http://anthonyvickers.boroblogs.co.uk/

Bi-polar Boro: From Heroes to Zeroes As Riverside Complex Hits Home

By Anthony Vickers on Dec 9, 09 11:15 AM

HOW CAN a team go from the sizzling, superlative spattered show at Loftus Road to that spineless, shapeless surrender to Blackpool so quickly? Welcome to the crazy world of bi-polar Boro, the Jeckyl and Hyde outfit with a fatal flaw.

Against Queens Park Rangers every department of Gordon Strachan's team looked effective and organised and played with pace, passion and heart.

In the five star show in West London, Boro had a well drilled defence, an industrious and inventive midfield and a front line with real teeth. It was a high-tempo, confident unit that passed the ball around quickly and crisply and got forward with intent. That awesome outfit were a pleasure to watch. It was a team that had promotion written all over it.

But the embarrassing, chaotic shambles against Blackpool was a dismal, abysmal unmitigated collapse of a bunch of timid individuals. And strangers at that. It was a bedraggled team of condemned men shuffling nervously towards the block. That was relegation fodder.

The defence was a creaking, porous mess that left enough unprotected green belt space behind them for an thriving executive housing estate. There was a failure to mark up, a failure to cut out routine balls into the box, a failure to get in straight-forward tackles ... for all three goals Blackpool players barged through unconvincing tackles in or around the box when the defender was clear favourite.

The failure of David Wheater and Sean St Ledger to gel as an effective central defensive unit sends out ripples of contagious uncertainty and it is costing a goal a game. That has now reached crisis point. That problem must be resolved immediately or it will scupper any chance of a return to the big time this term.

The mono-paced midfield was anonymous, unbalanced and ineffective and was completely overwhelmed - once again - by a five man unit that simply worked harder and moved more effectively. How many times do they have to come up against this most basic of tactical problems before they find a solution?

And the flaccid frontline was lightweight, limp and lifeless. The front two failed to hold up the ball, to buy time and space or to offer any threat to a team with an abysmal away record.

Collectively it was a complete shocker. It was certainly the worst display this season - worst than the 5-0 home implosion to West Brom - and as far as the complete failure to put up a fight goes it was the worst performance since the watershed waving of the white flag in that still shameful FA Cup quarter-final collapse against Cardiff.

Let's see them come up with a marketing wheeze to sell that!

Credit to Blackpool, they played well. They ripped open a flat-footed defence repeatedly and they took their chances well - but bungling Boro made it easy for them.

The gap between the two displays only four days apart can only be measured in astronomical terms. From world beaters to panel beaters as a caller on BBC Tees put it.
Bi-polar Boro are a dysfunctional team with a fatal flaw that threatens to derail not just this season but the entire promotion project.

Clearly this mentally fragile unit can not play at home. That is the bottom line. What has been a creeping psychological problem for years has now become a damaging full blown syndrome. The team appear terrified of playing at home. The nerves are apparent from early on and spread like a debilitating virus through the team as the match wears on. No one is immune.

Boro have now played ten games at home - almost half of their programme. They have won just three, and none in the three games under the new broom of Strachan. They have scored just eight in those games and failed to score in six of them - and in truth, blunt Boro have never even looked like scoring in half of those.

There is a corrosive vacuum of belief at the heart of the team at the Riverside. And it goes back well beyond the arrival of Strachan. Boro have won just four of the last 24 games at home... and that includes a "good" spell between New Year and the West Brom debacle when only Man United beat them.

Strachan at least recognises and admits the problem. Asked about the obvious institutional jitters on home turf he said: "There's something that fundamentally we're doing wrong here. "I don't know why they should be so nervous at home but they are. It is something that we have to deal with."

But he side-stepped a possible PR own goal and declined the opportunity to blame the fans when asked about it. "I find it surprising because the supporters are absolutely fantastic," he said. "They're very, very patient."

"The fans had every right to boo. We weren't good enough. It's not just the players - I need to go back, and the coaching staff need to go back and see how we approached this game. It is becoming a trend."

What is worrying is that the opposition are now using the tangible fear factor as a lethal weapon against Boro. Blackpool boss Ian Holloway admitted that the pressure from the Riverside fans was central to his approach.

"It wasn't a surprise the Boro fans booed," he said. "It was part of our plan. We knew that if we could get them on the team's back it would make our job far easier. And we did."

And Holloway pointed to the painful fall from grace and the problems that fall brings as a possible reason for the simmering atmosphere. "They have been in the Premier League too long," he said. "They expect too much, They have to realise that there are not guarantees in football and the sooner they realise that the better for their team.

"When you pay your money it buys you a seat but it doesn't give you any guarantees.
"Supporters should support. If they don't do that they are just football moaners. Supporters should support, managers should managers, directors should direct and footballers should just play football and keep their mouths shut. But supporters should just support. It is easier to play in an happier atmosphere."

That's easy for him to say.

**This is a remix of my Bigger Picture column in the black edged sports pages of today's old style printed on paper Gazette.

122 Comments

BoroPhil said:

That was worse than Cardiff. That was the worst performance i've seen in my 19 years watching the Boro. I am still stunned at how bad it was.


**AV writes: And you are the optimist!

Chris From Beverely said:

AV: Here are my thoughts on last night's match


There are not enough words in the dictionary to describe the shambles at the Hexerside Stadium last night. The Boro players made Blackpool look like Brazil, who’s Charlie Adam ran the match and rounded it off with a cracking finish.


I know Strachan is not Media Savvy, however, his post match radio interview on BBC Tees was dreadful. His contempt for the fans is a disgrace anyone can go on there and say “I don’t know” to every question asked of him.


Something is certainly wrong behind the scenes, and needs sorting now, not in January or in the summer, otherwise Mr. Gibson is going to find out he is not as popular as he thinks he is.


There is a danger of Sunday’s televised game against Cardiff showing more red seats than fans. Cardiff are a better side than Blackpool, so a drastic improvement is needed, otherwise a National embarrassment on T.V. is more than likely.

Jarkko said:

Disappointed after yesterday - yes! But I think the win over QPR helps here as we still can reach the top 6 this year. Hard work and possibly changing the team a bit in January window.


Also there is not the worry the fans have at Pompey. "Portsmouth directors are "working around the clock" to try to save the club from entering administration, a senior source has revealed" by Daily Express


Up the Boro - will be in top six come May!

Nigel Reeve said:

There is no easy answer to this problem, sorting out a sportsmans/teams psycological issues are far harder than sorting out tactics, fitness etc.


The fact the Blackpool manager identified Boro's weakness as being the fans attitude says it all. There is no disputing fans have the right to boo, but if we want to be succesful and be promoted perhaps the booing could be suspended for a couple of matches?


There is an excellent opportunity coming up on Sunday for the fans to get behind and stay behind the team no matter what, ironically we'll be under dogs for that match which may help a little?


To the 'other' Nigel, my apologies for making an incorrect assumption, maybe posting on here is starting to make me paranoid! For the avoidance of doubt in future I'll add my surname!!


**AV writes: You should adopt a quirky Brazilian style nickname: Reevalinho?

Ian Gill said:

John Powls will be outing me on Boro Banter but he says I shouldnt bear the blame, I am just an innocent bystander caught up in a horror movie.


I made the trip up to take santa's gifts to my brother and said I would stay over and go to the match. Intially he said he wouldnt go but he got caught up in the excitement of the moment.


I kept my secret from him and all you fellow bloggers. My home record reads 5 matches, 1 Draw, 4 defeats and not a goal. My away record is the mirror opposite.


We sat looking at each other over a beer after the match. He had that baleful, labrador type expression. The one where they thought they were going out for a walk and end up with an internal ispection at the Vets.


Where did it go wrong? Truth is that we already knew that an organised side who could play a bit of football gives us problems. Teams that sit back, keep the ball and pass to each other will eventually result in us imploding. A bit like we did to QPR.


The first twenty minutes found me playing a counting game balancing pass backs to their keeper and Lita being offside.


The cause of both is that they were ready for us and we were pedestrian. Lita kept going offside because we were ponderous in midfield, we didn't have the space that we enjoy away from the Riverside. Lita made the runs but we were too slow.


Arca was well off the pace and it was a trademark land crab twirl that gave the ball away inside our half. We then lined up to make tackles that would not stop a two legged, blind rabbit with breathing dificulties. Taking of blinded rabbits, Jones didnt move for either of the first two goals but he must have been in shock watching what was happening in front of him.


Second half Yeates lifted our spirits with neat moves down the left but they soon twigged on and when he had the ball double marked him. One defender showed him the wing and the other ambushed him as he turned inside onto his right foot.


How did they think of this tactic? Easy: it had worked with the left footed Johnno playing on the right wing.


And that, gentleman was that.

SamBrum said:

The sad thing is it really didnt suprise me. Deep down I felt it was much more likely this would happen than a convincing win.


Six points from seven games since Southgate left. hardly looking like it was all southgates fault now is it!? Fair enough we had been "hit and miss" since huth left, but now we are miss-miss with a random hit.


I think Holloway is right about the fans, but its easy for me to say that as an "Away supporter", im not being subjected to and paying for the misery that is the home performance! but we are in a vicious season ruining cycle at home.


You can see that we are a very good team of footballers in this standard from our away performance. Even three of our draws away would deservedly been dead-cert wins bases on play and chances and the same applies to one of our defeats, which makes it all the more frustrating as we are where we are mainly due to the fragile minds of our players at home!


Otherwise: Jones cant be blamed for any of the weak goals we conceded last night or this season. its the centre backs who keep messing up. i think a drastic change needs to occur here. Get sol campbell in? or put Riggott and Poggy at CB.


Yeates should have stayed in last night.

Smoggy In Exile said:

Typical Boro?


On Saturday I was out and checked the scores after the game. Imagine my surprise at the 5-1 win! Crikey. Thanks to AV for the youtube link for us non-domiciles...


Then, last night, I get in from work, turn on the computer and it's half time and we're 2-0 down. Eh? Against Blackpool? The most worrying thing is - I wasn't surprised. I almost expected it after the win at the weekend.


The home form is a Catch-22. Why turn up on a Saturday every week and cheer for 96mins or so, when the players won't turn up for 96mins and give a committed performance every week?


Why do we never want to win more than the opposition? Why do we never start games well, and go thundering in? Why bother anymore...

jiffy said:

Cant play at home it would seem. Another self-inflicted problem.


How many home games did we win last season? 5 I think it was. We had to get that sorted before anything else. So pre-season we will play all games away! Thats our preparation for the new season is it?


What's the answer? Obvious - stop playing home games.


Ground share with Darlo - its more than big enough for the crowds Boro will be getting in the new year.

Denis said:

In the fifty odd years I have been watching the Boro, last night's performance has to rank as one of the feeblest, timid, weak-willed displays of football. Not one player was able to lift their game once we went behind.


It goes without saying that the Wheater/St Ledger partnership has to be broken up and quick. St Ledger is the most right footed left sided Centre Half to occupy that berth and with alarming effect. His timdity in the tackle was shameful.


As for Wheater he deteriorates in each match I see him. Why aren't players dropped these days? The whole defence needs re-organising, perhaps Jones receiving the benefit of the doubt but full backs playing full back and Pogi and Riggott as the central pairing.


Regarding the other two let them rot on the bench or sell them,in the case of St Ledger wriggle out of buying him,(I am sure Lamb can find a way) they are no good to us the way they are playing.

David Morrison said:

It was awful last night but Ii dont fault the players 100%. For me the problem lies with the fans and the backing the team receives.


Aa lad behind me constantly shouted abuse at the team for 70 mins after every missed place pass, every offside, every time jones held on to the ball every time the players breathed.


I'd had enough so I asked why he came to the match. He said "well Ive paid my ticket and Ive supported Boro for 20 years." Great so you pay good money to come and shout abuse at the team rather than get behind them I asked? That shut him up and for the last 20 mins he actually started to get behind the team.


This is the problem not the players. A negative atmosphere in the ground creates anxiety and tension, a constant black cloud hangs over the ground and its the fans that are keeping it here.


Granted the team needs to arrouse the fans but the crowd can play a part as well.
We need to get rid of the Pigbag and go for something different, change the atmosphere of the ground and sort out a feel good factor. Clap rather than boo,


Would it have made a difference if rather than being bood at half time the crowd had picked up the noise levels and gave the team hope for the 2nd half.???


This club is on its knees and the only people capable of picking it up are the fans. Forget Gibson, Strachan and the players. This is OUR club and we should support it like true teessiders and get behind our team when the chips our down.


So what if we lose. At least we come out of it saying bloody hell we gave it a go and then maybe just maybe the players may start to believe again.


Look back at the clubs recent history and behind every major triumph has been 30,000 teessiders giving it their best. Let's get back to those times and lets get behind this young inexperienced side, we can do it we can climb above the dark clouds and we can salvage this season.


COME ON BORO!!!!!!!

Grove Hill wallah said:

Ian Holloway almost hit the nail on the head, but it is not the fans who have become acustomed to Premier League football, it is the club.


At the risk of repeating myself, the team are used to playing in the PL, the coaching staff likewise are used to coaching players for PL football. How often do we hear that there are certain managers (Ian Holloway being a prime example) who are adept at getting clubs promoted, but once promoted are replaced because they have taken the club as far as they can.


The powers that be at MFC are guilty of the worst crime in football; complacency. They said that they didn't see relegation coming, when it was plain for many of the fans to see. They assumed that a swift return to the PL was on the cards. When it became clear that was not going to happen they relieved the manager of his duties and expected the usual new manager bounce to power the team to promotion. Sadly this also seems to have failed.


The club have to face a reality check, we are where we are because we are not good enough. A clear out from bottom to top is required, this must include the coaching staff and the upper serving executives. We must start with a new mentality, a championship mentality.


We are in danger of following teams like Norwich, Charlton and Southampton. It is the law of the jungle, only the strong survive. There is no place for football as we know it in this division. We need to install a coaching staff who know this league, or we may find ourselves stuck here for several seasons as we slowly adapt.


SG showed some loyalty to Messrs Cooper and co by insisting the new manager kept the present set up. Well I am afraid that is not going to work, we need a complete revamp. Steve Gibson must act quickly, as the old saying goes Steve, go or get off the pot!


AV, will I be getting a hat trick ball?


**AV writes: No, the last one has been referred to the dubious goals panel. I think Dormo is chairing it so it doesn't look good for you.

stockton red said:

In my opinion that was the worst performance of the season. It was far more inept than the drubbing off West Brom because at least in that game you could say we were 2-0 down through ill luck.


The centre backs were as a pairing absolutely awful. Surely one of the main and obvious problems is that at home the full backs must occasionally push forward and overlap. I dont think Williams and Pogi crossed the half way line.


Osbourne does not appear to know the meaning of passing forward. Slow , ponderous and predictable with the only off the ball movement being of Lita who at least put a shift in.


Strachan appears by his selection to have decided he does not rate Yeates, Digard Emnes and Bennett. Can you honestly say the team is better for their exclusion?


Yeates did well when he came on and Digard in one movement where he took the ball past his man in midfield and played Kitson in with a FORWARD pass achieved more than Osbourne and O'Neill had in 80 minutes.


I'd like to ask all fans that watched it the following;


a]Can you understand how Digard is deemed not good enough to be starting amongst this shambles?


b]Why do we continually play Arca wide right?Surely Emnes is a better bet.He's right footed and fast with decent ball skill.


c]Why in home games do we play with full backs who cannot go forward?


I could go on and on. We have changed manager at considerable expense. We have brought loan players at considerable expense.Not one iota of improvement at considerable expense

Reevalinho said:

Hi guys I've been following this blog for ages now but this is my first post (?)
I particularly like that bloke Nigel Reeve he seems to make a lot of sense to me!


What Boro need now is an injection of Brazilian feel good factor. Bring back Branca, Emerson and Juninho sharpish and add to that the fire power of Ronaldo and we'll be back in the Prem in no time.


In fact with the samba vibe back in town, in no time at all The Count will have to dust off his planning permission and stick another 7000 seats on the stadium to satisfy demand. Mind you he'll have to make sure its season ticket only entrance to pay for it all! There we are then, problem solved!!


**Blogado writes: Bem vindo!

John Powls said:

I don't think the 'young and inexperienced' thing can be used as an excuse now, either. Of the team and bench that were out last night only Osbourne and Luke Williams fall into that category.


And a fair few don't have the legacy or taint of previous seasons' Home-o-phobia or trend, as the Manager called it.


Why wasn't Riggs on the bench last night? At least he might have steadied the ship a little, albeit we may still have been two goals down by then.


Sorting the defence - and the centre-backs and goalie in particular is the key, I think. I thought that Wheats and Ledge had begun to get it sorted on Saturday. Clearly not. And with Osbourne failing to shield them they fell apart.


As far as re-shaping goes, we have to be without Ledge after Sunday anyway and he could hardly complain on that count and on his performance last night if he - or both he and Wheats were replaced on Sunday. If Pogi is to move into the centre we aren't short of competent enough left backs to take his place.


Although Brad Jones may not have been directly at fault for the goals last night - or indeed for the one that went past him at QPR - I think he could have done better with at least two of the efforts. But the bigger problem is that, despite that, he inspires no confidence in those in front of him - nor in the crowd for that matter.


At QPR the biggest threat to Boro's dominance and their only real defensive frailty were a series of three or four 'Corporalisms' - errors of judgement and decision making that rendered the otherwise mundane and trivial a potential threat.


I also don't see him verbally supporting or cajoling or organising his back four in the box either. If they're flopping about back there anyway, this can hardly help.
I'd put Coyne back in goal for Sunday but I still think we have to look for better than both he and Jones in January.


Maybe Gary O'Neil had it right and the best way to be at The Riverside last night was unconscious.

Ernie Oglesby said:

Regarding the defensive problems...we had Southgate, a former defender, as Manager, we have Cooper, former defender as coach.


Why then, has one of the brightest defensive prospects in years (Wheater) been turned into one big festering pile of rubbish? He has been set back at least two years in his development under Southgate/Cooper.

Mythbuster said:

Ian Holloway's wind-up attempts should be ignored. What he says usually makes little sense, and this is no exception.


He asserts, in his usal brainless way, that paying customers should be philosophical about watching a terrible performance, and that only the manager has the right to comment. Even for someone well known for talking complete nonsense, that is pushing the envelope.


In the rock concert world, the players would probably have had bottles thrown at them, not some rather half-hearted booing. And the customers wouldn't have agreed that only the band's manager had a right to comment on their performance.


The performers should guarantee their paying customers that they will do their utmost to put on a good show. And that is all the fans are asking.


The problem of having recently been in the Premier League doesn't lie with the fans, as the inane Holloway claims, but with some of the players. They don't seem to undersatnd that now they have to prove that they are even Championship players.


As for the match itself, there is little to be said. The problems clearly remain. I'm afraid it was QPR that was the blip, not this debacle.


People who think this is simply a home-away thing are deluding themselves. Have they already forgotten Peterborough, the match before QPR, where the team was booed at the end of the game? Or Crystal Palace, or Preston, or Coventry or Bristol City?


If Strachan really believes that it's simply a "fear factor", things won't improve. The difference in performance arises from weaknesses which are more apparent against teams content to defend, like Blackpool in the first half hour, than teams which try to attack, like QPR.


It was naive to expect that consistently improved performances would be achieved so quickly. This is still basically Southgate's team, and we know that they were always capable of the freak good result. But they were even more capable of this kind of abject surrender.


To improve matters in the longer term, there will have to be further changes in personnel, both temporary and permanent. Several of yesterday's team now need to show that they deserve a place in the side, the two centre backs among them.


If it's too late to cancel the St Ledger deal, he needs to be found a different role in the side. Simply improving his positional discipline hasn't worked. And Wheater urgently needs to sort himself out, before it's too late. His dreams of playing in the Premier League again must be receding at the speed of light.


Fortunately, there is plenty of time, and I think that the problems can be resolved. A playoff place is the only realistic target this season, and it's still achievable.

Grove Hill wallah said:

**AV writes: No, the last one has been referred to the dubious goals panel. I think Dormo is chairing it so it doesn't look good for you.


AV, are you saying there are no places for improvisation, thinking outside of the box or an opportunist striker on this blog? I thought it was a piece of goal hanging that would have had Michael Owen green with envy, and Bernie Slaven salivating and casting admiring glances in my direction.

SamBrum said:

Mythbuster: if you think this isn't just a home thing then you are deluding yourself... Because it definately IS just a home thing.


Those games that you mention Bristol, Cov, Preston, Palace, Peterborough ; whilst non of them wins they were all very different in complexion and performance from the dreadful five defeats and two draws at the Riverside.


I went to the Coventry, Preston and Palace games and they were all unbearably frustrating but only because we played the opposition of the park in each game, looked confident and bright and on another day they could and definately should have been more like the QPR scoreline.


At home we actually look and play like a completely different team though. The defeats we've been dreadful and deserved to lose. And in the three wins we've even been poor, where as in our away wins we've been excellent.

Gavin said:

Hate to say this but Wheater is out of sorts and needs a spell in the reserves to gain some confidence, St Ledger is a liability and thinks he is better than he actually is. I could not believe his half hearted tackle for the first goal and he was at fault for the others. He is too small for a centre back and definitely not worth £4-5M.


Adam Johnson the perceived superstar gave another abject subdued display, he is not a team player and there is no end product at all in the recent matches I watched. Yeates came on and the crowd got behind him because he showed some heart.


Cant blame the keeper all the time!!


John Powls said:

SamBrum and Mythbuster


The common thread - home and away - is the defensive shortcomings.


If we'd been able to defend properly for ninety plus minutes, hold a lead and see out a game we'd have taken the three points from Coventry, Preston and Peterborough that our attacking play deserved.


We'd have had at least a point from Bristol City and Palace too but the performances there didn't really merit more - despite all the chances we made and wasted at Selhurst. I was at those away games as well - and frustration isn't an adequate word to describe the feelings at the waste.


At home, though we struggle to break down a basic 4-5-1, the second order of business - if you can't win - is not to lose.


And, if your strikers and midfield go into every game knowing that the chances are they're going to have to get at least two goals - and sometimes more - to win a game it adds pressure anyway.


They should be able to be confident about what's going on behind them so they can concentrate on a head of steam and variety of approach to get goals.


Regardless of what Holloway said about getting the crowd on the team's backs, it's obvious that teams now know what to do to get a win at The Riverside.


That usually involves getting the first goal. If they can't get it because we are tight at the back they would need to change their approach. And if we score first they would know that it would be less likely that they could come back.


Either route means they have to come out more if they're looking for a point or more from the game - and that plays into our hands.


And though the Boro fans might be occasionally frustrated with a goal-less home draw full of 100% effort and positive endeavour because the opposition successfully 'parked the bus, that would be, mostly, understood and feel a damn site better than how we're feeling today.


Sort the defence and the rest follows - home and away.


BoroPhil said:

**AV writes: And you are the optimist!


Honestly, it was so bad last night, I almost started booing our own players and considered leaving before the end.

Ian Gill said:

John Powls has reassured me it was not my fault for the result so what else could be the cause of the dismal showing.


What has changed since the QPR match and last night, GS2 certainly couldnt put his finger on it.


We had been getting better match by match until the 5-1 win at QPR that brought AV the precious relief of a hair cut.


Mmmmmmm! Vic, just how long was your hair before you had it cut? You havent got a photogaphic record of it by any chance? How long did it take to grow?


Just so we know when we can expect the next win, you are going to let it grow again arent you?


**AV writes: No chance. The Jedward was driving me round the bend.

Mythbuster said:

SamBrum wrote:


"if you think this isn't just a home thing then you are deluding yourself... Because it definately IS just a home thing."


This season the away results have been better than the home results, and it would be hard to argue otherwise. But you should think about the reasons for that. None of them is that the poor players are too frightened of their own fans' wrath to put in a half-decent effort.


As a matter of fact, I don’t boo the team, however poorly they play. But that’s just me. I don’t pretend to have the moral high ground for that, as some clearly do. On the contrary, I think that those who are booing have every right to register their protest. Last night’s match was abysmal, and it is the players who should apologise to the fans, not the other way round.


Southgate cravenly tried to blame booing fans for poor home performances last season, at a time when the club was in the worst losing streak in its history away from home. It wasn’t the fans fault then, and it isn’t now.


The reason for the poor performances wasn't anything to do with the fans. It was that the team simply wasn't good enough for the Premier League. They now need to show that they are even a top six side in the Championship. They haven't done that yet.


Making excuses for them won't help and, to his credit, Strachan isn't doing that. He says that he will look closely at the underlying reasons, rather than scratching his head and thinking it's some unfathomable "home hoodoo".


And I hope he does, because even the 5-1 victory at Loftus Road wasn’t completely unblemished. The goal we conceded there was all too similar to the goals we conceded last night. A possible collapse was prevented by a wickedly deflected shot from Lita, restoring the two goal lead. We will never know how the match would have ended if that hadn’t gone in.

redcartim said:

I might have swore at the end of my post last night which might be why I can't see it anywhere. Never mind.


It basically said we were awful and it was the worst game I have seen boro ever play and I mean ever since I started supporting.


Interesting to hear Holloway's comments, I wish our previous manager and new manager just managed. Not sure about supporters should just support, the players on the pitch directly affect the fans in my opinion - especially at home. If the players stick to playing - we will stick to supporting. How long will it be until the players attain the ability to play at the Riverside?

Forever Dormo said:

GWH - Sorry but the verdict of the dubious goals panel, after much deliberation and a third bottle of Rioja, is against you. Praise for the effort but sadly no cigar on this occasion. It will be a roll-over next time. Think of the enhanced joy if you win it then!


I suspect that Reevalinho might have a swerving, dipping shot from 30 yards out, so he might have to be kept under close marking in the future.

Forever Dormo said:

Time for some quiet reflection. We were poor. Blackpool were much better, but hardly the Barcelona we made them appear.


The centre backs were particularly poor. Wheats is in desperate need of a good game, but St Ledger had an absolute horror of a game and looked shell-shocked well before the end. If they play together in the next game, then I suggest there will never be a place in the side for Riggott. If fit, Riggott and Poggi must be worth a start at this level, or at least Wheats and Poggi (if the face mask wouldn't be too distracting, in which case Wheats and Riggott).


Has Bennett let us down in the few games he has played? If he played Left Back then that would free Poggi to play in the middle where he is much better anyway.


Why did we buy Digard if we aren't prepared to play him, if he is fit (and I assume he is fit as he was put on the Bench and came on as substitute). We paid a few millions for him when we were in the Premier League. Was he good enough there but not good enough for the Championship? Or was it a bad decision to buy him in the first place?


He seems to be OK to me (but then again he is competing against a world-beating midfield combination so it must be difficult to break into the team). I accept he has had injuries, but he seems combative, can make a good pass, and seems to have more about him creatively than most of our players in that area of midfield. So, if fit, surely he should get a start?


Are those who spent money, or advised on the deal, happy with Digard and Emnes (was he a mistake, if not, surely he must be a better bet than Arca on the wing?), and the deal for St Ledger? Think about this: Huth for £5M and St Ledger for £4M. Does that sound right?


Arca to start a game? On the right wing? And to move into central midfield if, say, O'Neill came upon an injury? In what parallel universe is that considered sensible? Can he tackle? Has he the pace to break out of defence? Has he the speed of mind to decide what to do? Or is he the most likely player in the squad to get caught in possession (in which case it might be better if that was as far as possible away from our goal)?


If Coyne is dropped after one poor game (against WBA when, to be fair, about eight others were also very poor), when does the Corporal get the hook? "I don't know what he does to the enemy, but he puts the ***** up me" (to paraphrase the Duke of Wellington).


When we had won the first game for a while, and when Yeates had played a prominent role there in his first start for ages, many of us wondered whether he would start against Blackpool. Many of us were disappointed, but not terribly surprised, when he was on the Bench. He did more in the first 15 minutes after he came on the pitch than most of the team (put together) had done in the first half. Arca on the wing or Yeates? Not too difficult there, surely? Like comparing the qualities of, say Phil Whelan at centre half with Gary Pallister.


I was almost surprised not to hear a reprise of "We've only got one man!" again. It might have been "disrespectful to the others" (if you remember that far back) but it would have had the ring of truth, and everyone would have recognised who the "one" was.


We might not be professionals but we can't all be blind can we? That was shocking. It was the equivalent of all the United bus drivers having a crash on the same day (and some of them several on the same journey), whether on their way to Redcar, Saltburn, Middlesbrough, Stockton, Hartlepool, Yarm or Darlington.


We can all have a bad day at the office. But if you had lots of bad days, a surprise good one, and then an horrifically bad one, you would start to worry whether you are doing something wrong, or whether you are working at the right sort of office. But if the whole office has a bad day at the same time, you would have to ask some questions. Is David Brent making the decisions?


Sorry for all the questions, but after that display, surely some answers are required. It can't all be down to the ST holders, surely?

Redcar Red said:

Its very clear that Saturday was a "one-off" and probably more down to QPR having a bad day at the office rather than our tactical brilliance after all. Oh well there was no harm in hoping (and dreaming). It hurts me to say it but there is simply no other explanation for such extremes in the matter of a few days. Or is there?


The re-shuffled team after their best performance this season, square peg syndrome and a defensive pairing that has "don't panic Mr. Mannering" stamped all over it all adds up to some very contrary and questionable coaching techniques, "Deja Vu".


Whatever the cause I doubt very much if anyone at MFC has a Scooby about how to fix it now. The fans are seeing through the very thin veneer of abrupt monosyllabic responses to reasonable questions, the deafening silence of the Lamb and the tatters of the once teflon coated SG lay testimony to the sorry state of our Boro.


Memories of the last Cardiff game are still fresh in the memory, add that to the total capitulation and shambolic defending at the Riverside this year and it all adds to the inevitable heightened tension coming up next.


The slightest cough or splutter will be the catalyst for a cacophony of boo's, jeers, chants and abuse directed at the club, cue Mark Page and a repeat of his volume control Big Brother performance!

Kev B said:

We'll get the same abject performance on Sunday unless Strachan makes some major changes to the team, starting with the truly awful centre back "partnership" of Wheater and St Ledger. Did you ever see such a tragic display?


I cannot even bring myself to write about it ... it just makes me even more depressed to recall it, but I do agree with your comments AV.


As for the fans, well, I do tend to agree with the train of thought that fans who are just waiting to boo at any given opportunity are not helping matters. Lord, the North stand were booing Jones last night after the second goal went in, just re-enforcing my belief that we have some of the most uneducated fans in the country.


But then again, though I cannot see a time when I join in, it takes the patience of a saint not to boo this season, at home at least. The two jokers who sit behind me are laughable in their comments and condemnation, and last night I finally snapped. But they are only human.


I'm contemplating staying in the warmth of the Navi on Sunday to watch the latest home horror show instead of making the perilous journey to the stadium. Care to join me?


braveheart1 said:

Well, Gordon must be scratching his head after last nights performance..question is will he get it right? My opinion is he will but it will take time.


As a scot I know that Gordon had four successful years at Celtic. Ok I know you will say the SPL is a mickey mouse league but strachan had 60,000 fans supporting the club every home game and he had a very successful champions league run...any football fan will tell you that a european night at parkhead is very special.


In scotland every team wants to beat the likes of celtic and rangers and they tend to play out of their skin when they play them. The point I am trying to make is that while at celtic Gordon was under extreme pressure with him having to answer to 60,000 fans the type of football he played , the players he bought etc all under intense scrutiny. Tony Mowbray has found out in the last few weeks how intense being a celtic manager is


So I am confident that gordon will sort this lot out at middlesbrough By january he will know who he wants in his team .I only hope the long suffering supporters stick with the club as we go through this change which in reality should have happened a lot earlier

Forever Dormo said:

And no, before you ask, I didn't boo at the end. The display merited it, and it would have been no more than the team deserved. But I felt so sickened that I just couldn't bring myself to do it. However if it carries on like that......

halifaxp said:

Don't stay in the Navi, Kev B. Now is the time when the club needs you!

Si said:

Well. What with this home/away dilemma still bugging us, some words from Roy Keane's autobiography have hit home:


"(During a fortunate, scrappy 1-0 win over Dynamo Kiev) The crowd was curiously quiet. It was as if they'd resented the absence of the spectacle they'd come to see. A goal-fest...and the crowd were swinging from the rafters. What about the hard days and nights, when you needed a lift from your own supporters?"


He then goes on to praise how fantastic the away fans are before criticising the home fans who are in danger of losing the plot.


Remind you of anyone at this moment in time? The Riverside was a fortress in 1997/98 because we helped to make it one. Too many of the squad, the coaching staff and the fans still seem to have their heads in the Premiership...or even Eindhoven.


But then, maybe it isn't the fans. After all, that team of a decade ago was much stronger mentally than this one. We were more than happy to direct plenty of criticism at McClaren's teams, and yet compared to what we have today...


Or maybe it's just typical Boro, again. Who knows, we might actually beat Cardiff...

Ian Gill said:

AV


If your Jedward was driving you round the bend what do you think a 280 mile round trip is doing for me? And I dont get paid for the pleasure.


I cant get to the Riverside every home match but I havent seen a goal there yet this season. I missed the early wins because I was on holiday.


If you are not going to grow your hair I will have to resort to away games only to see if we can resolve our home form.


An easier solution might be to try starting the match with some tempo.


I am going to stick up a bit for the defence, not a lot, shocking though they were. If our midfield allows their opposite to run unhindered at our defence with the freedom to pick a pass at will any defence will look shaky. They cant launch players into row z anymore.


We cannot control the football at home and end up looking lost.


But I have had enough of trying to rationalise the Boro. It is bad enough trying to write something coherent (or not) elsewhere without doing it here as well. I think I will have a break for a day or two (unless a poachers chance turns up to get in front of Dormo)

Matt said:

I know Brad Jones receives a lot of stick from our fans, so I thought I would have a look at the stats. I always thought that young skippy was a good shot stopper, but poor at commanding his area or catching crosses.


Just have a look at the stats from the last few matches & make your own mind up.


QPR:
Shots on target - 2. Goals - 1.
Peterborough:
Shots on target - 4. Goals - 2.
Blackpool:
Shots on target - 5. Goals - 3.


As a general rule, out of every two shots that the opposition get on target, one goes in !! I'm not sure we will need to worry about fighting off bids for our 1st choice keeper this January. His saves to shots ratio must be as poor as any other keeper in the League at the moment. Put simply, this is not good enough & I sincerely hope our manager is looking to address this situation in January.


Do not get me wrong, I do not believe that Mr Jones is the only problem in our side. It is plainly obvious that St Ledger & Wheater have not gelled since the arrival of our Irish newbie. We sold Huth for £5M then replaced him with St Ledger for £4M. That's like swapping your Porsche for a Delorean. They may both be expensive & look good, but while you would be sure the Porsche would start first time on a frosty December morning, you would never be quite as confident about the Delorean !


Although, to prove that it is possible for anyone to have an "off day" Coyne has not exactly been without fault this season.


West Brom:
Shots on target - 6. Goals - 5.

Boro-Russ said:

AV I'm coming back to say 5 cup finals Is great to be in - but we only won one and have been relegated twice. To me that's not progression. The team has been a complete failure! And for us fans to be paying that type of money to watch rubbish and get nothing back from the club Is a total sub zero!


First Gibson could of came out and done when relegated was to slash tickets for the fans so we could of believed In Captain Fantastic Southgate too bring us straight back up. It didnt happen and Gibson has you recalled wouldnt make Southgate A SCAPEGOAT!


To me he has just done that and to me a succesful club Is winning trophies and banging on the door of the top four In The Premiership! Other than that we might has well be In Scottish Premiership and qualifying through that League to gain Champions League Football!


Up The Boro Football Club !Sack Gibsons And Lambs And the hangers on who dont support The Club.

John Gibson said:

Oct 20th: Boro 23 points, NUFC 24 pts


Southgate bulleted!


Dec 9th Boro 29 pts, NUFC 45 pts


What was that about the 'circus' at Sid James Park? I hope the clowns are still on show next week - we'll need them.


John, Aus

Patterdale said:

Once again this was a disgraceful performance by Boro.


Wheater and St. Ledger are not a partnership in any form. They both should be dropped and Pogi and Riggot put into the centre.


Jones is rubbish in goal. Bring back Coyne.


Steve Gibson has in my opinion been too busy lately with his Rockcliffe Hall development and has lost interest in the club and lost the 'support' of a lot of fans.


It would be interesting if the players were paid only on results, say a basic wage then extra for wins. Not many would be driving around in their Hundred thousand pounds cars then I bet.

dave connor said:

So in response to the "rose coloured glasses brigade above" you now want to blame the fans. WHAT A JOKE YOU LOT ARE. It is the players who generate the happiness of the fans. It is not the fans who make them play better.


This is one of the worst BORO teams ever and I have seen them all for nearly 55 years. The defence is a joke, the keeper one of the worst in the league, why oh why do they continue with Poltergist at left back he has been a disaster in the position every time he has played there, he is a central defender.


We have a none-existant mid field. we have a winger (Johnston) who started well but has proven he is only a few games player. He has lost his early season form. This team is abysmal. And I have supported this team with good money for season tickets which I stopped 2 years ago.


This team is only going one way and it is certainly NOT UP.

dave connor said:

AND to think we all thought Newcastle would be the joke team this year. at least they have bottle and fight.

'Ignorant' of boroland said:

When you see terrorists trying to break a mans spirit on a war film with torture and sleep deprivation - Well that's NOWT! Try supporting the BORO!


I feel utterly dispirited!

sick as a parott said:

AV is the St Ledger deal a done deal? Surely £4m million can be better spent elsewhere.


C'Mon Boro!


**AV writes: It has never been confirmed at this end but oir understanding is that yes, it is a done deal.

halifaxp said:

This continuing war between pro-GS1 and pro-GS2 factions has long been boring. The logic is pretty clear: most people agreed that (under GS1) things were not right; things are still not right. It's not an either/or debate!


GS1 had the victory over Liverpool; GS2 over QPR. On both of these occasions, the players played as a team and looked capable of beating any side.


I was a Southgate fan. I am now quite prepared to support Strachan. Nothing else is consistent with being a long-term and passionate Boro fan.


What disturbs me is the huge disparity between what I saw at Loftus Road and what I saw at the Riverside on Tuesday. There MUST be something wrong with the mentality of the players. Nothing else makes sense.


They looked really happy at QPR; they were enjoying playing as a team there; they were skilful in controlling the ball, looking for good options when they had got it under control, making forward passes, making strong tackles and making intelligent runs for each other, and the finishing was very good. In short, they looked as if they were happy to do what they are paid to do.


I foolishly predicted that this was so convincing that they MUST have turned a corner! It seemed certain that the lads, having found how much fun it was to do their work properly, how much love they got from us supporters, etc., would go back to Teesside thinking about what made their game so good and clinging on to the vibe of togetherness. That, after all, is what a professional would do after a good performance, reflect on it, savour it and seek to learn the good lessons so they could be repeated.


Sorry about this ramble, but here's my point: these lads CANNOT be called good professionals. Either they got drunk on Saturday or Sunday or both because they felt they'd earned the right to do so (after all, this week they had EARNED their corn!) or they felt that they were supermen and this was now so clearly proved that they did not therefore need to prepare for Blackpool.


So, I conclude, that, while these players are technically capable of being good professional footballers, they are not mature or responsible enough to make it and need to grow up fast if they are to turn things round.


Gareth couldn't do this - and I would hope the most rabid anti-Southgate people might begin to see that he must have really had his work cut out - because the transformation from Saturday to Tuesday was so very extreme as to be like a mental or moral disease.


(Mark Yeates, Pogatetz, Digard, O'Neil and Brad Jones can be exempted from the above observations. Osbourne, I would hope, has not been here long enough to be infected with the Big I AM syndrome.)


The others should all be dropped for Cardiff and sent for a bit of arrogance counselling. (If we wanted to be nice we could say to them that we were sending them for help to deal with the recurrent, nightmarish visions they have been having of red, plastic seats everywhere.)


I would also drop Jones and send him to learn with Stephen Pears how to talk to the back four. We could use Wheater, St. Ledger, Williams and McMahon as role players - so they would actually earn some of their wages by being static (until Brad tells them to move). I think I am showing signs of real coaching skill here, as well as financial acumen and thinking out of the box!! If they do their job well, they can play for the reserves next week, so that'll be a nice incentive for them.


Sunday's team would be as follows:


Coyne: Hoyte, Riggott, Pogatetz, Bennett: O'Neil, Digard, Osbourne, Yeates: L.Williams, Franks - they would certainly do a better job than the shower that played the other day, and I'd put Reserves and Academy players on the bench. This would be a good way to avoid national humiliation - and also, perhaps, to avoid putting off any would-be transfers in when we shift out the dead wood in January.


There! Sorted!


**AV writes: I like the concept of "arrogance couselling."

stockton red said:

It was interesting to see halifaxp's projected team for Sunday. I had something similar in mind although I would disagree with him on a couple of things.


Strachan HAS to send out a message that half hearted effort is simply not on. The two centre halves need leaving out-you wouldnt back this team to keep a clean sheet against a non-league team and the midfield must compete with the opposition and close down and graft.


I honestly dont see Osbourne doing anything that Williams cannot do in that position. Up front I would give Kitson and Lita another chance.After the two previous efforts they deserve that.


We lost on Tuesday because of poor defending and because the midfield simply did not put the graft in that is needed in this league. My team Coyne,Hoyte Riggott Pogi Bennett O'Neill Digard Osbourne or Williams Yeates Lita Kitson.


The name of the game is stay solid ,do not concede the first goal and us our attacking options Johnson and /or Emnes in the last half hour when the game is stretched to try to win it.


Could any of those who played on Tuesday and who have been excluded from the above line up have any complaints?I think not.

chris said:

Whats the bet the opposition on sunday play 4-5-1 ....they know we can't play against it....everytime we try we get stuffed but of course we continue with our 4-4-2....and hope....

Croydon Boro said:

Hey AV,


I fear you may be needing the Jedward after all. Forward me your email and I'll get it back to you. Have tried the email function on your profile page but can't attach it there.


About to book my Scunthorpe tickets. Back to Boro for four days and that's the best way I can think of spending my holiday? Give me strength.


Come on Boro etc etc


**AV writes: You can pillory me at: anthony.vickers@gazettemedia.co.uk

halifaxp said:

I really hope he makes swingeing cuts, Stockton Red, for the reasons you give, and I agree that Lita and Kitson have worked hard at QPR and Peterborough.

The reason I went with the young lads was that Kitson will probably choose Fulham over us in January and we need to build for the future and, without Kitson, Lita has looked pretty toothless. But I think we are in broad agreement on the message that needs to be sent out.


The Red Army has no place for cowards!

John Powls said:

Interesting suggestions for the team on Sunday.


I struggle to see how Hoyte is going to help defensively. McMahon's a better defender and scrapper, if you're going to leave Rhys Williams out. As many have said, the key is to be solid at the back and in the holding midfield area.


In the Cardiffs case, whether they go 4-4-2 or 4-5-1, there is a job to do in combatting their two midfielders that do most of the damage - Whittingham and Burke. Stop them playing and deny them the space in the centre of the park and you're half way there.


For me that mitigates for a 4-3-3/4-5-1 for Boro (or even a 3-5-2 as I've talked about previously, if you want to hold on to Kitson and Lita as a two up front).
Either way, I think that the centre of midfield is going to need three rather than two to start. You could revert to a 4-4-2 when the battle for control is sorted, if needed.


Assuming GON is fit I'd go for him and Arca either side of either Osbourne or Digard. This is the only starting role that I see for the Land Crab - bench only, otherwise.


My fear - and expectation - is, though, that 4-4-2 is going to be the way it is and, as a result, we get overwhelmed and outnumbered as a result.

Neil (Yarm) said:

I (almost) predicted this result after the 'lord mayors show' at QPR, and I wasn't a bit surprised to learn we'd lost at home again.


I tend to agree with a lot of what Mr Holloway had to say. I do believe that there are some factions of our fanbase who believed we would be too good for this league, and maybe there are some players who also thought the same thing.


Certainly the only thing that is consistent between GS1 and GS2 is the fact that apart from Kitson and Bent, they have the same players to pick from and the same back room staff running the show. The tactics to me at least haven't changed, it's just more tinkering with the same bunch of players and in reality we are no further forward. There are those amongst us who might argue we may have kept Southgate for what Strachan has achieved up to now.


So surely at least one of the constants has to change, and first of all it has to be the home tactics (if we accept that the away tactics are working). If we are getting overun or outworked by 5 man midfields, do it the McClaren way, match them up.


It might bore us to death, and no-one likes to see 4-5-1 at home but this is about not losing and gaining points, not being pretty (and we are not even that at home at the moment).


In defence, drop both Wheater and St Ledger (we should kiss goodbye to the 500K downpayment and welch on the deal with PNE), get Pogi and Riggot back in the centre, Hoyte at right back and Bennett or Grounds on the left.


In the middle get rid of Arca, and give Emnes the right sided slot, GON, Williams & and Digard in the middle and Johnson or Yeates on the left. Kitson or Lita up front supported by runs from midfield by GON and Emnes.

Nigel 'Reevalinho' Reeve said:

I agree with Johninho Powlista, the key to the team regaining confidence is good solid defending, with no daft goals conceded, the rest follows from there.


I'd be happy to see Pogginho at centre back but there are no obvious candidates screaming play me at left back are there?


Still being the eternal optimist that I am and assuming 'typical Boro' applies I fully expect Boro to beat Cardiff come Sunday.

halifaxp said:

Yes, Nigel, there is an obvious candidate for left back: the exciting, adventurous Bennett, who can also tackle as well as anyone. He makes occasional mistakes, but he has to have a chance to learn and he looks like a really good quality player.


I'd love to see him linking up with Yeates - or Johnson perhaps (if AJ plays, he must play left wing): that could put a bit of real pressure - the kind that home teams should exert - on the opposition's 5-man midfield.

Jarkko said:

'Reevalinho', that's logical that Boro now beat Cardiff! Or illogical untypical Boro?


Up the Boro!

redcartim said:

I'm with halifaxp, the team should be gutted from Tuesday night for the Cardiff game. If the same team is picked with a few tweaks it will be disgraceful.


I do not agree with GS2 stating that the players need a chance to redeem themselves - they have been trying all season to do that and they haven't done it. Drop the lot of them and play a completely different team. Arrogance counselling needs to be given to all senior members of the club, coaching and playing staff.


I'm not going to even watch the match on TV on Sunday, I'm still too embarrassed by Tuesday night.

gt said:

Get them out of cushy Rockcliffe and back training on Redcar beach. The fact is I think its obvious theres a culture of losers at the club, and unless you can ship about 15 players out and replace them theres gonna be alot of tears between now and next summer

Nigel 'Reevalinho' Reeve said:

halifaxp - I haven't seen Bennett play, but given our current predicament if he's a contender then there has to be a strong case for making a change.


Wheater may simply need a break, St. Ledger probably just needs some time to learn a little discipline but there is no time left now to be learning on the job.
I can see in the not to distant future a centre back pairing of Poggi and Riggot.
Wheater and St. Ledger will be back though, they're both decent players.

John Powls said:

In a 4-3-3 you could play Joe Bennett at left back and, since the midfield three will be narrow he can push up when Boro are going forward.


If Johnno is on the left of the front three, he can drop back in to midfield to make a five when Cardiff have the ball.


If Emnes then played on the right of the front three we could at last see him in the role he played (and still plays at U21 international) in Holland - an attacker rather than a striker as Strachan called him.


For him, it would then be 'put up or shut up, show us what you can do in the position that led to all those glowing reports that attracted us to buy you in the first place'.


Kitson down the middle. But with Lita on the bench, if either Emnes or 4-3-3 isn't working you can pull him/it and go back to 4-4-2.


At the back - Coyne in goal and Wheats alonsgide Pogi in the centre with Riggs on the bench. Ledge has to go back to Preston after Sunday anyway so we may as well try it without him - and put a flicker of uncertainty into his thinking too.


Showing a variety of approach instead of just the standard 4-4-2 and making it work in a televised game would, at least, put some doubt into the minds of coaches visiting The Riverside who now find Boro predictable and easy to read, counteract and then overcome.


If it doesn't come off, well, we're no worse off than we are now.

gt said:

On the Redcar beach thing ,some of the players are that thick, Theyd probably pack their Sun Tan lotion

Si said:

Additionally:

"GS1 had the victory over Liverpool..."

Different kind of performance, halifaxp. Pool were all over us for long periods and it took a fortunate own goal to put us in front.

And what if Torres had been fit?

Richard said:

Mythbuster: Earlier in this thread, you said,


"This is still basically Southgate's team,....."


I’m compelled to point out that this is a conveniently-constructed half-truth by those focused on the smaller picture. And you do yourself no credit and belie your nom-de-plume by perpetuating it.


This is GIBSON'S team - as well as his club! It was "built" (some would say "demolished") on residual money after clawing back whatever he could in debt reduction and thereby setting the parameters within which Southgate and any successive manager had and will have to work.


He continues to do so with Strachan, although this hasn't been put to the big test, quite yet. But when any additional serious monies are made available, Gibson WILL be exposed, if he hasn't been already in many people's eyes, as the principal architect of Boro's slide into Championship obscurity.


In all the discussions about who's off the boil and who's out of position and who's too slow and...and...and..., when will anyone acknowledge the big picture and finally accept that without investment in genuine better quality playing staff in several (now, many) key areas, Boro are a very ordinary and inconsistent Championship side and maybe even not too far removed from being a possible relegation-battle Championship side?


Poor performance has little to do with fans. It's got everything to do with the team - their quality, experience and character. And these days, if you want them to be good, you generally have to pay for them!


If Gibson doesn't have that money or access to those lines of credit any more, that's not any manager's fault. And besides, whoever he is, the manager is also a Steve Gibson appointment!


The only way for Boro to differentiate from the bulk of the dross in the Championship is to spend more money on more and better players to a) get better competencies in place and b) strengthen the squad to sustain consistency.


Fan's reaction is generally that, REACTION. Not pro-action. Any pro-action from fans is generally positive until it is undermined by unacceptable performance on the pitch. Otherwise, why keep going to matches? You surely don't go to a football match hoping to watch your team get beat?


(Actually, on second thoughts, I think there ARE a number of people who "enjoy poor health" and perversely, enjoy being able to routinely shout negative abuse. I think, there will always be a faction with that sort of mentality around. Maybe Middlesbrough suffers from a higher percentage in the population than most?)


To think that the academy can be the source of the backbone of a team to challenge week in, week out in a Premier League, is naivety. Hansen said it years ago, and although it irks me to acknowledge it because of his smugness, he was right. That has been a part of Gibson's miscalculation over the past four years.


It's not that the academy isn't a great thing - it probably is - but it's far from being enough upon which to build the backbone of a top flight professional football team these days - because the game is global – as Gibson knew only too well when he brought in the likes of Juninho and Ravanelli and a host of other non-Brits to be able to compete in the Premier League.


Unless Gibson again splashes more cash to support what his publicly-stated ambition was in May - promotion at the first attempt - he'll fail. And it'll be interpreted that he'll have been seen to have deliberately misled the football-supporting public of Teesside (outside of Stockton, of course).


Increasingly, people are having to accept the growing mountain of evidence that Boro will not be seriously challenging for promotion to the Premier League. They are having to learn to accept Boro's new equilibrium position as, at best, a Championship side.


Incidentally, I believe Steve Gibson and Keith Lamb, deep down, genuinely have already accepted that as the case, because they KNOW what it takes to survive in the Premier League. And it appears that the Gibson empire can’t sustain it any more.


Oh yes, they, like all other supporters, will have HOPE that some alchemist's solution will miraculously be found by Wizard Stachan to justify their strategy. But the reality surely must be that they already know what the likely fate of MFC is? They're just not saying so, and allowing the gullible public to find out the hard way.


At least, that's how it appears to me! And has done for about two years, which was when it first really dawned on me!

Ian Wood said:

Why does Arca get a game and on the right? Unbelieveable. Pogi is not a left back we have proved that so why is he being played there?

halifaxp said:

Yes, OK, Si, it was a fortunate first goal against Liverpool - but a lot of goals contain an element of luck, like Lita's open play goal at QPR.


There were also many similarities - mostly a really committed performance all through the team (Bates typefying that in midfield), strong front-running from Aliadiere (yes, truly!) and a crowd which was fully behind the team from start to finish. My point was that both managers seem to have had the team playing for them with coherence, belief and passion on occasions (too few occasions!)

Chris from Beverley said:

Well we all seem to have become Bloggers cum Managers overnight. Perhaps the thought of Strachan going into his Bob Marley redemption mode has sparked off a new craze of lets all pick a team for Sunday !


I have to agree with my old mate Halifax Pete that I would have Bennett in at left back anytime. Perhaps, a new thought of moving Johnson inside (ala-Downing a few seasons ago) and let him run riot in the middle, with Yeates on the left and Emnes on the right. That would create mayhem in the Cardiff defence.


As for the Arrogance counselling, I think we could all do with a little bit of that occasionally.


Kev B, you might have a lot more Company in the Nav on Sunday than you bargained for! ...

stockton red said:

Richard I read your post with interest and of course in some respects it is near to the mark[regarding Steve Gibson].


At the end of the day if your club is in the Championship or lower then you have a choice and that is to enjoy football for what it is and support your team or leave it alone.


However it does not alter the fact that on Tuesday we were outfought, outthought and outplayed by a decent Blackpool team. Now they have poor crowds by this division's standards and have never had Premier League T.V. money.They have been in the lower leagues for years.


What do you think their top earner gets? My guess is 5 or 6 grand a week tops.Their wage bill will be a fraction of ours. It didnt stop their players busting a gut,closing down, moving off the ball to give a team mate an option and committed tackling - everything that was missing from our lot and that is what most fans cannot stomach.

Mythbuster said:

Richard said:


"I’m compelled to point out that this is a conveniently-constructed half-truth by those focused on the smaller picture. And you do yourself no credit and belie your nom-de-plume by perpetuating it."


Are you also compelled to be so pompous?


From my seat, your "bigger picture" is just your own blinkered world view.


In any case, I was not making any point about Southgate. I was stating that almost all the current squad were brought into the first team by Southgate. He either bought them, borrowed them, or selected them from the Academy. That is a truth, not a half-truth.


And I don't think they're all fundamentally bad players. The problem is that they're continuing to show exactly the same failings that they did under Southgate. Another truth, not a half-truth.


You can blame who you like for that, Gibson, Lamb, Southgate, Strachan, Santa Claus or the Pope. I don't really care, as long as the problem gets solved.

Andy R said:

I would try to keep things as simple as possible against Cardiff. A back-to-basics approach of as solid a spine as we can muster, attacking down the flanks and getting crosses into the box.


I would therefore stick with a 442 formation, but change the personnel. Pogatetz and Riggott would be my centre-half pairing. They are solid defenders who defend and little else.


I would put Digard and Williams/Osbourne in front of them as added protection. Two tackling midfielders who can win the ball back, help the defence and play simple balls out wide.


Attacking down the flanks, I would play our two most attacking full backs, which look to me to be Hoyte and Bennett. They can overlap and support the wide men, who'd be Yeates/Johnson and O'Neil.


Kitson and Lita up front.


Simples.

Nigel Reeve said:

Richard - I have to say I find your transformation from a positive optimistic sort of guy you used to be to the bitter guy you appear to be now astounding.


Okay so Gibbo is short of a little dosh at present. Thats hardly a good reason to hit him with a stick is it? What he has given us in the last twenty years would have been beyond my wildest dreams before it happened.


Did you not support Boro pre 1986, don't you remember what sort of club it was then?

Forever Dormo said:

Mythbuster - a little harsh blaming Santa Claus for all this trouble. Tradition has it that he "has it in" for the Boro, but not for a couple of weeks yet.


Mind you, if Christmas and January are as bad as it has been in the last month or so, we are in for a rocky ride.

Kev B said:

Ok, I'm over it now. It's only a game and people on Teesside are losing their jobs which really is something to get upset about. So I will be in the Nav (at 11am!) and then make the short walk to The Riverside to watch the latest episode unfold.


I like some of the ideas floated on team picking. Chris from Beverley- moving Johnson in the middle, with Yeates on the left and Emnes on the right seems quite exciting and we have nothing to lose do we after Saturday!


Going back to last blog article - maybe this week was the time to give away tickets for free - would be so much better than an expanse of red seats for the couch potatoes to see.

Chris Marton said:

"Nigel Reeve said:
Did you not support Boro pre 1986, don't you remember what sort of club it was then?"

Err, sorry, but pretty much just as it is now, me thinks.

Gutted!! said:

Richard - What you have written is very sad yet very true!


I keep going on to youtube to watch games from '88 when the Holgate was bouncing and the more recent years when the Riverside even had a good atmosphere especially on cup nights.


The thing that really annoys me is this isn't a good league, they're a lot of games to get through but the quality of the opposition isn't good the lower half of Premier league isn't good that's why we hung on in there for so long last season. I just find it hard to accept that we/Boro are even worse.


Sad and Gutted.

Neil (Yarm) said:

I'm afraid I have to agree with Richard. It finally dawned on me too at the end of last season, after three years of seeing my club being dismantled before my eyes, that my Boro, who I have supported for 50 years will never again reach the heights that culminated in reaching the Uefa Cup Final.


As my son said recently "Eindhoven to London Road in 3 years, what's going on dad?". Well I think most of us know the answer to that, it's really all about money, or rather the lack of it and the inability of Steve Gibson to sustain bankrolling a club that has been punching above it's weight for years.


I'm not going to slag off SG here, it's all been said before, other than to say I do believe he has hoodwinked a lot of people, including Gareth Southgate, possibly Gordon Strachan and more so the loyal fans.


I've certainly enjoyed the last "12 years of humiliation" and please sir could I have some more, but we need to be realistic.


We are now a middle of the road Championship team that is in danger of sinking without trace, and anyone who thinks we won't or can't do a Leeds, Norwich, Southampton or Charltion really need to wake up and smell the proverbial coffee.


On a personal level, I see a lot of parallels with the seasons under Charlie Amer and the Jackie Charlton and John Neal eras. Those of you with long memories like me I'm sure don't need to be reminded of what followed after Charlie decided to pull the plug; those of you of a younger vintage might wish to look back in history, talk to your dad's and granddad's. History has a strange way of repeating itself.

Werdermouth said:

It seems this season is turning into one of attrition where even the most optimistic are gradually getting worn down by the inept performances.


On the whole the impatient anger of the fans stems from the failure to deliver the promises that were spun from the very top - perhaps more in hope than with any resource backed expectation of them being achieved.


After Boro initially flattered to deceive after playing teams mainly now languishing at the foot of the table - there now appears to be little difference in the standard of performances in the six games that lead up to Southgates sacking and the six games without him to blame for poor decision-making.


Last six games of Southgate:
7 Pts - Goals: F 6 - A 9


Next six games post Southgate:
6 Pts - Goals: F 10 - A 11


You could argue that if Gareth had been allowed three loan signings - and especially had Kitson - he would have fared even better.


But the reality is that performances in the short to medium term - and that afterall was the period over which Southgate was judged this season - have not really changed despite having a more experienced man making the decisions.


I would therefore conclude, that despite the need to give GS2 time to make a full impact, the problems at the Boro run a lot deeper than simply who is in charge.


It now looks like we were badly prepared for a promotion campaign in the Championship with the priority being securing the financial future of the club rather than getting the right players for the job.


If that had been communicated properly at the start of the season rather than pretending promotion was the priority then it probably would have been better for all concerned.


So I think we should now draw a line under this season and accept it's going to require a major rebuilding of the team before we can contemplate promotion.


OK there is always a chance that we'll be able to keep in touch of the playoffs but our expectations need to be somewhat tempered. This may at least take away some pressure from the players who on the whole don't seem to be able to cope with it and give Strachan some slack to make the right decisions.

scoredraw said:

We are very soft down the centre of defence which when you consider we have Riggot & Pogatetz in our squad is puzzling.


The full backs like to stand off.


Did the team have their christmas party on Monday ?


SOLUTION:

Rest St Ledger & Wheater, Jones and reintroduce the criminally underrated McMahon. There you go, this management game is easy.


The trick is to understand the answers are on the pitch and in the squad and definitely not in the stands whether that be the Riverside or the Holgate End.

halifaxp said:

Kev B: good man! We need stability at these worrying times, including those of us who go to the matches through routine rather than any great hope of reward. Enjoy the Navi, at least!


I suspect Chris's idea is a bit too adventurous for GS2, but it's worth thinking about, isn't it? And your idea of free tickets is great: probably too soon to implement it, as the Club has probably only known that the game was on telly since about... er... August, and only known that attendance were a problem since about GS1's dismissal, but can 1700 of the problematic half-season cards (which won't I suspect be flying off the shelves) be given out to Corus workers? That might rescue a portion of the PR foot-shrapnel!

Mythbuster said:

Forever Dormo wrote:


“Mythbuster - a little harsh blaming Santa Claus for all this trouble.”


No apologies. I just don’t trust the man. He came to the match dressed all in red and white, posing as a Boro supporter. Next thing, he’s talking Wheater and St Ledger into handing out early Christmas presents to people dressed in orange.


He did the same with Scrooge. A miserly defender until he fell under this guy’s influence.


The Pope, on the other hand, could be a useful addition to our squad. A left-footer who spends most of his time on the right wing. He’d fit in perfectly.


**AV writes: There's no way of transubstantiating that.

Grove Hill wallah said:

AV. What is this blog's view of appeals? Can they be deemed "frivolous"?.


The grounds for my appeal are in two parts.

Dormo (by his own admission) was clearly under the influence of alcohol and allowed it to cloud his judgement.


Not allowing, what was clearly a "100 comment" would be akin to chalking off Geoff Hurst's goal in the '66 Wworld Cup final, thereby denying him possibly, the most famous hat trick in football history!


My Azerbajani Lawyer; Mr Tofik Bakhramov (who has experience in these cases. and who would also like to point out he is not Russian) has said he is convinced my appeal should be accepted.


I have carefully copied these points onto the back of a twenty pound note and mailed them to you; c\o Gazette Towers.


I also fully expect typical Boro to beat Cardiff on Sunday.


**AV writes: I eagerly await the arrival of what sounds a compelling legal argument.


sick as a parott said:

At the moment we are 11 points from a relegation spot and 2 points from a play off spot, so things might not be as bad as there seem.


The worrying thing is that the team do not seem to be improving under Strachan.


On to Sunday my changes would be to drop St Ledger (he is going to be missing soon) and play Pogi at CB and Bennett at LB.


I would play Osbourne and Digard in CM with O'Neill on the right and Yates on the left of midfield.


C'Mon Boro

Anlov said:

Its hard to believe all the posts here trashing the quality of the players. It has been obvious from before this season that the squad is more than good enough to push for a top spot in this league. This is still true, and I reckon most of us know that when we take a deep breath and look at the squad.


Were not doing ourselves or the club any favours by constructing false arguments about the players. It only serves to hide facts.


Strachan will, I hope, get it right sooner rather than later... Despite missing Southgate and his teams obvious progression one point from the top,lets remember the patience he was shown last year, when he actually did some obvious mistakes. And no, Im not thinking of transfers.


The fans have always blamed him for certain sales, but we all know he had no choice. We all remember strange substitutes, strange line ups and strange faith in certain goalkeepers. Such errors cost points and might have cost us the PL status.


But that patience shown gave Boro the only pride we had last season, along with Southgates (and the clubs) massive use of own bred youngsters. This patience can prove important for Strachan, as he obviously cant manage the team he inherited.


Boros respect around the country was partly based on that patience and that we had a rare breed in a patient and strong Gibson. The disappointment was this great when he didd the massive error of judgement in sacking Southgate at a horribly wrong time, in a horribly wrong way. The comments in major papers was interesting read. Our esteem fell from "very igh" to "low" in a strange aftermath in the evening of the trashing of Derby at Riverside.


One forgotten point is the disbelief among the players when their boss was sacked in the most absurd of times and manners. To a young lad lad such things can hurt morale and motivation. Because it is not only true that Southgate bought a lot of these players, he also nurtured a lot of them from the juniors and into top premier league life.


It might take some skill and some time for Strachan to replace the vacuum created after Southgates departure. But lets hope Gibson reinvent his belief in patience and trust, and give Strachan the time needed to get his message (whatever it is) through.

Nigel Reeve said:

Neil (Yarm) - You cannot seriously compare Steve Gibson to Charlie Amer, come on be reasonable!!

CHRIS said:

I have read we have not lernt our lessons.....Grounds to Huddersfield for £750,000 ...another piece of good business or a give away?

braveheart1 said:

From todays 'daily record '


Tony Mowbray was today warned that captain Gary Caldwell could quit Celtic for his former club Middlesbrough for nothing unless he gets him tied up on a new deal in the next fortnight.


Scotland international defender Caldwell is out of contract at the end of the season, but has admitted he is keen to play on with the Parkhead club.


However, the Hoops skipper, who was named SPFA Player of the Year last season, is free to talk to other interested clubs from next month and there are several potential suitors for his signature.


Barclays Premier League new boys Burnley, where his brother Steven plays, have been repeatedly linked with a move for the former Hibs and Newcastle United player in recent weeks.


As have Coca-Cola Championship club Middlesbrough where Gordon Strachan, who took Caldwell to Celtic from Hibs for nothing on a Bosman deal back in 2006, is now in charge.


Strachan, who quit Celtic in the summer after failing to win a fourth consecutive Scottish title, is enduring a torrid start to his reign at the Riverside Stadium.


His side has only won one of the six games they have played since he succeeded Gareth Southgate as Boro gaffer – a 5-1 win over QPR last weekend – this season and the supporters at the Teesside club are growing increasingly restless.


A 3-0 defeat to Blackpool at home, where former Rangers star Charlie Adam was among the scorers, has caused many of them to question whether the Scot is the right man to take them back into the top flight.


The pressure the 52-year-old is now feeling could increase his chances of returning to his old club to plunder their out-of-contract players – with Caldwell top of the shopping list – during the January transfer window.

Scoredraw said:

I think Gordon Strachan is doing a good job. He is finding out where the weaknesses are. As anyone involved in football knows you make your initial assessment on players on the training ground in the weekday sessions but are only able to make a genuine judgement after seeing the players perform for real, in important matches.


It's only after a 'lengthy' period that you can then understand that the 'superfit, lean, confident, chirpy, perfect trainer' might not be good at making decisions on a Saturday afternoon. He needs to do what Cappello has done for England - get the right balance between relaxed and concentration.


Jesus, Mary and Joseph the Boro team MUST know they are much better than that Blackpool team !!!

Gordon's recent response of "I don't know" to a set of post match questions is perfectly acceptable. At present he doesn't know why a team that played so well on Saturday looked like a bunch of wimps on Tuesday.


His comment on the crowd was perfect. The players and management should not look to blame the crowd for their , lack of concentration, weakness in the tackle and mental fear.


The people of the Boro are far too soft. They are very patient and long suffering - for God's sake we have tolerated Stewart Bell as an MP for over 25 years !!!!!!!

Scoredraw said:

Having just watched the Blackpool goals on BBC. Someone needs to stick up for Wheater. The lad is too straight for his own good. He's trying to cover too much ground/area and he then looks like he is the one responsible for the mistakes


St Ledger was appalling in his attempts to tackle and get into position. These things happen and it has to be viewed in perspective but it is important that David Wheater doesn't shoulder the blame for everyone else's mistakes. There is an unpleasant tendency to blame the young and vulnerable in these circumstances.

Redcar Red said:

The first 15 minutes on Sunday may well define the clubs future. Nervous, twitchy defending, square pegs allied to a midfield over run with no service to the front two (as in "Typical Boro" style) will get the Bedwetters howling derision from the off.


On the otherhand a determined, confident, ruthless display allied to some swashbuckling attacking movements with a few crunching challenges for good measure will up the tempo and have the fans onside (sadly that will be the Cardiff team). I don't see anything from GSII to make me think he can fire his team up, in fact I will go further and say that apart from his Press Room clashes (which are very self indulgent at best) he appears to be even nicer than GSI on the touchline.


I predict a crowd of 14,700 with desperate attempts of Tannoy induced soundblocking the renditions of "Sold down the River" echoing around the Stadium as Cardiff go into a 2 goal lead in the first 20 minutes.


Being short of a bob or two in tough times is not a problem on Teesside and we are well used to it, just a shame that SG didn't hold his hand up earlier instead of trying spin and hoping we were all gullible (except Stocktonians).


The response from the Teesside public towards him would have been a lot more supportive than it is now and collectively we would now be in a far better place and the "goodwill blank cheques" wouldn't have bounced.


A lot of Lads and Lasses at the ground on Sunday don't know where they will be living next Christmas or if Santa will even come or not. Indeed for many Santa will have a massive struggle this year. Come the end of this season a lot of them literally don't know if they will be able to provide a roof over their childrens heads. From that perspective a gutless, spineless and disinterested display will be met with a fans response that even Ian Holloway couldn't possibly imagine.


Put simply the Teesside public have had to deal with a lot this last year and patience has worn very thin. If we see 11 individuals who are "out of sorts" or "not commited" then don't expect the "Foamees" to win the day!


COME ON BORO!

John Gibson said:

Wedermouth 8.50 am

Well said.

John Aus

Jarkko said:

Was the only reason why we beat QPR that the lads really wanted to get your hair cut done, AV? I have yet to see you looking like a Beatles' singer but it must have been scaring.


Perhaps the fear factor worked? But again this works only for once. So something new must be found. Uncle Eric? Up the Boro!

Richard said:

Nigel Reeve:


Nigel, would my apparent personal transformation be as astounding as Boro's, perhaps?


Don't bother to answer, Nigel. The question was as rhetorical as Steve Gibson's "Blind Faith" promise!


Solved the conundrum yet?

Richard said:

Redcar Red:


"Being short of a bob or two in tough times is not a problem on Teesside and we are well used to it, just a shame that SG didn't hold his hand up earlier instead of trying spin and hoping we were all gullible (except Stocktonians).


The response from the Teesside public towards him would have been a lot more supportive than it is now and collectively we would now be in a far better place and the "goodwill blank cheques" wouldn't have bounced."


You are right on the button with these two paragraphs, Red.


It's what I've been saying for months and months. A bit of nowse (nouse? nous?) in the PR department would have gone a long way to preserving the "relationship" that (Sir) Steve Gibson had built up across Teesside over the past 23 years.


Instead, he chose to reconstruct by stealth, instead of explaining how things were (regretably) going to have to change and ask the supporters to bear with him as he embarked on the next (necessary) phase of "Project Boro" which would involve stabilising the club's finances after getting hit by a much bigger economic downturn than anyone expected and reconstructing from there.


It would have been a lot easier to accept the draw on finances (lines of credit and maybe internal revenues as the money had to be found up front) for the Rockcliffe Park development, if it had been presented to supporters in that manner.


THAT conciliatory and inclusive approach is how it ought to have been done. Instead of pretending for far too long that he was able to deliver something he clearly was no longer able to do.


It was Luke Young's departure that finally did it for me. That's when the penny dropped! And though I didn't WANT to believe it, the growing evidence as last season progressed, made the facts undeniable.


Finally, there was a begrudged admission far too late, that we had some financial constraints and it wasn't until the theme developed in the public domain and the circumstantial evidence became indisputable, that a few confirmatory comments came out from various sources.


I'm afraid Gibson's public persona has taken a massive knock that could have been so easily avoided by a degree more professionalism in the PR management at the club. He's shown, through treating his customers and fellow Boro supporters like mushrooms, and through the sacking of Gareth Southgate in the manner in which he did, the characteristics of the public perception of a stereotypical back street second-hand car salesman. (Would YOU buy a car from him?)


As far as I'm concerned, the halo's slipped, the trust is gone and the partnership's dissolved.


I'm no more than a potential customer now. Not a partner. I started divorce proceedings at the end of last season with the non-renewal of vows and with the Blackpool result on Tuesday, the decree nisi has just been granted!

scoredraw said:

So the government has lost Mr Gibson's vote forever. Interesting....


I imagine his financial position is such that he would benefit greatly from a change of government. I'm not certain the rest of Teesside would be rewarded in the same way.


Well at least he's speaking again I was beginning to think we had sold him.

halifaxp said:

"Nous", I think, Richard, though AV likes "nouse" a lot!

Nigel Reeve said:

Richard I'm not so good at conundrum solving! I'm not having a pop at you, I'm curious more than anything.


Just following on from your 5:11pm post, what/who are you divorcing yourself from?
If its support for Steve Gibson, I can see that, although I think you over simplify what has happened thus making it easy to blame him for events.


But surely you cant divorce yourself from Boro, that simply isn't possible surely?

Richard said:

Nigel, I realise it's the pantomime season, so in keeping with the spirit of it, "Oh, yes I can!"


Sunday's match against Cardiff City will be the first match, since I started following Boro, that I will voluntarily NOT be attending. Nor will I be watching on TV. Nor will I be listening on radio.


An ex work colleague of mine who had followed Boro for many years, man and boy, before I ever did, gave up his season ticket some time before I did and stopped regularly attending at the Riverside. When I asked him why, he said, "Because it's too painful".


Until recently, I didn't fully understand what he meant. I do now. So I'm protecting myself and withdrawing, because I absolutely HATE what's happened to the Boro - the club that gave me the best footballing spectating experiences of my life. So soon after that, they're now, consistently, giving me the worst.


Frankly, there's so little to look forward to any more, but an unacceptable level of frustration, pain and poor value for money.


As I said in blogs last year, I intended, and I have been prepared to wait for hard evidence of Gibson's declared intent becoming reality. It hasn't materialised. So I'm now initiating the next phase of my own personal withdrawal. It's the least painful option.


I'd initially been prepared to give him 12-14 matches in the Championship to demonstrate serious intent and provide hard evidence of the ambition and resolve he claimed. He's had 20.


My patience has run out and I'm sick of throwing good money after bad, waiting and waiting for the good stuff to happen as promised!


A while ago, I decided to seriously restrict the pieces I was writing for Boro Banter. I didn't wish to be seen to being a kill-joy or another Bernie Slaven, by building a reputation as a negativist. I didn't wish to undermine any good that may have been happening behind the scenes, but I genuinely, couldn't find anything positive to say that would add any value to what was being written by others.


So, for me, personally, the best course of action is to withdraw at this time.


I really wish Boro well and hope that sometime soon, someone will do something to restore the hope for the future that made me so enthusiastic for a good few years.

steve h said:

This squad is more than good enough to make the play-offs, whoever the manager is.

Grove Hill wallah said:

Here's a conundrum for you.

Which Boro team will turn up on Sunday?

Ian Gill said:

Nigel


My long held view was that Boro and MFC were different. The support for the former is absolute, support for the other is conditional on the health of the former and the governance of the latter.


AV


Beware of incoming as the 100 post mark arrives. One suspects that WerDormo Wallah are getting ready to inundate the board in their quest for pecuniary advantage.


I will, of course, continue contributing based on my Corinthian priciples. It is the taking part that counts. Anyone thinking I am posting at the 90 post point to gain an advantage is petty and small minded.


Presses submit with lofty disdain unconcerned at the 100 post mark.

Werdermouth said:

Scoredraw, I think Gibson is fair game when it come to footballing matters but I think he's always had a strong community spirit.


If personal wealth was his main agenda in life I'm sure there are safer investments than MFC - though if he's thinking of switching his allegiance to the blue team then he may get tackled by their new non-dom sweeper.


Still the Boro faithful might be interested to know that he seems to be now advocating against blind loyalty - apparently you don't always get what you were expecting.


I also read that he has invited 100 steel workers to the Riverside so that the fans can empathise with their misery (or was that the other way round?). Perhaps it might also galvanise the crowd into a general show of solidarity - more cynical fans might smell a cunning plan? Anyway, apparently the team will warm up whist wearing S.O.S. T-shirts - I think it stands for 'Strachan Or Southgate'.


So, I'm expecting a convincing victory this Sunday as I'm sure Strachan will have got everyone fired up and committed following the Blackpool no-show.

gt said:

It seems all the pundits are complaining about Strachan being a little prickly with them,I think he is frustrated with what he has inherited,and is finding it hard to answer honestly what he really wants to say about them,


He's got an unbalanced squad (more defenders than needed ) a squad that has very little character,have a losing mentality,and in many cases not good enough alot will end up in div 1 and 2 plying there trade,Im sure some of them already know theyre gone so get ready for a bumpy ride fans

Allan in Bahrain said:

A sneaky attempt at post no. ...


We shall be watching the match tomorrow, our first since Sheff Utd. I don't know whether that is a good thing or a bad thing but at least a live match!!!!


I think it will be a good match as Cardiff will probably attack from the word go. As we are the underdogs by now we may be able win it... typical Boro again.


Anyway time will tell.

Neil (Yarm) said:

Nigel Reeve:


Comparing Steve Gibson to Charlie Amer, hells bells no!!


I was simply using the point as an analogy, a parallel, a parody even.


When Charlie tightened his belt, Boro went from a promising side in the old Division 1 to almost going out of business in 1986 until Steve Gibson came on the scene.


For not too disimilar reasons Boro have gone from the Uefa Cup Final to a (currently) middle of the road Championship side in less than 4 years.


Who knows where next.

Neil (Yarm) said:

Scoredraw:

"Well at least he's speaking again I was beginning to think we had sold him."

Love it mate!

Jarkko said:

Sir Alex says: "Maybe he (Scholes) thinks he should be playing every game. That's fine, but I know that's not fair." Also PS will be offered a new one year deal at Old Trafford - but not regular football anymore.


Couldn't we go for a player like PS for Boro? We need steel and domination in midfield. To help and guide our kids. Up the Boro!


**AV writes: We asked in the summer. He wasn't interested. That's 100 by the way.

Forever Dormo said:

Since we have a Sunday game this week, do I take it the usual "pre-game rush to post" will officially begin tomorrow morning?


Incidentally the denizens of the Baited Bear, where the Cardiff game will be shown live on the big screen and where there are 4 real ales served with a friendly smile and in the warmth of a real fire, ignoring the Guinness and lagers, are trying to tempt the remaining ST holders to turn away from their true love.


Would it be the same without the journey in, the queue for pre-match commestibles, the banter and the disappointment we seem to have suffered in recent weeks at home, feeling cold and miserable in our seats for the game before having the "joy" of seeing the same few (and extremely boring) adverts on the concourse screens whilst waiting for what are euphemistically termed "highlights" at half time and at the end?


Would we miss the wait for the crowds to disperse so we can make our way out of the natural paradise that is Middlehaven, crossing the footbridge and then groping our way in darkness to find our transport home? The siren voices are calling us away from our love.


Richard has his Decree Nisi. It's not that bad for me yet. But if I find my love in bed with another man, maybe this time wearing a Cardiff shirt, it might be time to reconsider the long term future of this relationship. And if worst fears are met, and she THEN goes on to make eyes at our northern neighbours.....NO the consequences are too horrible to think about.

Ernie Oglesby said:

Did Digard last ten minutes against Blackpool? Now he's 'injured' again and out for two to three weeks. He's spent more time on the treatment table than on the pitch since signing for Boro. The frog's legs are obviously not up to life in the English game.


Get shot, ASAP!

Forever Dormo said:

....and this is to give official notice of my intention to retire to the bar whilst the "100th Blog frenzy" (on this thread) rages on around us.


However, and before I do, I should refer to GHW's post at 9.55am yesterday. I realise there are those amongst us who are prepared to resort not only to threats of legal action to wrest the prize away from its proper recipients. But to resort to the paranormal!


I will say this only once (so listen carefully).


1. The extra bottle of Rioja was taken only to put the Sporting Issues & Dubious Goals Panel, to use its full title, into the same condition it appeared the players were in at the last home match. It makes it easier to judge the players' intentions and likely consequences of their actions. The proprieties were observed at all times. Only moderate quantities of tapas were taken so as not to interfere with critical judgement.


2. The £20 note submitted is an insult to the integrity of the Panel and, although it has been cashed in (simply in order to verify its validity as a banknote, and to ensure this was a genuine attempt to subvert the disciplinary process) the result is an automatic refusal of the appeal. Justice is very difficult to value. But on any consideration of the issues, at least another three noughts would be required to justify more detailed analysis of the incident. Sadly, GHW, your opportunity has now gone.


3. The Panel was much moved by the novel attempt to engage assistance from Tofik Bakhramov, the so called "Baku Whistler" in the appeals process. However since he departed these sporting fields in 1996, and since the use of Ouija Boards has been specifically outlawed in handling appeals, then again I must inform that your argument has no foundation.

You will recall the Oiuja Ban following on from an unsuccessful appeal brought by the followers of Phidippides who sought to have a posthumous Gold Medal awarded to the original Marathon runner, and in which case it was claimed his drink had been "spiked" by jealous Spartans or Persians - the sources differ as to the guilty party.


The Panel was able to agree the athlete had shown courage and endurance in running in excess of 140 miles to Sparta in an unsuccessful attempt to engage Spartan support for the Athenian army facing the might of the Persian Empire, and then having to run all the way back with the sad news that they couldn't join in as it was a "religious holiday", then having to take part in the victorious battle, and THEN having to run the 26 miles back to Athens to relay news from the field.
It was claimed the drink had been spiked, causing the athlete to expire shortly after delivering his message to the Athenians.


However it was far from clear to the Panel whether any extraneous substance introduced into his drinking bag by the Spartans/Persians was an intended poison to cause his death, or whether it was, in fact, a performance enhancing drug taken by the athlete himself (despite knowing its illegality) in order that he could complete feats of such extraordinary endurance.


Since the event occurred in 546BC, and in the absence of other live witnesses, the supporters of Phidippides sought to introduce testimony from the athlete himself via Ouija technology.


In a definitive Judgement given by the Chairman of the Panel, Lord Dorman of Long (as he then was), declared: “Evidence, unless agreed, must be given live, by witnesses who are available for cross-examination by those who may wish to challenge the testimony, and in a manner that allows the Panel to have sight of them in order to judge the demeanour of the witnesses, so that their veracity might be properly weighed in the decision-making process.”

The Judgment quoted above was specifically quoted with approval by the then President of the Supreme Panel of Adjudication, Viscount Rabbit of Warrenby in the notorious Shergar appeal in 1987 - 4 years after the horse went missing, presumed dead. It remains good law.


In short GHW, close, but no Balkan Sobranie. Appeal Dismissed. No order for costs against the appellant on this occasion, nor any additional penalty imposed, as the matter was entertainingly argued and it was felt important to have a recent authority on this frequently troubled area of dispute.


However notice is given for the future that frivolous appeals will not be entertained and might be the subject of additional sanction, at the discretion of the Panel in the exercise of its appellate function. Permission has been given for a transcript of this Judgement to be made available at public expense so that the wider public might be made aware of the decision.


**AV writes: The full 126 page transcipt of the judgement can be seen at toomuchtimeonhis hands@dubiousgoals.con

Denis said:

Richard has done us all a service by ariculating very clearly and systematically the duplicity demonstrated by Steve Gibson over the last two years.


He has cleverly maintained a front of private benefactor and revelled in the title of 'best chairman in football'. On closer scrutiny his knowledge, judgement and experience of football matters is no better than the ordinary fan.


He has ruined the club through poor decision making,dithering and appointing not an aspiring manager but a lackey in Southgate.


I have lost confidence and trust in him as a chairman and I certainly feel duped into buying a season ticket this year.It won't happen twice.


There seems to be a paucity of honesty and clarity of where this club is going as there are goals at the Riverside.

Grove Hill wallah said:

Looking at the results in the Championship today, it would appear nobody could possibly predict how this season is going to turn out.


If the Boro can manage to string a few good results together, starting tomorrow who knows what they could achieve.

Jarkko said:

AV, I will have difficulties with the Mercedes offered for the 100th post. You see we have a very heavy tax on new cars here in Finland - and the tax is C02 based too. So can I change that big V8 engined car to something smaller - a diesel engined Opel (or Vauxhal in the UK) will do. We are in the Championship, anyway.


Now I need to ask my wife when I can come over to collect the car. I dear not ask you to deliver it all the 1000 miles North East from the North East. (Also I could see a Bore match live during the same trip.) Thanks, AV!


Up the Boro!

Jarkko said:

**AV writes: We asked in the summer. He wasn't interested. That's 100 by the way.


Yes, but now the question will be asked by GS2! If not Scholes perhaps somebody of similar calibre.


PS. I prefer a Boro red car (not Redcar).

Ian Gill said:

I am pleased I didnt get the 100th post, it would have been a shallow triumph and as I said earlier I have loftier ideals


Should it have happened I would have given the Mercedes away to the chairman of the Mickleover branch (The Hollow chapter) of Boro supporters so that it could be used for trips to wtach the Boro.


I will however be watching from behind the sofa, oddly enough in The Hollow in Mickleover, in the vain hope my absence will help the cause.

Grove Hill wallah said:

So! It would appear that you are relating back to the events of 546 BC (before comments). Historical fact tells us that Phidippides missed several tests due to the fact he “forgot” and was in Marcus and Spencious shopping.


I thank you for pointing out the sad demise of Mr Bakhramov. This could explain why he has not replied to any of my calls regarding a new appeal.


I was prepared to draw a line under this episode until, in a moment of high drama, a Miss Della Street burst into my office waving a piece of paper. The said piece of paper bore the written statement of a Mr Rob Shoebridge from Selhurst Park; on it he states that he clearly saw the “100 Comment”.


My new appeal is to be handled by Mr George Carman; he has extensive experience in matters regarding the number 3 and its derivatives. He has informed me that there is currently an investigation in process regarding compromising pictures of certain panel members, exchanging brown paper bags in a Little Chef on the A19. His exact words...”.it is well known that ***** likes a bung!”


The full details of the appeal can be read at www.nothingbettertodo.com

Forever Dormo said:

Oy, Jarkko! First of all nicking the 100th post because the sun rises earlier in Finland. Secondly having a go at Redcar....


It is considerably more upmarket than Dormo, and some say that Dormo is really a suburb of the great metropolis that is Redcar. And they might not tell you this in Finland but Redcar has the oldest existing lifeboat in the world (the Glorious "Zetland", powered by fishermen pulling old-fashioned oars, and the saviour of more than 500 lives before being retired from service).


Of course Redcar might change a lot in the near future in the event of Corus closing down most of its works on Teesside. Don't want to be political here, but a mate recently suggested that if the Parliamentary seats on Teesside were marginals, instead of a shoo-in for the Labour Party, maybe a little more attention might be paid to things like this. Cynical or what?


Can we nick a win tomorrow?

Benny Brown said:

Has Mr Strachan heard of the old adage "NEVER CHANGE A WINNING TEAM". What is the point of changing the winning team to accommodate Jinky Johnson, who I admit is going to become a great player one day.


Johnson should have been on the bench to use as a shock change if required, the man who was dropped came on to be man of the match, this says something about the error Strachan made in his oriiginal selection.


Having only seen the the Boro play twice in the flesh, when on holiday recently and never having seen them on TV until tonights match against Cardiff, I am reluctant to critisize the manager, but it does seem strnge making changes to a team that was playing out of their socks in the 5-1 win the previous weekend.

Redcar Red said:

I hope MFC start focussing on the game and the team and the rest of the season rather than community politics. I support Boro becasue they are my local team and I want to be entertained, excited and have hope and dreams for 90 minutes, thats all I want and thats all I expect.


I couldn't give a stuff about solidarity and SOS for our steelworks, it has the whiff of manipulation to divert attention from their own MFC mess and a desperate attempt to buy time and avoid a fans revolt.


Messr's Gibson, Lamb and Strachan need to focus on sorting out the shambolic state of affairs at the Riverside and desist from using others misery as a shield. If they were really politically motivated they would have had SOS embroidered on their shirts months ago and provided free advertising around the ground. They could have filled in one of the corners with a huge triangular banner advert in an effort to reduce the "red seat syndrome" thereby simultaneously solving one issues whilst supporting another (it's till not too late by the way and I'm happy not to say "I told you so" should they take up the suggestion).


I'm sorry if I appear a tad callous and cynical but a Championship team with a damaged PR image is not going to make Mr. Brown or Mr. Cameron suddenly join a crusade to preserve what little is left of Britain's Steel heritage (as our political leaders if they have no pride in British Steel we will remember that when they come knocking on our doors squirming for our votes come the General Election).


Steelworkers are sick of being given spin from people who should show them more respect (including politicians whose own reputations are even more damaged than that of MFC and should know better than to resort to £60M worth of spin).


If an appeal is to be made by MFC on Sunday it should be only for 3 points and an end to the dire football being served up at the Riverside for several seasons now. If MFC really want to help the commerce of the area then win promotion.


A Town with a Premiership side is always in Newspapers, TV's and Websites every single day, a Town with a Championship side is relatively unheard of. The priority of MFC should be to raise the profile of the area and in this respect Messr's Gibson, Lamb and Strachan can have a massive impact, unfortunately so far nothing I see or hear of late convinces me that MFC have the bottle or stomach for the battle ahead.


More worryingly I don't think they have the vision, desire or plan for the way back, they can no longer do it with big names and big salaries and the jewels of the youth system have been and are being flogged meanwhile anyone who cared and expressed concerns were ostracised in the belief that "Big Brother Boro" was right.


End the political "MFC thought control" and get back to being "Boro" then we have a chance of uniting and a chance of bringing back pride and respect for everyone in the Tesside conurbation (including Stockton).

Ian Gill said:

All eyes focussed on the lunchtime kick off.


It is the most important match of the season since Tuesday. Currently eleventh and three points would us up to a play off place.


I think it is fair to say many of us would not be surprised at any result but we all want to see us give it a go and pressurise The Bluebirds.


A comment about SOS and the club, I wonder how much of Bulkhaul's equipment is sourced and made in the UK. Looking around our cars and belongings probably the same percentage as us.

Werdermouth said:

I agree Ian, as harsh as it sounds, the belated SOS campaign is little more than gesture politics. Germany are facing the same problems with their diminishing steel industry - it's well known that western industry can't compete with their low-waged asian counterparts without subsidies. But like you say everyone is more than happy to reap the benefits of low-cost consumer goods - it's just the reality of having a global capitalist economy.


Anyway, it's very unlike Steve Gibson to instill false hope to thousands of people with the promise of a return to a better future. I don't know, why but I'm feeling confident about today's result - so appologies in advance for upsetting the karma police.


S.O.S. - Sixth On Sunday

Forever Dormo said:

GHW is respectfully referred to the Judgement given at 12.49pm yesterday.


Two issues arise, which should hopefully put the matter to bed. I might have mentioned there were "3 Points" but sadly the phrase had too much of a resonance, and the post would become longer:


1. George Carman QC sadly departed this mortal coil shortly after handling his last Brief in 2001. The appellate tribunal is no more willing to hear cases advocated via Ouija Board than it is willing to hear evidence from witnesses via the same technology (whether or not particular expertise is claimed in the Number 3).


2. This tribunal is not cowed by revelations concerning brown paper packages changing hands. It has been a proud boast of the finest legal brains which operate the appeals system that they are free from taint of corruption. Bribes are freely taken from both sides in order to demonstrate openness and impartiality.

Neil (Yarm) said:

15 minutes before KO and I've just got my Boro SMS team sheet:
Jones, McMahon, St Ledger, Wheater, Pogatetz, Yeates, Osbourne, Williams, Johnson, Kitson, Bent


So O'Neill, Arca and Lita are out from the team that started against Blackpool. No signs of a switch to a 4-5-1 with that teamsheet.


I fear the worst.

Jarkko said:

Forever Dormo said:


Oy, Jarkko! First of all nicking the 100th post because the sun rises earlier in Finland. Secondly having a go at Redcar....


Sorry, I didn't mean to hurt anyone from Redcar. Especially with all the sad things at the Corus works.


By the way why it is called Redcar? I mean is it Red car (rail?) originally. Or? And, Forever Dormo, thanks for the info on the life boat. Fascinating!


Up the Boro!

Si said:

To quote ComeOnBoro's Andy Morgan:

"Perhaps Gareth Southgate was a good manager after all?"

I really, really don't want to believe he's right. But this season - at least - the stats, not to mention the manner and actions of Boro's board, are on the Gate's side.

Huth and Tuncay - cowards. Why didn't you have the sense to stay with a team that actually needed you?

Benny Brown said:

If Strachan is happy with the way Boro played against Cardiff City we are in real trouible. Some of then team looked as they would rather be some where else, other than on Teesside.


What happened to all those young players that played against Fulham two seasons ago when we trumpeted that the whole team and subs had been born with a smalll radius of Teesside? These are the boys who play for the Boro with local pride, not the old pros who are at the end of their careers with other clubs.


Mr Strachan has to get things in order quick smart, or we may be playing in another league next season and I am not talking about the Premier League

Denis said:

We have reached rock bottom and I have had enough. Sitting in a cold half empty stadium watching football from the dark ages is too much.


No one now becomes animated by what they see on the pitch but there has become a mute acceptance of the weaknesses, sub standard football that is served up by a bunch of no-hopers and never will be's.


The decline of the club is there to be seen on and off the pitch. I see no positive future unless there is regime change at the very top and that will never happen unless there is divine intervention. Years in this league lie ahead, we have had our day in the sun, back to where we were throughout the postwar years in the second tier with second rate ownership, management and a team to match.


A chastening thought but sadly inevitable based on what I have seen this and last season.

Forever Dormo said:

Jarkko at 3.38pm - Redcar is a fairly new town, though there are some who argue that it was a habitation at the time, or shortly after, the Norman Conquest of England in 1066AD. Some people argue there is evidence of a township from the 1060's and it is said at that time that Copsi the uncle of the Earl of Northumbria gave 50 acres of land at "Reidkarri" to the Church of St Cuthbert.


Kirkleatham seems an older establishment than Redcar itself, and the church there, just a few hundred yards from the nearest houses in Redcar (and actually within the Redcar's boundaries) is St Cuthbert's Church.


Kirkleatham has a charitable institution for aged people set up by Sir William Turner who was Lord Mayor of London twice in the 17th Century and who lent a lot of money to King Charles II, and the church there has a mausloeum for his descendant Cholmley Turner.


There is much argument over Redcar's name, and in the early and later parts of the last millennium Redcar (a fishing village) was very much viewed as separate from nearby Coatham, which considered itself as more "upmarket". If you go to Redcar now, you will see many of the villas of Coatham and the larger houses for the bourgeoisie built in cream brick. Redcar and Coatham merged in the late 1800's so it would be difficult to say where one ended and the other began.


Until the mid 19th Century Redcar wasn't a parish in its own right, but was part of the parish of nearby Marske (which is now a village and much smaller than Redcar, though it has a few decent pubs).


It was in the late 1820's that the parish church of St Peter was etablished in Redcar (where I and the First Mrs Dormo** were married so many years ago) and Redcar grew as a town and a parish of its own. Coatham had its own church, and its impressive spire, but now Redcar is the town, and areas such as Coatham, Kirkleatham and Dormanstown (Dormo to those who love it, and some who don't) are now just part of Redcar.


But back to Redcar's name. Some hold that Redcar means the "Reed Marsh" near the sea (there were extensive marshes in the area, and still, just over the railway line between what was once Warrenby and Dormo, there are marshes which are a bird nature reserve).


Alternatively there are several "Scars" or lines of rocks running out at an angle from the beach at Redcar into the sea (which were the cause of many shipwrecks in previous centuries). So we may fro them have "Red Scar".


One thing we know for certain is that the town owes nothing to Henry Ford. Hope this helps, Jarkko.


** At this point my wife looked over my shoulder and I dare not admit the price I now have to pay for my indiscretion. (Still she has gone away now, so I will leave it in).

scoredraw said:

It wasn't anywhere near as bad as people are making out. Cardiff are a good side. A draw would have been fair and if a team deserved to win it was the Boro.


Admittedly Burke was the best player on the pitch - actually that was one of the best personal performances I have seen at the stadium.


Chris Burke is a beautifully balanced player in body and mind. He knew when he could and should go past a player and when it was best to release the ball. His touch was deft, and concentration was faultless. He also had acceleration which he used perfectly. It was a joy to watch him run with the ball.


What sums him up is he knows how good he his but doesn't let it go to his head.
"REAL FOOTBALLER -LOVELY TO WATCH - ENJOYED HIS PERFORMANCE"


To improve we need to add someone who wants to control the defence with that in mind bring Riggot and Coyne back in, layoff the apocalyptic drama queen stuff and we will win 2-0 at the
St sportingworldsweatshopserveyourself.com Stadium

Leave a comment

Boro Taxis

Keep up to date

Twitter

Follow Untypical Boro on

Untypical Boro's Twitter

Categories

Sponsored Links