perfect chance to not only mould the shape, style and philosophy of his side but also to stamp his authority on it. There will never again be such a politically perfect moment when the board are duty bound to back his judgement and the fans are eager to give him the benefit of the doubt.

If there is to be a wholesale change in personnel now is the time to do it. Should Southgate consider a purge?

Steve McClaren shifted an incredible 24 players in his first season. Curtis Fleming, Steve Vickers, Keith O'Neill, Brian Deane, Andy Campbell, Hamilton Ricard, Mark Summerbell.... regular first teamers as well as makeweights. Admittedly deadwood wise he was working in a dense swath of deciduous greenery but his achievement in moving on players who were too old, injury prone, not suited to the new culture or simply not producing the goods was impressive. Even his harshest critics conceded it was an area where he proved a considerable success.

And it was crucial he did. Few observers thought Bryan Robson's ageing, unbalanced squad would survive another brush with relegation. The club finances were just as unbalanced with the legacy of the crazy spending spree being a wage bill spiralling out of control and reserve players pocketing £20k a week. Balancing the books was as important as bringing in fresh blood to revitalise a stagnant club and Mac succeeded in that.

Does Southgate face a similar problem? Well, he may not have a Robsonesque forest of deadwood to deal with but there certainly are problem areas, the chief of which is the number of big money players on contracts that expire next summer, most of who are unlikley to be regular first teamers.

Ugo Ehiogu has one year left on wages that were big enough to scare West Brom out of a January move that all parties wanted to go through. Ray Parlour has a year left on equally big money. Club record signing Massimo Maccarone is in his final year. And the clock is also ticking on enigmatic Aussie hitman Mark Viduka.

Southgate, until recently a team-mate and friend, now finds himself having to think objectively and ruthlessly as a boss and has some very big decisions to make. If these players are to stay they will take up a big chunk of his wage bill and the first three can not realistically be seen as first team fixtures. In a harsh economic climate they are a luxury. "Teesside will get the team it can afford" said Keith Lamb - and it can't afford them.

Not only do they soak up wages they block the route to the team to the talented youngsters coming through. Assuming Southgate has in mind a central midfield pairing of Boateng and Rochemback most fans would surely see Super Lee Cattermole as the next in line rather than Parlour. And if the bid for Malbranque goes ahead it leaves Parlour down the pecking order on the right too, probably behind Morrison and even Parnaby.

And With Southgate after Huth and AN Other central defender, with Pogotetz able to cover and with Wheater and Bates both pressing for a place it leaves Ugo looking all but redundant, especially as the boss is registered as a player for emergency cover too.

And much maligned Massimo? His stock has never been higher. His UEFA Cup goals will make a superb video to hawk around the soon to be reinforced lower levels of Serie A. He has been on loan to Parma and Sienna and although neither would match his wages he did well enough and has added to his reputation with those last gasp Euro-strikes. Realistically he must be sold NOW if the club are to recoup any of the extravagant £8.1m fee they paid. If not, next summer he will leave on a free after a frustrating and very expensive four years.

Viduka presents a different problem. When fit and focussed he is a deadly striker and should his contract run out next year there will be no shortage of takers for him. But if he does not sign a new deal soon Boro must be ready to sell now to finance a replacement.

There are areas in the team that need to be improved but, unless Steve Gibson is willing to bankroll hefty transfers and a bloated wage bill, some big earners with no future must leave first. Engineering their departures will be Southgate's first real big test. He must act swiftly while he is in a position of unquestioned power.



Comments (9)

John Powls wrote...

Vic

Your analysis is spot on. Romford Ray and Ugo will be difficult to shift - who is going to take them on? - but that shouldn't stop Gate trying to do the right thing and we have lots of cover in their positions, particularly if we secure Malbranque.

Mass will be easier to push for the reasons you say but also because there are likely to be 4 Serie B sides suddenly promoted with a sudden cash injection at short notice who may be looking for his sort of talent.

But we're less well covered for Mass. With JFH gone 1 of our famous training ground injuries, a suspension or need for a sub would leave us with Christie or Graham to call on. Neither is going to have Prem defenders quaking. So we need a replacement there but the absence of those three on the wage bill may give us head room to afford that.

Veruka needs to be sat down, looked straight in the eye and talked to. If he is on board for Gate then he needs to be secured by contract extension and maybe even made captain. He seems to respond to that.

If not, then again he needs to be moved on and his World Cup means we should be able to get a reasonable deal. But that would leave us even shorter up front.

As you say such a well considered and targeted clear out sends a message - not just about Gate's position and starting how he intends to go on (particularly with Ugo where, if he stays, Gate stands to be accused of protecting his friends, even when their play doesn't justify it) - but to the rest of the squad about their positions and prospects. By definition, they become Gate's men at that point and get an extra dose of motivation.

Posted by: John Powls  | July 7, 2006 8:39 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

The solution to Romford Ray and Ugo may be loans to reduce our wage bills.

The same route may work for Missimo but unless we get another striker in we will struggle. People have talked about Christie scoring goals for us but he didnt score many for Derby though sadly they were mostly against us.

I wont dwell on Veruka because that has been debated to death. The player who needs to be discussed is Mendi. He seems unable to last a season and when fit is either a supreme player maker or anonymous.

Mac cleared out a lot of dead wood but left us needing significant weeding. In addition the list of transfer sucesses is not endless and we have recouped little of the money expended in the Mac years. That is not all down to Mac because of the fall of the transfer market as a new realism set in.

The major plus at the club is the number of home grown players coming through, the difficulty is bringing them through to the first team.

With no european football the 'big money' stars will want to play every week never mind being on the bench. In reality there are not many who are happy to sit in the stands week in, week out with little prospect of football.

It is interesting to look at ManU who had the golden generation come through but dried up for a while, the progress of kids blocked by for several years.

We may see us becoming a selling club where we have to take advantage of the conveyor belt of kids for the benefit of the club and to give scope for more to come through.

The odd big sale, eg Downing for £10m, plus £500,000 here and there giving a regular income stream. Sad thought but possible.

And this isnt Chicken Run mentality!

Posted by: Ian Gill  | July 7, 2006 10:20 AM

Nigel wrote...

Viduka for captain is an idea I like. I'm a big fan of his. The key to getting the best from him is motivation and maybe that will come consistently with the responsibility of being Captain?

But why get rid of Maccarone? He is the obvious third choice striker and again might benefit from a new manager with a new approach.

There are some ageimg players who ideally we could do without but this is a continuous process and there is no point dumping a player simply because he's 32+ and earns a lot. What is needed is a clear strategy for player replacement and I'm sure Southgate has that.

Concentrating on the pluses we have a lot of very good young players who have allowed Southgate the luxury of only having to shop for one or two class players to improve the team.

Posted by: Nigel  | July 7, 2006 12:59 PM

frankie t wrote...

id like to see us package something with Everton,for Cahill even if it means throwing in one of the kids.Also Mac had no window to worry about when he came in. I am concerned Southgate is being told what to do from upstairs. Maybe Gibson wanted a yes man, (I hope not.)

Posted by: frankie t  | July 8, 2006 12:47 PM

michael wrote...

boeteng for captain. its time to ship out the dead meat in ray parlour and big ugo. like to see christie go aswell

Posted by: michael  | July 8, 2006 10:33 PM

Pete wrote...

Well done Anthony - I and many others have been wamping on (on the Gazette message board ) about this. You have hit the spot

In addition , I am not a fan of Pogo at left back and Parnaby has shown that he is not comfortable at right back defending against pacey wingers.

You have omitted to address Mendi's situation, which is also a problem. Boro is his pension scheme and he doesn't have any commitment or real use to us.

But well done for the article - nice to know Boro or the Gazette is not totally gagging your out-flow and independence.

And Downing? If we can get loads of wonga - say £10M - let him go , cos' we have better at the club already.

Posted by: Pete  | July 10, 2006 8:14 AM

Never Happy wrote...

Most fans seem to agree on who we would like to see leave. However any player the wrong side of 30 who has a contract can not be forced out.

This is not Southgate's fault and the only way he can prove he is not keeping players he does not want 'his mates' is to leave them out of the first team squad.

Offering these players a settlement on their contracts is an option, however why would they choose to leave for say 1 million pounds, when they can see out their contract do nothing and prehaps earn twice the amount.

Ugo proved that despite his wish to play 1st team football, its his wage packet that counts when he did not leave for WBA. Schwartzer's change of heart also was down to 'wages' when he found out no one else was willing to match his Boro earnings.

Hopefully lessons have been learnt and any players signed who are 30 or older will be offered a maximum of a two year deal. Better still, go the Spurs route and only sign younger players.

Posted by: Never Happy  | July 10, 2006 12:58 PM

Ian Gill wrote...

Never happy is right in his comments. The cases of JFH, Doriva and Reiziger before them show that the club had taken this on board at least in part.

The signing of MR Murphy to develop a database and to search out younger players shows the club is aware of the problem, sadly if they had read the message boards and taken notice they could have found that out even sooner.

Quite rightly you cant expect players to give up contracts offered and accepted in good faith by both sides but I dread to think of the cost per playing minute in the coming season for Ugo, Romford Ray and Mendiwontgetbetter. I would settle for a couple of hours for my salary this year.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | July 10, 2006 1:51 PM

Chris Gibson wrote...

Cattermole's potential is unbelievable. Parnaby, Pogatetz, Mendieta, Parlour, Maccarone (despite his UEFA heroics), and Christie all have big question marks.

I think people are being a bit harsh on Ugo. He has pedigree and can only be a good influence on Bates and Wheater. As far as cover goes he could still have something to offer. He has been a good servant and surely deserves his Bosman next year.

I like the links with Emerton and Malbranque but every player we've been linked with so far is foreign. Birmingham have some good, youngish English players who would love to stay in the Premiership. David Dunn, Matthew Upson, Jermaine Pennant?

Surely in the Riverside era we have had enough of foreign Mercenaries. For every little fella and Festa there's been a Branco or a Reiziger.

Cattermole, Mcmahon, Taylor, Downing, Wheater, Bates, Morrison, Johnson, Taylor, Kenneddy, Walker, Graham. There's something good happening here let's back it up with more English and British pride. This is not to say that the Huth's, Malbranque's and Emerton's aren't quality, it's just that after the world cup fiasco shouldn't we all play a part in giving English talent a real go.

Posted by: Chris Gibson  | July 11, 2006 4:27 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertiser