About this blog

Untypical Boro is a lively topical blog by the Evening Gazette's award winning football columnist Anthony Vickers that aims to get behind the headlines to flesh out the stories that Boro fans are talking about.

Incisive, provocative and well informed it seeks to engage with articulate supporters and give them a platform to help set the agenda on the issues that matter.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Advertiser

Sponsored links


Will New Boss Buy Boro Purchase Policy?

Posted by on June 2, 2006 8:43 AM | 

NOW I am getting worried. The club are trying to buy players with no manager in place. That is either an audacious far-sighted move to introduce a European style structure where the chairman buys and the coach coaches, or a foolhardy adventure fraught with danger.

What if the new manager doesn't want these players? What if the gift-wrapped welcome presents do not suit the playing style or mental requirements of the subsequent supremo? What if the freelance spending spree uses up all the player budget? Won't it make it far harder to attract a 'top drawer' boss if the transfer coffers are empty? And won't it make it harder to attract top quality players if they don't know who the manager will be?

Boro intend to press ahead with negotiations for Robert Huth, seemingly after the Chelsea man had been identified as a target by the previous manager. They are working on other targets too. Keith Lamb will confirm this exclusively in the Gazette later today and add that final approval on these mooted transfers will rest with the new manager.

Let's hope the new boss is just as keen on them or it is back to square one and Boro may be left with no option but to renege on deals prematurely agreed with all bad blood and bad publicity that entails. No player would sign a contract that could be vetoed later by an as yet unknown third party. Why would they agree to be left in limbo? Selling clubs won't agree either; they want the cash now so they can spend it not a promise of payment at some later date providing the new boss still wants the player.


It is bizarre. Last year with a full management structure in place and no distractions Boro struggled to get their targets in before the deadline. This year, with the dugout noticeably empty and a major soccer shopwindow display to be unveiled in Germany this month, the club are pressing ahead earlier than ever.

But they must be wary they do not paint themselves into a corner. This double-edged development could well be another major obstacle to Boro's hopes of recruiting a top notch coach. Now not only is a prospective boss being told which coaching staff he must retain, use and groom but also having players bought for him too.

Very few established coaches would willingly accept those shackles. The best have carved out their reputations by shrewd market interventions and arrive at clubs with their first few purchases already in mind and see them as key to their entire strategy for the coming years. Hiring a quality coach but then placing such restrictions on the way they work, the way that has brought success, can only be counter-productive.

But it will be good news for Steve Round. With every new development that militates against a top drawer boss arriving his own hopes of getting the job soar. He is not only willing to work within the structure, he is already part of it. Indeed, he has helped shape it. He will be more than willing to work with Gareth Southgate, more than willing to sign targets on a list he may well have been party to drawing up and more than willing to buy into the chairman's ambitious vision of continuity and a bootroom culture.


Comments (8)

John wrote...

Vic

Exactly my thoughts too. I'll be interested in what Lamb reveals this afternoon because other sources seem more than usually sure that Huth and Doula are in by the weekend.

I'm not sure about Douala, however, and the continued pursuit of him suggests Round et al is where we are going. Huth is a good bet but won't be around for ever if we don't settle fast.

Normally, I'd argue that sorting these things early is the right thing to do and we have suffered in previous seasons because we haven't. That would have suggested getting the manager early too but we haven't done that and that puts us in the bind you outline in trying to get the calibre of person we should be aiming for if we continue to box them off.

So maybe we should be braced for an announcement of Round + Gate + maybe El Tel in a part time Director of Football role - interesting that he didn't say no when asked the question on Sky yesterday evening.

Interesting also that Das Boot is quoted today as trying to persuade Gate not to do a player/coach role as he won't do either well if he tries to do both. Presumably he got told something before he re-signed.

I think that this would be very much a poor not-even-second best and the lack of excitement in this for fans will be immediately refelected in season ticket sales - maybe that's one reason why Lamb is going to tempt people with signings. I think it will make us look pretty unambitious in the eyes of prospective recruits and the rest of the Prem.

Oh dear.

On the subject of other targets Malbranque and Gudjohnsen would be good. Not Ben Watson from Palace - he's no better than 2 or 3 of our emerging young midfielders.

No more imports from the nether regions of third rate European sides - if we have to have Douala that's enough. Solid Prem experience should be our starting point.

What about trying to prize Cudicini out of Chelsea now that they have signed another goalie and if we want a right winger how about Sean Wright-Philips - his Dad must know Gate well.

Posted by: John  | June 2, 2006 11:07 AM

Ian Gill wrote...

Yes, all a bit odd.

You could suspect that the club knows who is coming and that they are happy with the players.

The other possibility is that the players coming are only papertalk.

Maybe Gibson and Lamb have another tin of paint and when they have used one to paint themselves into a corner they can use the other to paint a door to escape through.

Posted by: Ian Gill  | June 2, 2006 11:09 AM

Robin wrote...

From the limited news coming out from the club, it seems Messrs Gibson and Lamb are doing a fine impression of Stan & Ollie ( Laurel & Hardy for those not in the know ) I can hear it now - that's another fine mess you've got me into !!!

Posted by: Robin  | June 2, 2006 12:37 PM

Ian wrote...

It seems to me that becuase the club are continuing with their efforts to sign the players McClaren identified they are indicating to us that the position of manager will be filled internally.

A new British manager would not accept signings that he has not authorised. Now that Venables and O'Neil have decided not to join us it seems there are only two options:

1) Steve Round and Gareth Southgate come in as Manager and assistant player manager

or

2) Tony Mowbray with Steve Round as assistant manager.

With either option, the Chairman can maintain the legacy left by McClaren and he has loyal Boro servants. If he decides to revert to the bookies favourite of Alan Curbishly, I can only see this as temporary option which will only allow Gareth Southgate to develop has managerial skills and eventually take over.

I totally agree with the previous comments in your blog that it appears that Gibson is attempting to generate the same team structure and ethic that has been employed by Liverpool since the late sixties.

I for one hope that he will succeed.

Posted by: Ian  | June 2, 2006 2:36 PM

John wrote...

Now seen the Lamb 'exclusive'. Underwhelmed? Totally. Does this mean to say, for example, that Huth and Douala are signed up and will hold on - turning away other suitors (which Huth at least will certainly have) until whoever we choose to appoint as manager runs the rule over them. What happens if they then say no?

This is fantasy and either Lamb is spinning or he really believes it in which case we're in more trouble than I thought we were.

Rumours - and let's hope they are only those - suggest that Keegan has been at Hurworth rather than just at his Wynyard property.

Noooooooooooooooooooooo...ooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: John  | June 2, 2006 2:36 PM

Don Swatman wrote...

Steve Round ? Surely not "one from the top drawer". I think we need a big name manager of proven ability to progress, unless we get very lucky. Sure, managers want to sign their own players, but I believe most would be happy with Huth - and if we can get him, we should.

By the way, in an early posting, you said David Jack was preferred to Bill Shankly in the 50s. David Jack joined the Boro in 1944 during war time football. Bill Shankly was still a player then and eventually managed Carlisle, Workington, Grimsby and Huddersfield for 10 year before joining Liverpool in 1959, when I think Liverpool like the Boro were still in Division 2.

During David Jack's reign, the Boro were never out of the top flight and finished 6th in Division 1 in 1950/51 (after being top of the league in December before succumbing to our usual post-Christmas decline). He wasn't our best manager by some way, but we did have quite a few good days at Ayresome Park. I'm sorry I'm old enough to remember.

*AV writes: Sorry, yes you are right. It was Bob Dennison who got the gig ahead of Bill Shankley*

Posted by: Don Swatman  | June 2, 2006 5:59 PM

joseph2001 wrote...

its quite obvious the next manager is within the club allready, and will have agreed to the signing of the said targets.

Posted by: joseph2001  | June 4, 2006 3:32 PM

Nigel wrote...

Surely if Keith Lamb is 'hinting' that there will be new signings this week and that they will be cleared by the new manager the equation is simple. A new manager this week also. Its not rocket science. I have been critical of some of Keith Lambs actions this year but give him some credit.

Posted by: Nigel  | June 5, 2006 12:16 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Advertiser